Should females be allowed in the military (especially in

They should be in all female units.

>>129824031
>can't carry heavy equipment
>can't carry a wounded

why do they even want to be in combat? there are so many other jobs

>>129824451
gender equality

>>129824031
No, they should be wives and mothers at home.

>>129824031
Women are only good for 2 things in the military, clerical jobs and being communal cum dumpster. Keep them theres because they suck at pretending to be men.

nah

File: 3d016504ac73b7b05d4a6a897c0c8b8c.jpg (35KB, 398x600px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 398x600px

The ancient Celts let women do battle. and a Celtic man used to fight harder if he had to protect his lover. On the other hand the modern women is weak and should be in the kitchen.

>>129824031
No.

File: IMG_0919.jpg (211KB, 933x1024px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 933x1024px

>be me 220lbs, in training
>biger guy gets hit with paintball, hes "dead"
3 bitches can't carry him on a gurney
I join, end up taking one side.
Later its just me & a niger officer

Girls just stress, not help, crack under pressure.
>drama prone, not as sturdy in field/no shower conditions
>sorse: try to make it PC for everyone, or get offended. (Bad on unit moralle)

>>129824031

>Should females be allowed in the military

In supportive roles? Sure that's okay I guess.

In combat roles? No, and no sane nation would allow this.

>>129824451
This

If they can carry meet the same physical standards we place on the men, there's no reason they shouldn't be able to (besides periods of course)

>>129824542
>>can't carry heavy equipment
>>can't carry a wounded
>equality

>>129825000
That film is pseudo-history bullshit.

>>129825204
Periods...temporary
Vagina...Permanent...Infections!

4 days no shower is no big deal for a dude. Or weeks. Army now limits exercised to 4 days so girs can get showers.

Women intentionally invnear-combat roles, are there to frisk Burka wearing sand people

>>129824031

No.

They are not as strong physically or mentally as a man. Men can kill repeatedly, some men at least, women just can't.

In Canada, our prime minister is making this a reality... because it's 2017

http://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/politics/military-single-moms-1.4157353

>>129825752
Please archive those
https://archive.is/uJR7c

File: 2f0.gif (116KB, 600x343px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 600x343px

>>129825787
Based Norbot

>>129824031
Absolutely not
t.Guy who was in the Army with no ragrets

Pathetic, emotional weaklings even compared to our smallest joes.

No and that's because their reasoning for everything else that involves integrating women in men groups is shit

>>129824031
Females shouldn't be allowed to have jobs at all. They should be kept barefoot and pregnant.

>>129824031
No. Even the weakest manlets can become stronger than the tallest hulkwoman given proper diet and exercise. Putting females and trannies into the military was a purely political decision. Also only citizens should serve in the military.

Women should not be allowed anywhere outside of the kitchen except a few select jobs, like nursing.

>>129825787
Why?

If and only if they meet the requirements already laid down for the male candidates

If they do, absolutely no reason not to.

>>129824031
no, they lower the standards which are there for a reason. If we wont lower for men with asthma or other disabilities then why should women be allowed to slide in and act superior? I'd rather serve with an injured man than a fine woman, females are not built for fighting.

File: 1496622528197388902.jpg (146KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 1080x1080px

>>129824031
Fuck no. All it is just cosplay at taxpayers expense.

>>129825000

I don't know what film that is, but the insular Celts, I can't speak for the mainlanders, did promote the inclusion of women in their societies in a way that would've been progressive for the time.

>>129825204
>(besides periods of course)
they can regulate that with pills

File: ice_merchant.jpg (98KB, 766x432px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 766x432px

>>129825125
That's an incredible bread... I need to go buy kosher hot dogs brb.

File: tmp_16477-14957443412641914685215.jpg (270KB, 871x1024px) Image search: [Google]

270KB, 871x1024px

>>129825204
Navy Women Head to the Sick Bay Much More Than the Men
"In the Navy women go on sick call 60 to 70 percent more frequently."
http://content.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,97542,00.html

BOOT CAMP GOES SOFT
http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,138095,00.html

Injuries among female army recruits: a conflict of legislation
"A Royal Society of Medicine study on the British military found that that injuries skyrocketed for women “when they undertake the same arduous training as male recruits.”"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1279143/

Tougher Army training doubles female injuries
"The end result was that women were eight times more likely to be discharged with back pain, tendon injuries, and stress fractures than their male counterparts."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1380195/Tougher-Army-training-doubles-female-injuries.html

The psychobiology of resilience and vulnerability to anxiety disorders: implications for prevention and treatment
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3181630/

A Kinder, Gentler Military: Good Thesis, Faulty Conclusion
http://www.traditioninaction.org/bkreviews/A_010br_KinderMilitary.htm

A Literature Review On Reaction Time
"In terms of reflexes and reaction times, men significantly outperform women."
http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/rob/Courses/InformationInSpeech/CDROM/Literature/LOTwinterschool2006/biae.clemson.edu/bpc/bp/Lab/110/reaction.htm

Motion sickness susceptibility
"Women are far more likely to experience motion sickness and vertigo."
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6857537_Motion_sickness_susceptibility

Sex-Based Differences in Pain Perception and Treatment
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2745644/

>>129824031
All western women should be in combat roles

>>129824031
Females should not be allowed off their husbands' property, until modernity is wiped out. They will almost inevitably become brainwashed shock troops for Judaism/modernity, if given freedom after high school.

>>129824031
The ones who can meet the same standards as the males? Absolutely. But that means no more gender specific PT tests, etc.

The rest? Make em nurses and bring back the WAC

>>129825679
>They are not as strong physically

Yes.

>mentally

Most yes, but some are.

>women just can't.

It depends on the situation. In a lot of them no, they can't. But put her children in danger and you'll really be surprised what the average woman is capable of when it comes to harming others. Even the meekest, weak-willed bitch would probably shoot three guys to protect her offspring because at that point her biological impulses are taking over.

Anyway, when I was outside Kabul for two months I met this Cobra pilot who I have no doubt would be one of those rare women with the right mentality for being an excellent grunt. She used to take on missions that others declined just so she'd have the chance to kill ragheads. Granted, I'm pretty sure she was a bit crazy too but being a bit crazy isn't necessarily a bad thing for a grunt.

File: 12801415_954522584596754_5503939051380097436_n.jpg (33KB, 637x637px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 637x637px

Women can join, but no combat positions ever.

>>129827362
This

>>129825000
And the celts got rekt by the Butthurt Anglo who got rekt by the Normans

>>129824031
No, they're not athletic or strong enough to be effective. Men on the front lines need to focus. Women need to be at home having babies

I will only save breeders. Everyone else is on their own. That's how I LARP . 90% faggots shills.

File: 1462843700881.jpg (121KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 960x720px

>>129824031

Oh, look! It's THIS thread again.. Women aren't fit for active duty.

File: 4615061063_ccb74157a1.jpg (234KB, 500x394px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 500x394px

>>129828569
this is ireland now

>>129827785
negative.

women fuck up military units, period. all types.

File: 1485609155337.jpg (49KB, 420x420px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 420x420px

>>129824031
Only if they're non-white.

>>129824031
>Spec-ops: Yes, but don't drop the expectations, and it is extremely selective.
>fighter pilots: Yes, women don't make that bad of pilots to begin with, plus it is pretty selective.
>Tank operator: yeah kind of, just don't make them the person that loads the shells.


>front line infantry: Hell no, infantry generally takes from the general public and isn't selective.
>protecting bases: No, again it tends to take from the general public and most women aren't cut out for it.
>Bomb squad: No, while somewhat different, I don't see women excelling in something so dangerous like this.

File: 1376356116960.jpg (111KB, 1058x705px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 1058x705px

>>129824031
No. But honestly I don't give a shit anymore.

File: 1438808981761_0.gif (164KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 320x240px

In my country females are guaranteed an officer position while the males have to slog their way up the ranks doing manual labour

>>129826851
Women malinger more this isn't news

File: image.jpg (158KB, 895x594px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 895x594px

>>129824031
Women should have their own divisions where they are part of the National Guard (or whatever you call your border force) to lessen M/F mixing problems and moral.

A female mechanized division would be ideal

>>129824031
>Should females be allowed in the military

Women are capable of serving in support positions, but it's debatable how well and whether or not their almost universal whorishness impacts order and discipline.

>(especially in combat roles?)

Absolutely not. All of the evidence suggests that it's a terrible idea and there are no good arguments for it except for equality's sake. And While equality is great and everything, it's an objective fact that women are not physically equal to men, and combat roles require strength that they just don't have.

File: women in the military lmao.webm (2MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x720px

>>129824031
lol no way

File: women in the military.webm (783KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

783KB, 480x360px

>>129825000
Yes they did, and you know what happened? The Gauls and Britons got conquered by a bunch of Italian manlets.

File: image.jpg (192KB, 896x595px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 896x595px

>>129831965
To add, this female only force would pretty much be deployed to guard the borders and take pot shots at the occasional drug smuggler. Basically a glorified reserve with good propaganda opportunities.

>>129832665

Good Lord, I wouldn't have trusted that she hadn't already pulled the pin far enough. Would've ripped it out of her hand immediately.

>>129824031
>(((ZALKOVSKY)))

>>129825204
>If they can carry meet the same physical standards we place on the me

The problem is they can't. In every attempt to integrate women into combat arms programs like Army Ranger School or Marine Infantry School, they standards were lowered or the women were given special treatment, and even then they only managed to achieve pass rates of around 20%. For reference, 20% is about what's expected from training programs like the Navy SEALs and Army Special Forces, and the dudes we send to that are in amazing physical shape going in.

Getting women into combat roles inevitably involves lowering of standards. The only way to possibly avoid that is to put female applicants through a prep course to condition them for the actual school. Which still counts as special treatment, will cost a bunch of extra money and time that would be better spent elsewhere, and if the past is any indication, still result in a level of passing students that would be considered unsatisfactory for almost any other military training program. And in the very end all of it would be to get a minority of a minority to do job, not because they're the most qualified, but to prove a political point.

>>129833667

Well, it was only a dummy grenade (thankfully). This is the problem with liberals though, they want to pass people like this solely to virtue signal. Females are obviously physically inferior to males, but liberals just can't believe it. So much that they actually have to put peoples live in danger to "prove" egalitarianism.

Would you trust a woman to throw a grenade? I fucking wouldn't.

>>129824031
No. Even an out-of-shape man is going to be far more useful when the shit hits the fan than some relatively fit woman. Both because of physical and mental strength.

>>129831514
This. If the women want to die defending my tendie source, then let them.

Western women are irredeemable, they might as well make themselves useful and die for us.

>>129824192
If they are in the military at all, then this. Still, I would not want to be under heavy fire, taking heavy casualties and have the only available back up unit end up being all female.

>>129825204
the problem is how men behave on the battlefield when there are women around. there are instincts to take into account.

>>129836105
Sounds like a great way to eliminate white knights.

>>129832665
There is a reason they say having a woman at sea or in battle is bad luck. Although, its not so much a matter of bad luck as it is a woman's inbred ineptitude.

File: Triggering strong womyn.webm (873KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

873KB, 500x500px

>>129824031
they can't even beat cripples, besides a vast majority of them end up just whoring around in bases

>>129824031
Combat roles, I would say not.

But there are many other roles they could fulfill, such as artillery units, engineering corps, cooks, and other support personnel.

Our army literally says that diversity is our strength, and is trying to double female percentage in the army thanks to our female minister of defence. We are so fucked.
http://www.defencejobs.gov.au/women/
http://www.defencejobs.gov.au/army/about-the-army/people-and-diversity/
When China comes rolling in we'll just slap them in the face with our tolerance

>>129836706
>WTF NO FAIR HE HAS ONE ARM

File: women in the army.webm (3MB, 696x528px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 696x528px

wouldnt want her as backup, but pretty cute though

>>129824031

No

>>129824031
White women should definitely not be in the military. Instead they should give birth to many White children and raise them well. Those women who follow a career or go to the military have less or in many cases none children at all. After all it is just Darwinism and evolution, the degenerates remove themselves from the gene pool. As a National Socialist I plan to have at least ten children.

File: 6800730018_b82a19eccf_k[1].jpg (1MB, 2048x1463px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1463px

>>129837017
>Navy has 19 construction battalions from Vietnam to the Gulf war
>Invaluable in war and productive in peace, these battalions remain at 19 commissioned till
>Women integrated into battalions in the 90s
>Today there are 6 active battalions

The second your unit accepts women in its ranks is the second you go from being practical unit to a PR stunt.
Look at the Navy's riverines. Once the only offensive ground unit besides SF in the branch, now they're so inept they were captured by Iranians and shamed internationally.
Women ruin units.

>>129824031
Only degenerate females. Good breeding stock should never be put at risk.

>>129824031
No.
>>129825204
Ever heard of the "Love Boat?" They wreck unit cohesion. And why the fuck should we destroy a proven organization to satisfy the 1% of women who can function like low-tier, ersatz men?
>>129837017
Some support I'd be okay with, if it was very far from the front. But artillery and engineering = heavy lifting = women fucking up. That, and the aforementioned damage to unit cohesion.

All this being said, though, if we ever get into an apocalyptic racewar scenario, I'd fight alongside any women trying to preserve the European race.

>>129824031
If she is capable of what other grunts are capable, then yes.

And I don't mind a female solider getting raped by enemies.

>>129824031
No

>>129838939
Poor princes. I'll save you!

>>129824031
Only in war time and only when their are on their period.Otherwise?No.

>>129825204
Even if they met physical standards biologically their bones are weaker and cannot constantly sustain carrying heavy loads like male bones can.

File: ksekardistikes-apokriatikes-metamfieseis-gia-gates-12.jpg (85KB, 605x454px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 605x454px

>>129824031

As a Pirate , i want in my gang only .... lesbian couples :)

>>129836706
what's their fucking problem

I know it's not popular to hear but I am okay with women serving, even in combat roles BUT only in very rare situations. They should have to jump through several hoops and clear several waivers to prove they are in the upper echelon of female physical and mental preparation. Currently the military is being raked over the coals in attempts to diversify, and probably has about 35-40% women. I think the number should be closer to 2-4%. There are definitely women that can handle to expectations, they probably won't ever be SEALs or Delta or anything...but when I was at OCS our class has one girl in particular that was probably in the top quarter of the class in terms of competence. The majority of them were wannabe soldier affirmative action pickups, but there are exceptions and I know the one girl is now a fighter pilot and they don't hesitate to kick you out of flight school regardless of gender or race if you don't meet the standards. And there are moments when it's useful to have a woman on the ground too, I know we use them to communicate with foreign women who will open up to female soldiers (because at their core women will always gaggle with each other and share things they wouldn't with men)

>>129824192
all female units that are not anywhere near the wire

>>129841185
Let women in because a few might be great troops. It'll be worth the scandal, drama and infantile policies that will have to be implemented to keep the unit propped up. And hey, she'll look great on AFN ;v

On the principles of our naively egalitarian and utopian society they absolutely should. Women shouldnt equal rights, preferential treatment, and other bulkshit and then be excused from defending the nation from an existential threat. In practice thoguh, this is highly inefficient and inconvenient, and truthfully thdy should not have civil rights at all.

>>129826830
Tfw its a toast.

>>129839918
>And why the fuck should we destroy a proven organization to satisfy the 1% of women who can function like low-tier, ersatz men?

Way to sum it up in one concise sentence.

>>129824031
As it is, yes, so they can get a taste of true equality

In a non cucked world, they should be banned from the military, and having a job while we are at it

>>129826688
This

>>129829286
This

Yes, in all female units only though

Also, when did we get flags

NO GET THEM OUT RRREEEEEEEEEEE
t. autistic rifleperson

Well My PDF is going to be all female so

>>129824031
fuck no

Even in Israel, female recruits have appalling rates of injury and dramatically-lowered standards
But the feminists just prefer to pretend that's not the case

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iUSFF4NI_Us

See here why they accuse this man of lying about statistics they could easily check for themselves

>>129824031
if you can pass the test you can burn the nest
>go to nurses HQ ho

File: 7DB.png (963KB, 1024x508px) Image search: [Google]

963KB, 1024x508px

>>129824192

This.

I have a feeling it'll harm unit cohesion.

The men will compete with each other for the woman's attention. They'll go out of their way to protect and coddle her.

Ever had a girl in your WoW raid? You know what's up.

Military - yes
Ckmbat - No
Droning Camel piss drinking goat fuckers - If they are a good shot with it.

>>129826504
this is a shit argument because they literally can't and standards must be universally lowered to allow them, and it doesn't count for the myriad other factors that makes a soldier, not to mention it being a huge fucking waste of time and resources for integration

>>129824031
As long as they are able ( and want ) to go through exact same training and carry the exact same equipment as males.

File: ypg.jpg (119KB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 720x540px

>>129848023
>ypg
Fuck off you commie/feminist scum

>>129848154
The woman not being able to perform the same, carry the same weight or keep up the same pace will be enough to harm cohesion

File: feminism.jpg (85KB, 847x511px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 847x511px

>>129848490

>implying implications
didn't you notice my flag?


Never mind, I've noticed yours. Nigger.

>>129824031
no you idiot, why do you need to ask this question?
>>129848289
They're not able to do that, how do you not already realize that?

>>129848717
Like a give a fuck about your flag when you fucking post a group of gipsy muslims who are also feminist an commies

>>129848717
>YPG
Fuck off faggot

>>129824031

Women are basically a liability when it comes to anything involving leaving the house.

So no.

>>129824031
Only as hookers.Only then, in their presence there, there is a sense

>>129848154
fucking nailed it, this was my experience in the military. had 2 american females and one afghan interpreter bitch brought to our patrol base so that we could talk to female hajjis in the area since they don't talk to men. Those bitches needed their own tent for just the three of them (We had two tents for 30 guys). The command made us piss outside the wire instead of in our piss trench that was inside the wire along the barrier. So now we were literally risking death to avoid them seeing our dicks.

Oh and it's not like they had a problem with seeing dicks anyways. They fucked two guys in the few days they were there.

File: Rip.jpg (45KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 250x250px

FUCK NO
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2K_JoIgb8Y

>>129824031
MMM might work.. maybe make all female units to avoid distractions. I'm a fucking feminist I believe women should die in equal numbers.

>Women serve in the US Army
>In the first year a third is written off because of pregnancy.

You Go Girls!

>>129848825

Educate yourself subhuman.

https://youtu.be/CcLPyfgXBAk

>>129848898
Kek, I know it triggers you abdul. Have you received your virgins yet?

>>129831341
>Hell no on infantry, but not special forces
Are you on actual drugs?
>Tanker
Just fucking no, bad idea.
>Pilot
I'll give you that one.

>>129824031
Nope. Stupid idea to be honest.
Majority if then are not strong enough physically. It weakens the army desu.

>>129824031
Some roles why not. Combat roles especially infantry? Hellllll no

File: Based Bat Bro.webm (2MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x360px

>>129824031
Women shouldn't be allowed in the military period. I have seen so many black women pushed to top ranks for absolutely no reason at all other than being a nigger. Women are not meant to be in combat, much less doing other jobs. Men even do a better job at nursing.

>>129824031
No, not only are they weak, stupid and bleed from their vaginas, men will naturally be protective and emotionally invested over them, jeopardizing the mission and giving the enemies the opportunity to demoralize and emotionally torture the troops and country's people if they ever get captured.

>>129848023
>Kurds
>uses Female genital mutilation

Literally fucking barbarians

there should be 1 or 2 in a squad to relieve stress and tension from the men.

>>129850137

>kurds
>rojava


slavs are the barbarians of europe

>>129848813
I dunno, there was a female soldier from poland back in 2015 or 2016 that became famous in poland after killing approx 9-12 muslims after her squad was ambushed.

>>129850390
The arguments will be made?

>>129824031
>Not walking thee plank instead

>>129824031
>Should females be allowed in the military (especially in combat roles?)

No, and no. Anecdotal reasons

>>129824031
Not in combat roles. If captured they will be raped. In mixed units, the men try too much to protect the women instead of fighting properly. Plenty of non-combat roles to be filled that women can do well, possibly better then men.

>>129850607

It's not my job to educate commie nogs, but here:

Resources on the Rojava revolution in West Kurdistan (Syria)
http://anarchism.pageabode.com/andrewnflood/resources-rojava-revolution-kurdistan-syria

Anarchists vs. ISIS: The Revolution in Syria Nobody’s Talking About
http://www.cvltnation.com/anarchists-vs-isis-the-revolution-in-syria-nobodys-talking-about/

KURDISH NEWS WEEKLY
http://peaceinkurdistancampaign.com/2015/02/13/kurdish-news-weekly-briefing-7-13-february-2015/

THE NO STATE SOLUTION: INSTITUTIONALIZING LIBERTARIAN SOCIALISM IN KURDISTAN
http://newpol.org/content/no-state-solution-institutionalizing-libertarian-socialism-kurdistan

From Chiapas to Rojava: seas divide us, autonomy binds us
https://roarmag.org/essays/chiapas-rojava-zapatista-kurds/
https://www.popularresistance.org/from-chiapas-to-rojava-seas-divide-us-autonomy-binds-us/

Anarchy in Rojava: A libertarian revolution in the Middle East
https://vimeo.com/120245429

The Rojava Resistance: rebirth of the anti-capitalist struggle
http://libcom.org/forums/middle-east/rojava-resistance-rebirth-anti-capitalist-struggle-07042015

Rojava - Revolution between a rock and a hard place
http://www.wsm.ie/c/rojava-revolution-between-rock-and-hard-place

Anarchy Lives: Rojava
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/anarchy-lives-rojava/
http://bravetheworld.com/2015/06/02/anarchy-lives-rojava/

Rojava's Revolution Is Roaring - Are We Listening?
http://www.filmsforaction.org/articles/rojavas-revolution-is-roaring-are-we-listening/

Rojava revolution: building autonomy in the Middle East
http://roarmag.org/2014/07/rojava-autonomy-syrian-kurds/

Understanding the Kurdish Resistance
http://www.crimethinc.com/texts/r/kurdish/

Books and other resources on Rojava
https://peaceinkurdistancampaign.com/resources/kobane-the-rojava-revolution-and-the-kurdish-struggle-useful-resources/

The revolution in Rojava: an eyewitness account
https://roarmag.org/essays/revolution-rojava-pluto-book/

>>129850137
>female circumcision
>bad
Get a load of this cuck. It's just a worthless little nub.

No idiot. Throw a couple females in an all male combat unit and shit starts going sideways. It compromises the mission because it's a man's instinct to protect these dumb ass bitches who signed up for this shit, much more instinctual than it is to protect your brothers to the left and right of you. It endangers lives, not to mention creates tension among the males due to the females inevitably fucking at least one of them and the others being jealous, all trying to impress these cum dumpsters.

Fuck no.

>>129824031
women shouldn't be allowed to do much more then breed and stfu

Sure, but we don't change the culture. This is a personnel matter and should be seen as such. No new standards, no new shitters or seperate hooches. Crying about periods to avoid work should be Article 15. Get preggo, Article 15 and kicked out of unit. Off to POG land. Must have rules in place against this in infantry or SOF units. Guys who get em preggers, same thing. Dont fuck your buddies. They cant be immune from Wall to wall counseling. A shitbag is a shitbag. No meet standard, no get to stay.

>>129860903
I think that such an action would force many current infantrymen to seek a higher standard to seperate themselves from women. No one wants em. The units thatll have em will be the underperformers, will be considered substandard and guys will do everything to avoid those places. When put there i would expect men to physically (extended PT, constant rucks, etc) punish the chicks until they leave. Self solving problem if standards exist.