Let's get an 8Values thread going. Last one died.
How did I do /pol/? I'm getting tired of shitskins and degenerates.
libertarianism FTW
>>129647737
What the fuck is that progressive score? You degenerate. You'll be one of the first to go.
what is up, my dudes
Ayyy
I hate the lack of nuance in these quizzes. Literally 40 questions on there require a "yes, but" to properly describe the one rational answer to each.
>>129648874
there should be more questions i think
Governments suck, we only need 1 strong leader
>>129646656
>Capitalist fascism
The only thing I got from that image is just how deep socialist talking points are ingrained into our society if they're trying to conflate those two things.
It's like no one ever actually even attempts to look at capitalist supporters points on anything
https://mises.org/library/omnipotent-government-rise-total-state-and-total-war-0
>>129646656
rate me pol
>>129650508
The authors of the test self-evidently do not see the interconnectedness between human liberty, prosperity, and what it calls "markets". The terms they use like "progress" or "equality" have no meaning when evaluated in a context that sees markets for what they are: the sum total of all human experience and interaction at work.
>>129651155
>The authors of the test self-evidently do not see the interconnectedness between human liberty, prosperity, and what it calls "markets
Not just that but society in a sense general has completely forgotten this and has swallowed very large parts of marxist crap.
Just as bad as leftist progressive types are neocons who support cronyist corporate fascism and imperial escapades as if it is "free market capitalism" and "spreading democracy"
>>129651674
Couldn't agree more.
Eh, might as well.
How do you manage to pass this test?
The first question says:
"Oppression by corporations is more of a concern than oppression by governments."
It's like asking "do you prefer 'communism' or globalism". All other questions are of the same nature. WTF?
>>129646656
rate/hate
>>129652619
You are a walking oxymoron. Traditional anarchism
>>129653251
i just want to turn back time, to the good dope days of the family plantation
>>129653395
It's like an opposite of anarchy
>>129653544
how so?
rate?
>>129653701
Traditionalism is setting laws and rules. State or any other authority could force you to follow these rules or laws. Anarchy denies your need to follow them
>>129654633
traditionalism is keeping things the way they are
>>129646656
Why do I see this shit compass test on /pol/ everyday?
>>129654633
Tradition is denying scientific progress.
>>129654696
Yes. That's why any traditionalist authority can force you to comply to traditional way. Anarchy is denying such authorities
>>129654963
but there is no authority in anarchy
I'd guess mine would be
70% capitalist
60% nationlist
75% libertarian
50% between tradition and progress
(Though maybe as far as 75% on being open to prgress as I consider traditions a personal choice that should remain out of government.)
>>129655044
That's the contradiction. Traditionalism implies patriarch or whatever
>>129654874
That's irrelevant
Results are obviously in the right ballpark. Calling it "Libertarian socialism" is wrong though. I'm a libertarian social democrat, not a libertarian socialist. Means of production should be in the hands of the free market, unless natural free market operations lead to market failure. Examples are infrastructure, health care, prisons etc. Generally costly projects that benefit greatly from economies of scale, tend to oligopoly, offer substantially greater marginal social benefit than profits and have skewed demand profiles.
>>129646656
>>129655152
the two arent mutually exclusive,
>>129655379
Then please name a single traditional society that had anarchy
>>129655603
the us for about 15 years
POL BTFO
Mosley Fascist here
stop submitting your psychological profiles associated with your IPs you morons.
>>129655654
Those rebels, adventurers and criminals were progressives by those time standards. New branches of Christianity, new social structure, new economy. It's not even close to traditionalism
>>129656339
why should i give a fuck
>>129656415
how can you be more traditional than the beginning of time?
>>129656339
We're already here, ain't we?
>>129656504
Evil NSA will pick up will be able to know your political leaning with ±30% certainty. Because NSA has no other means to do that, it's important not to post these pictures
>>129656339
>posts on /pol/
>already on a watchlist
>giving a fuck about being more specific with your ideology
>not ironically being watched over by big brother as an ironic political liability
>posting unironically
GET ON MY LEVEL, SCRUB
r8 please
>>129656735
And?
>>129646656
The fuck does this mean?
>>129656339
I'm already on US terror lists for some unknown reason and have to submit to extended interviews and luggage search every time I enter the US (quite often, am an F-1 student).
Game is already up, NSA already knows how often I cry when I masturbate
Did I do good?
>>129656878
It means free helicopter rides.
>>129656735
They can already view our every single keynote. Only the Amish are safe from those kike bastards
where are my brothers
>>129656855
>>129657007
I was sarcastic. NSA has better tools to profile people if needed.
>>129656927
kek
Holy shit, what's with all the libtards here?
>>129657033
>>129657122
>>129657144
hes here!
>>129657168
>not being ancap-lite©
It's like you hate freedom or something.
>>129646656
hmmmm
>>129656963
You implying something there, buddy?
>>129656210
Was there a difference between Mosley's form of fascism and Mussolini's?
>>129646656
Iunno how it gave me populist I kept saying the crowd makes bad decisions, but otherwise seems legit
He's a big guy
>>129656878
you're a literal meme
>>129657650
To my knowledge, Mosley was far more supportive of a United Europe. Nothing else too remarkable as far as I know
rate me, senpai
>>129646656
>Trying this hard to equate progressivism with science by using an atom symbol as the symbol for progress.
Delusional
>>129658190
thanks desu
>>129658557
this, why are tradition and progresses considered mutually exclusive? So I have to be a filthy degenerate to be pro-science now?
>>129646656
Centre representin!
I'm black
I hate ambiguous questions.
>>129660086
Damn, you are one of those, belongs in camps kinda person geez.
How bad is it?
Am I a left-wing cuck?
anyone above 50% in equality or authority should consider suicide
Anyone who does not wish for a strong government And leadership is degenerate.
i always get "neoliberalism" or "neoconservativism" but i agree most with the old school 19th century classical liberals.