Tell me where I'm wrong about slavery
>Africans enslave their own people for labour
>Trade them
>Expand trade to other nations
>Word spreads
>White man goes to Africa
>"Holy shit we can buy people here!"
>buy fuckloads of slaves and bring them back
>build tons of shit
>Citizens/progressives think the trade is fucked up
>Souths like "fuck you you're gonna take our cheap labour/remove our income plus they're from slaveland it's normal to them"
>civil war
>Slavery ends
>Africa still doing slavery
>no one gives a shit
>white people expected to feel guilty about this for some reason
How far off am I?
>>129716077
You're far off. Africans weren't selling their own people. They were selling Israelites, their enemy. They said this themselves.
>>129716238
Does it make a difference?
>>129716523
Nope, still niggers selling niggers. Plus them being Israelite is total bullshit. Its just the African's coping mechanism for why they never got past mud huts developmentally. They glomp onto any other civilizations accomplishments and say they are theirs.
>>129716077
Muslims were responsible for enslaving way more Africans than other Africans were.
Other than that, pretty accurate.
>>129716077
Who the fuck is "white man"?
Once you start talking race, you've already lost any legitimate claim.
The Americas were an untapped resource the entire world was looking to exploit. Once the colonies united and began expanding they needed labor to exploit these resources.
Chattel slavery is wholly inefficient. Its like having to raise your own cows for beef, instead of using a market. Slavery requires you to purchase, care for, train, and enforce obedience.....you waste way too much to get little return.
The early americas were expanded by land barons, not "whites".
Once you have mass immigration, you have a more viable labor to exploit, making slavery obsolete (see Irish/chinese/italians). Wage slavery is much more efficient
This is reinforced by the fact that we sent freed blacks to Liberia and our freed blacks used improved slaving techniques there.
> slavery ends
And ushers end the era of Share Cropping, which is a precursor to the extremely violent Labor Riots of the 20th century.
Don't forget about the toxic effects of Reconstruction that emboldened Confederate resentment of a heavy handed yankee "victory", forcing blacks into over representative roles over the southern states.
>>129719795
White man is anyone white? From all I've read it looks like spain and shit were part of the trade centuries before white countries got involved
>Wage slavery is much more efficient
Yeah it was pretty funny/sad reading up that some of the systems were basically identical to modern wage system
>>129716077
Should be
>Jew goes to Africa
Otherwise good
>>129720861
Who owned Saint Dominigue, the slave port in the Caribbean?
>>129722753
Does that count though? One short lived colony in spain?
>>129720861
Spain was one of the first countries to outlaw slavery, moron. They never had slaves in Spain, either. Conversely, Spain was victimized by muslims, who raided the coasts and kidnapped men women and children into slavery before slavery in the Americas even existed.
>>129724052
Without a slave colony revolt owned by the French, Napoleon would have never sold the Louisiana territory to Jefferson
Point being, the area was a geopolitical hotbed of many nations.....that were using slave labor provided by African tribes. Its all about globalization. Africans would've been stupid not to participate in the economy of slave trade (by supplying these nations with captured slaves and profiting).
The popular Alex Haley meme of niggers getting snatched by da white man doesn't hold up under any scrutiny or common sense
>>129716238
That's a lie though.
>>129716077
Slavery is wrong because it creates a justification for breeding slaves which often results in miscegenation.
>>129716077
Doesn't change the fact that slaavery is wrong. Nigger savages doing it too is no excuse!
> Citizens/progressives think the trade is fucked up
Eh, the yankee states just couldnt compete with the slave economy. Northern territories don't lend themselves for much outside of grain and orchards or farms. None of which require the manpower that southern plantations of high demand commodities of sugar, tobacco, and rice. Couple that with how much easier it is to care for a slave in a tropical climate vs the tundra of NY and Ohio.
Southern states had commodities via slaves. Yankee states had industrialization / factories
>>129716077
>white men go to africa
>buys slaves
sorry but I think you mean jews, go look up the records of owners of slave ships, vast majority were jewish
>>129716077
>Tell me where I'm wrong about slavery
By giving a shit about what niggers and white apologists think or care about in the first place.