You do realize that animals that you care so much for would gladly

>>129734486
You foolish clothing monkey.

Humans ARE animals.

>>129734714
In that case we should not have rights.
The law already protects only the wealthiest so we are kind of there.

Thats...actually a really good point. I'm all for having laws that protect animals from random abuse, but giving them the same universal rights we humans have is literally absurd.

>t. Canadian that can get a blowey joey from his puppy wuppy

>>129735092
Your thoughts are not cohesive.

Reform your ideas and post again later.

>>129735281
To be consistent we should give rights to all animals or none. It's the only way unless you admit that humans are better than other animals.

>>129735503
Sure, I agree with that. Let's give animals rights.

>>129735690
What's the point if they can't appreciate them?

>>129735503
>>129735690
Many rights entail certain obligations, which animals are not capable of upholding.

Animals should be subject to certain protections, which vary in degree depending on their cognitive complexity and ability to suffer.

This thread is not /pol/ and the OP knows it.

This is what they do, they spam unrelated trash day-in and day-out, cluttering our board with nonsense 24/7.
Ask your mods to start enacting permab&s again, only through surgical removal of tumors can cancer be cured.

See?