What makes Hitler's version of National Socialism different

>>129273062
Crypto Communism

>>129273062
It's just a different type. It's like asking what makes Maoism different than Marxism.

File: IMG_1254.jpg (130KB, 538x1024px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 538x1024px

National Socialism is focused around the volk, Fascism is focused around the state.

File: 1482375800957.png (23KB, 599x740px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 599x740px

National Socialism/Fascism are the same thing, just different expressions of the same world view

NatSoc could be implemented in democracies. Hitlers facist version of NatSoc could only implemented in a totalitarian state.

File: 1474927709802.png (78KB, 282x300px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 282x300px

>>129273457
>NatSoc could be implemented in democracies.

how?

>>129274359
Normal socialism based on the nation state

>>129274783
See this is what they try to lure you into, that's why I said Crypto Communism.

>>129275417
Hitler's version of NatSoc wasn't even meaningfully socialist though, not in terms of seizing the means of production or anything. It was just mixed state capitalist like most countries. Strasserism basically is pretty close to communism, I'll give you that.

>>129275417
>>129273167
>Why didn't I get any (You)'s?

>>129275659
>Hitler's version of NatSoc wasn't even meaningfully socialist though
Sweden is basically communist, so anything going further down that path is a bad thing.

>>129273062
>Ill take, "What is NatSoc for 500!"

http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/riseofhitler/25points.htm

For the ones that dont read and like to watch vids.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiJ8bGg4vuM&t=2036s

uI/tAVPa is a fag

>>129273062
Branding.

>>129273062
Lack of racial laws for starts. Eg Mussolini refused the nuremburg laws. Fascism generally exalts the state, natsoc sees the state as an expression of the volk.

>>129273062
National Socialism is completely focused on race. Fascism isn't. That is the main difference.