Alright /pol/ give me one good reason for why you oppose a carbon

>>128834573
>It's theft

>>128834573
It's theft

FUCK YOU
YES YOU MOTHERFUCKER

I AM TALKING TO YOU ASSHOLE FUCK YOU

>>128834573
>more gubment will fix everything

>>128834573
>tax
>theft

i'll take synonyms for 600, Alex.

>DAILY DOUBLE!!

The target demographic for the tax will just shift the cost to the consumers, like they've already been doing in years past, and the consumers will be forced to pay because oil and gas are a necessary part of life in our countries.

>>128835098
>>128835197
>>128835287
If I take a shit in your pool do I owe you money?

>>128835283
Sorry I don't have the level of nuance of
>no government will fix everything

I'm made of carbon chains. Ontologically challenged tax is lame.

>>128835282
Hay otras maneras

>>128834573
Your position is flawed because you assume you are right. Why the fuck should we have a carbon tax?

if they exist, the only way to avoid climate risks is to have revolutionary changes in the way humans operate

the surest way to advance humankind to a point where climate disasters are averted is through voluntarist market economics.

the technological changes in a market economy will make our lives unrecognizable to past generations.

centralized planning will result in stagnation or regression to more primitive and environmentally harmful ways of living.

>>128834573
global warming is a meme

carbon currently constitutes .041% of the atmosphere.

They've literally convinced you to pay taxes on AIR.

and you're onboard with that. bend over and open your shitter shareblue, the (You) is waiting.

Because liberals are for it and I hate everything liberals like. Also, our republican leaders need money from donors who pollute, so it would be foolish to tax them.

>>128834573

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDK1aCqqZkQ

ITT people that got baited and didn't sage

And more

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCy_UOjEir0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BiKfWdXXfIs

File: pol gets rejected by sentient sexbot.jpg (40KB, 576x432px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 576x432px

>>128834573
>hey pol what's 2+2 and don't say 4 lol

File: carbon tax economists.png (105KB, 942x703px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 942x703px

>>128835386
Tax concessions will obviously be given though. Also companies producing 'greener' products will always sell their product better.

>>128835463
To reduce carbon emissions

>>128835651
stop ruining everything

>>128835706
So you'll be fine if i replace 0.041% of your bodily fluids with mercury?

>>128835938
>>128836084
what a coincidence that all these old ideologues agree with you

>>128834573
It is theft.

>>128834573
It costs a lot and achieves nothing besides filling the pockets of bureaucrats and its also theft.

>>128834573
it unfairly targets people of modern western white societies

>>128836524
Yep this guys right not everyone wants to breathe death

>>128834573
Because Carbon isn't doing anything but feeding plants. You literally cant prove their is climate change, because there isn't.

>>128836524

I know you couldn't have watched them all especially the first link. They bring sanity to the discussion.

File: model enhanced.png (2MB, 3000x3000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3000x3000px

>>128836921
Hmmm. Realistically what would it take for you to admit climate change is real?

>>128836930
seen it before, co-founder of Green peace mad about how they stopped hunting of whales and started opposing him economically. Just a tip, there's a reason these people trying to discredit climate science are appearing on conservative radio shows rather than actually working in the field publishing and engaging in the academic debate.