In 1900... The Chinese Empire had 460 million people, today it

no one cares, leaf.

>>128871041
This is serious! Stop shitposting for one second, the earth is getting darker and darker

>>128870978
animals will breed like fucking animals

>>128870978
>what is demography transition

Yep. In 1900 white people were over 30% of the world's population. Today they are barely 10%.

Europeans were on the cusp of becoming the dominant form of human being on the planet globally. Then they fucked it all up with a century of unmitigated disaster.

File: NPI (2).png (237KB, 526x405px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 526x405px

>>128870978


Our medicine and agriculture mixed with their breeding habits = Non-White population explosion. Then factor in the Jews changing all of our immigration laws to allow them to flood in, and here we are.
We're in deep shit.

How did this happen with so many genocides and plagues in the 20th century?

>>128871638
We need to stop pointing the fingers, whoever is to blame only whites can fix it themselves it doesn't make a difference who's fault it was. That's irrelevant now, unless we make a change we're heading to the point of no return. Don't forget, the white population is extremely old, once the boomers die 50% of our population is gone

File: 1474596331565.jpg (68KB, 699x485px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 699x485px

>>128870978

>what is malthusian trap

Just compare egyptian or anatolian or syrian population in 1ad and france or germany population

Actually China's population is starting to go into decline now, following Korea, Taiwan and Japan into oblivion

This notion of China as some massive demographic threat to the future of the white race is becoming obsolete

>>128870978
Blame Hitler

>>128871729
It says in the bible if you walk contrary to God then the beast of the field will make our high ways desolate, he will grow in number, kidnap our children, he has violence in his hands. Up to the 1950's Africa for example was still half of europes population, central and South America was still at a low population, and outside of China and India the population of Asia was very small. In the 1960's what happened? We liberalised, we walked contrary to God, we legalised, divorce, porn, homosexuality, we removed Prayer from school encouraged free love instead of a wholesome family with a father as the head of the household. Divorce rates climbed in America from 8% in 1900 to 25% in the 60's!

>>128870978
WW1 fucked up French demographics.

>>128872147
Still, it's no excuse you could easily be at 80 million now if you had babies instead of murdering them, Islam isn't killing Europe, Europe is killing Europe. How many of you know a woman who had an abortion?

>>128872492
>breed like rats because mud people do it

quality >>> quantity

>>128872872
We don't have either one

File: 1481300859270.png (19KB, 495x433px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 495x433px

>>128870978
China and India (summed) had ~160 million people at the end of 15th century, the same decade Britain started colonising the world and conquering primitives with 1.8 million population. At the zenith of British empire in 19th century it controlled 400+ million people while mainland Britain had 6-10 million.
It's productivity*population that matters, not population itself, each extra citizen is a mouth to feed.
Most of the high-tech industry in the west today is hanging on 1-2 thousand people, remove them and you enter new dark ages.

>>128873907
We need colonisers, you colonies don't understand that

Hungary in 1910: 18million
Hungary in 2014: barely 10 million
damn i sure love trianon

>>128872492
I know a few but every one talks about it like they are sugar pills instead of something that seems quite invasive

>>128872950
So let's just make more of the same shitty to mediocre stock and hope we can catch up? Bioweapons and sterilization are the key to the future. We need to cull the herd in Asia and Africa. A 75% reduction in their populations would set things on the right course.

>>128873907

this isnt right

The UK had over 40 million people by the end of the 1800s
France had the same population, 40 millions, and Germany 52 million people.

>>128874878
I agree, we should reduce the population of most of the world to below at the very minimum 1950's levels.

>>128870978
Contraceptive development coinciding with medical advancement at the same time as a decline in religious procreation.

Whilst outside of Europe religious procreation was and in many cases still strong, at the same time as medical advancement.

In China and India , farmers would need to have 10+ babies in the hope a couple of sons would make it to help out.

Now with modern medicine those 10 kids are all making it.

However , outside of Africa birth rates are falling everywhere now.

Because europeans don't fuck like rabbits

>>128870978
Would the Raj really count as an Indian Empire in 1900? Technically it was the British Empire so I'm confused.

>>128878438
Yes, it's the Indian Empire, it was made up of British colonies and the Indian kingdoms that were under British protectorate.

>>128880469
Back then only populated places where Kolkata, Delhi, Rajasthan, the Maratha regions

Its after that bloody Ambedkar the dalits rose and bred like rats and messed up the population

>>128870978
What about all your white spawns that migrated to US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Brazil, Argentine and many many other countries. Forgot to count them?

>>128881164
You are a moron. You think Punjab, UP etc was not populated? Stop posting stupid shit.

>>128882033
Ah yes the h1b fag cometh

I may have forgot the Rajputana empire, the Tripura monarchy etc..

But population explosion happened after independence and because of that asshole

File: whit.png (8KB, 600x500px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 600x500px

In 1800 Mexican pop. was 5 m, today it is 160+ m (120m in Mexico, 40m in US)
In 1890 Pakistani pop. was 18 m, today it is 200+ m
In 1900 Nigerian pop. was 15 m, today it is 200+ m
In 1890 Ethiopian pop. was 7 m, today it is 90+ m
In 1900 Phillipine's pop. was 7 m, today is 100+ m
In 1900 Vietnam's pop. was 13 m, today is 100+ m
In 1700 German pop. was 17 m, today it is ~80 m
In 1600 Spainish pop. was 6-9 m, today it is ~40 m
In 1600 UK pop. was ~3 m, today it is ~60 m

In 1800 Turkey pop. was 5 m, today it is ~80 m
In 1800 Iran pop. was 3 m, today it is ~90 m
In 1900 Saudi pop. was 1 m, today it is ~40 m

In 1900 Korean pop. was 5 m, today it is ~81 m


In 1850 Estonian pop. was ~200k, today it is ~1 m
In 1850 Greek pop. was ~700k, today it is ~10 m
In 1800 Romania pop. was ~1 m, today it is ~23 m

In 1840 Ghanan pop. was 10k, today it is ~30 m
In 1890 Kenyan pop. was 900k, today it is ~45+ m
In 1890 Congan pop. was 3 m, today it is ~80+ m


In 1800 Poland pop. was ~3 m, today it is ~43 m
In 1700 Italy pop. was ~13 m, today it is ~56 m

In 1700 France pop. was 30 m, today it is ~60 m
France was on a path that could have easily surpassed 1 billion in pop. by now; instead, they shifted to outsourcing babymakers.


In 1900 Russia pop. was 70 m, today it is ~140 m
Russia should have been 1+ billion by now


In 1900 Phillipine's pop. was 7 m, today is 100+ m
In 1900 Vietnam's pop. was 13 m, today is 100+ m

In 1900 South African pop. was 5 m (1 m whites), today it is ~55 m (4 m whites)

>>128882658
>>128882658
These bastards are not counting all the whities that migrated out of Europe to America, Canada, South America, Australia etc. Plus the 70 million that they slaughtered in WWII.
So what population increase happened in India is not that out of the ordinary. Whites grew plenty too. Its just that they spread out or killed each other much more.
And not everyone in the US is a h1b fag. Try to think for yourself. Don't drink the 4chan cool aid too much.

Part of the reason was Europe actually had decent medicine compared to the third world and already their birth rates adjusted from pumping out 8 kids and having 3 survive to only having 2-4 or so who are guaranteed to survive.
The third world in that century was still in the transitional period of pumping out lots of kids and having them survive which accounts for the massive birth rates. Decent amount of Africa is still like that actually.

>>128870978
Whyte bois angry they gettin' replaced

You's time is ovah whyte boi now da black kings gon' rule again

>>128883820
The population growth is still to low! That's the thing and not all 200 million whites in America are from immigration, you made babies too

>>128870978
>the apes wouldnt be stomping around the world without anglo transportation and technology
you can thank anglos giving away science and technology to every known monkey on this planet.
if the anglos kept their tech to themselves, the world would remain peasant serfs and underpopulated

>>128871638
think of it like this. aliens have super-tech that could destroy anything at anytime. humans are in awe of this tech and yearn for it. humans pray and beg for trade with aliens to get possession of alien super-tech.

would aliens be that retarded to level the playing field and diffuse their technology to a lesser being and potenional enemy?

now extrapolate to modern times, IEs now diffused tech throughout the planet. everyone has weapons and medicine and shit. overpopulation and wars...
increased conflicts and competition.
all coming from western tech.

the west leveled the playing field. even india is getting into the space race thanks to western tech diffusion. now the west is experiencing replacement by the former 3rd world.

technological diffusion is the worst enemy of the west

we are repeating the same mistakes of ancient times resulted in the genocide of IE in Asia

The 3rd world population growth is booming out of control because of western tech science us pumping futuristic medicines/technologies to primitive societies.

>>128884217
all the world's problems are from anglos giving away technology

the Chinese were not as gullible

chinese knew the worth of secrets and technological superiority and kept a policy of guarding their superiority.

had they applied a trade secret policy of the chinese, the anglos would be in UFOs with the rest of the planet remaining barbarian savages.

there was no practical reason to provide scientific and technological welfare to the apes of the planet and spawn them to overpopulation

>>128884086
Human population was always the greatest in India and China. Europe was a smaller population. Europeans grew much faster during colonial periods while they were creating famines in India. So Whites were always johnny come latelies who have had their growth spur. The African and Islamic population rise is actually a historic anomaly. They are growing faster due to the deliberate Islamic tactic of taking over through over breeding. Plus there are other factors in Africa. But whites have done pretty well growing there population while also capturing most of the external land resources.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUwmA3Q0_OE

>>128870978
implying population determines the value of your country. kys leaf

>>128885713
There are what a million Anglos in South Africa? Imagine 500 million Anglos in all of Africa, imagine a billion Anglos across the globe.

>>128885578
wrong

China and India (summed) had ~160 m people at the end of 15th century

Roman Empire had a population of ~100 m

10th-13th centuries Europe (not including Russia) had a population of ~100 m

Mongoloid genociders induced population extermination on a scale never seen before particularly in Central Asia and eastern Europe.

File: Population density.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>>128886607
Pulling Numbers out of your ass? Picture related shows the population density of the world in 15th century.
Doesn't look like Europe =100 million and India+China =160 million.
Looks more like Both China & India have way more people than Europe.
Again see the following video.

>>128886607
Here is the above mentioned video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SObnO6jnAD8

>>128870978
Europe has no over population issues without immigrants. Look at every one of the other countries you listed. Not one of them is without starving people. Without immigrants Europe would be a safe and healthy place. Imagine all the money Europeans would have to spend on raising children if they didn't have to pay for Abdul the bearded 12 year old to fuck Swedish grannies.

>>128886607
Here is a better one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUwmA3Q0_OE

>>128875695
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Census_Act_1800
By the end of the 1800s yes, but.

>>128871150
And you will not see the future anyway since you will be dead like all of us

128872112
Not even gonna properly reply to you but for real you're a faggot.

>>128885971
Please fucking no. The last thing we need are more A*glos.

>>128887421
>Again see the following video.
Lul, do you realise historians struggle to even approximate the population at time before census was invented? Wikipedia and first google pages all say it was 60-90 million fluctuation in china and up to 95 million in India in 15th cent. Can you refute?

>>128888198

Fucker
I'm gonna link the post for you guys

>>128872112

>>128870978
Too few numbers, Im gaving 40 white kids and making them have 40 each, if youre a white nationalist you must have white children amd maximum amount, by the all mighty will of nature only theough burths can we achieve the racial victory.

>>128871494
We need to dominate the plamet with the white lifeform.

>>128871494
We need to dominate the plamet with the white lifeform.>>128872872
Kike

France has been in a demographics winter since 1800 or so.

>>128871150
its nature taking it's course, to be honest we are feed them and this helped a great deal enhancing those numbers greatly.
Once the whites are gone they will slowly die off one by one.

>>128889032
So ehen Im a grandpa I will have spawned 1,600

>>128887922
if your ancestors thought like you did you would be living a shitty existence fighting for survival

do you not have any sense of duty?

>>128889793
Then these 1,600 will have 40 children each spawning 64,000, then these 64,000 will have 40 children spawning 2.5 million, then these 2.5 million become 100 million a d these 100 millions become 4.1 billion then these 4.1 billion become 163 billion and eventually we will be the dominant lufe form on this planet.

>>128871800
jew detected. and you shouldnt be worried, your lands were once 0.00000001 percent cabot

>>128890092
Dont reply to kikized and negroidized subhumans.

File: Pop density.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>>128888635
The video that I attached the screen shot from was produced by the American Museum of Natural History.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUwmA3Q0_OE
I think it is way more credible than whatever is on user generated Wikipedia. But I am not even going in to how many millions. All I am saying is that Europe was a much smaller population historically, as can be seen from the video and the picture. So whites bemoaning their demise is moronic.

File: indiapri.jpg.560x0_q80_crop-smart.jpg (38KB, 530x278px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 530x278px

>>128870978
You complain about lack of growth, but you refuse to acknowledge the decrepit state of each of those countries you listed as growing, and the influential state of those with controlled growth.

Massive growth isn't necessarily a positive thing, it usually isn't actually. When you have a huge population boom, but no infrastructure to support it, you end up with pic related. More people DOES NOT equal better.

>>128890092
They do think like that least all my family does and sense of duty to what the nation that detroyed it self the people that dont care anyway id rather enjoy my time

>>128884358
>The 3rd world population growth is booming out of control
I wish jewbro.
Down here outside of Mexico an brazil no other country is over 50m

>>128890746
>Burger Museum of Natural History
into the trash

also besides (>>128886607) euro-whites were populace throughout asia (sogdiana, tocharia, bactria, transaxonia) before mongoloids genocided them.

so just fuck off 3rd worlder

File: IMG_2838.png (246KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 640x1136px

>>128890804

>>128870978
>quantity is better than quality

Go ahead and look at the GDP per capita of all of the countries you listed in the first part of your post

File: IMG_2839.png (91KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 640x1136px

>>128891781
Where is better to live highly populated Tokyo or lowly populated india/bamibia/botswana?

>>128891798
Go ahead and look at the deveopments if iceland compared to 80 million Germany.

More population is always superior to low population, if niggers had low population they would be even worse off.

>>128891601
Whatever. Now you are just weaving fantasies. I gave you real referenced data from an authentic source and you are just giving me BS.
Plus why are you so bothered? You know that white nationalists don't consider you Semites white anyway. They'll probably try to gas a Semite before even the Africans.

>>128892399
More population = more scientists more workers, more production, more culture, more arts, more technology, more services, more power etc..

>>128891333
>brazil
Wut? Brazilian population is in decline.

>>128871895
Indeed, but there's no risk of that happening in Africa...

>>128892736
>ponzi scheme

>unaffordable housing, unaffordable higher education
>no job opportunities (native workers replaced w/ foreign diversity)
>shitty expensive foreign goods
>expensive petrol
>broken communities
>instability, chaos (crime, terror), economic collapse


Name 5 inventions that revolutionised our world today after the 80's
>inb4 apple

>>128895099
None of that happens in tokyo

>>128896018
sudoku happens. nipland is culturally and technologically stagnant

>>128896915
Because population stagnant.