debating a leftist, need tables and graphs on genetics, eugenics

Only if you promise to just write the data held within. Using image macros as debate rarely works because you'll get the typical
>I bet you got this from a white supremist site
type retardation.
Type the stat, and provide the source when asked.

>>129563340
Aren't you embarrased? Why do threads like this one keep popping up? "Please, /pol/, tell me what to think" or "what do I say against X argument?" posts are cancer.

File: Political20ideology.jpg (41KB, 547x438px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 547x438px

>>129563340
>eugenics
Here ya go.

>>129563570
Needing tables and graphs is necessary when debating leftists, you absolute cuck. He's not asking what to say, he's merely asking for stats.

>>129563516
Usually the infographics posted here are bullshit

>>129563340
http://reason.com/blog/2012/12/13/american-iqs-in-1900-averaged-67-points
Interesting observation on IQ.

>>129563577
>tfw le "niggers have low iq" fags always fall silent when stuff like this is posted

>>129564335
I don't because I understand it. People with higher IQs have the ability to rationalise bullshit. These people are also pussies and it's the fact that they are pussies that determine their political leanings. Ironically niggers are ultra conservative and they have low IQs so you're not really supporting the idea that niggers don't have low IQs

File: IMG_2154.jpg (21KB, 410x397px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 410x397px

>>129563340
Look up the Minnesota transracial adoption survey, or do some research before you start debating in future

>>129564507
>Ironically niggers are ultra conservative
What the fuck? no. They vote blue to get gibs.