>A free-speech institute on Tuesday sent a letter to President

Trump's advisors should just delete his account at this point. It's embarrasing for a "president".

>>128768791
>It's okay when liberals do it.

did the king nigger do it too?

>>128768791
I mean you can still respond and your followers can see it right?

Isn't that still a public forum?

What will they do next? Force all YouTube videos to have comments enabled?

>>128768791
>liberals did it too
Proof?

tfw you can log out of your account and still read the presidents tweets.

>>128769121
>Proof
Don't be disingenuous, liberals hate discussion and ban people from their pages all the time.

>>128768791
sketchy as hell legally and only matters if they are blocked form @potus
@realdonaldtrump is a personal account he can block whomever he wants whenever he wants

t. bored lawyer

File: 113408848308.jpg (144KB, 1048x854px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 1048x854px

Nogger can cry, block, mock...
White men get sued if they do.
It's called white priviledge.
And it means that nogger is kike soldier.

tfw posting on 4chan for 10+ years has made me a violator of pretty much every human rights law and US constitution

>>128768968
>>128769121
You really think people would throw a shit fit about liberals blocking Trump supporters besides other Trump supporters?

>>128769395
No shit. This double standard shit needs to end. This bullshit has gotta stop.

>>128768791
Lol but leftist cucks banning anyone that isn't pro refugee subhumans and firing people for their political beliefs is totally cool.
As a lolberg I support capitalism and free association.

Because Canadians are gay, and dumb.
https://www.usnews.com/news/technology/articles/2017-06-06/trumps-blocking-of-twitter-users-violates-us-constitution-rights-institute

File: bleach-clorox-drinking-.jpg (16KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 400x300px

>>128768791
This is so childish.
>he bluckede muhh!!!!!!!
>Huww fuchinkn drr hii!!!
>*blocks BashAntiFash @Real_Twitter_Faggot*
>Itrys surr unfurr thart he buk muhhh!!!! Thyee fukin bighut

>>128769824
Good for you, you can Google.

>>128768791
>he doesn't want to listen to you
>MUH FIRST AMENDMENT

>>128768791
Did Obama ever block anyone on @POTUS?

I'm pretty sure he has in 8 years and nobody cared

>>128768791
Bigger idea here: Free Speech™ now applies to the private company twitter

>>128768791
>free speech doesnt protect you from cnsequences!!!!111
>gets blocked on twitter
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>128770134
Oh right he's never blocked anyone on the official white house twitter but only on his personal account. Interesting discussion but I'm pretty sure it's just blanks from the liberals once again
>>128769420

>>128770339
kek, very accurate

can't wait to turn the tables on leftists and start doing evertyhing they did to us, to them

>>128768791
They have no case. It was his account before taking office and he has a presidential account.
t lawkike
Buttblasted nigger lovers btfo

>>128768791
>he blocking suppressed speech in a public forum protected by the Constitution.
no it didn't. they are still free to tweet whatever the fuck they want.

>>128768791
>he's never been placed on the whitehouse.gov blacklist before
sending 60 odd pictures of big black cocks will do it, can i sue the american government for infringing on my right to free speech?

CALL THE COAST GUARD MY 15 MINUTES NEED A LIFE RAFT

>>128768791
>public forum
>you must sign up to tweet

really makes me think

>>128768791
its a private company that isnt free speak those fucking retards

File: jew piano.webm (3MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 640x360px

Next time twitter bans me for calling people niggers, I'll be sure to remind them that they're violating my first amendment rights.

>>128768791
>this isn't partisan at all

Please demonstrate how blocking twitter users form the presidents twitter constitutes an infringement on their right to speak

You don't have a "right" to the presidents attention

File: PpV0evc.png (186KB, 635x474px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 635x474px

>>128770707
>>128770814

>>128769420

how much does freedom of speech matter when you're using a website like twitter or facebook? like lets say trump plays WoW or something, is it illegal for him to block people who spam his chat?

>Being deterred by being blocked on Twitter
Just make another account? Why do people make a big deal out of this?

>>128768791
>constitution
>applying to a private owned medium
>literaly nothing in said constitution give people the obligation to listen to your freedom of speech

File: 1496597181788.png (38KB, 487x345px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 487x345px

>>128768791
>The Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University in New York said in its letter that the blocking suppressed speech in a public forum protected by the Constitution.
if that were true, then /pol/ would not exist, and 4chan would be primarily used for anime and trap pr0n.

File: 1495077232047.png (97KB, 320x400px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 320x400px

>>128769060
>What will they do next? Force all YouTube videos to have comments enabled?

No. Just on aaaaalllllllllllllllllll the Obama speeches, et al.

>result status: hilarious

>>128770969
it doesn't because none of those are public forums, once you agree to the terms of use, at any time, and without notice, a user / player may block you regardless of what you may or may not have done.

>>128768791
>The Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University in New York said in its letter that the blocking suppressed speech in a public forum protected by the Constitution.
Doesn't it apply to all blocking on social media?

no problem banning wrongthinkers, though, right?

>>128771086
BECAUSE ALL THEIR LIBERAL FOLLOWERS WONT SEE THEIR COMMENTS ON HIS TWEETS!


REEEEEEEEEE

>>128768791
If you shit on the white house floor, I'm pretty sure you'd get banned from being able to go there. Same thing.

>>128768791
it wont work. it would set a precedent that companies couldnt mute/ban/block people on web sites or in online games ect

its already been established that your right to free speech doesnt actually apply in a corporate setting. all social networking websites are companies

bes is being a hungry nigger. grow up and find something else to do

>>128771086
Because they want to build their brand by piggy-backing off Trump.

>be 18 year old on the beaches of normandy
>watching my brothers die around me
>gain courage to keep moving forward by imagining how glorious America will be in the future
>2017: The president blocked my twitter

>>128769395
>someone asks for proof
>you cant provide it and ramble about how they do it all the time

you are part of any problem, anywhere

>>128770969
if the account is labeled as "President trump" or has some type of official capacity there might be an argument but it would have to show some harm caused by the blocking other than lost retweets of epic zingers

even a president has a right to personal privacy on his own private accounts and he can block you from his soundcloud if he wants to

>>128768791
This is a matter to take up with the head of twitter, not trump.

That's because, contrary to what the message says, it's not a public forum. It's private. And twitter gets to ultimately decide who gets banned and who doesn't.

>>128769748
Hey hey ho ho blocking tweets has got to go

>>128771213

this is both bad and good, cause eventually once were all more or less forced to used futurebook or futuretwitter, its entirely up to the company to decide what peoples rights are, unless were willing to tweak the first ammendment to cover internet free speech.

>>128768965
Allahu Akbar. I too agree, brother.

>>128768791
...they are angry, that someone is not paying attention to them...

are they women?

>>128768965
No, it's amazing, fuck off Muhammad

>>128768791
Lmao. Log out and you can see it.

Twitter is a private company. This has zero legal grounds.

Basically if anyone blocks anyone it's a constitutional violation? This shots retarded.

>>128769420
Lol bullshit dude
There's literally no free speech considerations whatsoever

>>128771530
no one is forcing anyone to use these websites. i hope we don't see the day when that may happen

>>128768965

Trump's Twitter account is one of the best things about his presidency.

>>128771823
>no one is forcing anyone to use these websites

sure but thats like saying no one is forcing you to use telephones. as technology progresses its going to be harder and harder to avoid it without simply disassociating yourself from society.

>>128771698
to block somebody from viewing the official account(which deals with the public affairs of the state) could be argued as an abuse especially if all those blocked were members of a specific racial/religious etc group

>>128771992
thats a choice you yourself must make, no one is forcing you to be 'trendy' or 'cool' by using a website or service.

>>128772203
but that's only for @potus
not @realdonaldtrump

>>128771992
The dissociation has already begun.

t. Never had any social media

>>128768791
How does this violate the constitution lol

>>128771448
There is no argument, it's even farther removed than blocking a number or email address
>it's even almost related to free speech to block somebody (an account you can replicate at no cost, not a person) from being able to send or receive messages to a mere distribution method of the white house that in no way constitutes any sort of government forum
You're going to tell me that any and every politician and government office cannot block people on twitter?

I'm a lawfag and it's hard to believe you are one

>>128768791

HOLD UP.

IF WE AGREE WITH THIS WILL THEY HAVE TO UNBLOCK PEOPLE LIKE MILO FROM TWITTER TO BE CONSISTENT?

THINK ABOUT THIS FUCKERS.

>>128772486
I said it could be argued
I didn't say it you would win

maybe in the 9th

So NO ONE could block ANYONE?? on the grounds of free speech? ffs....

This would mean that Milo has to have his Twitter account reinstated.

>>128772742
Are you dumb or what?? Since he is acting in the figure of POTUS, blocking is censorship.

>>128772203
>which deals in public affairs of the state
Blocking somebody has no tangible harm associated with it on Twitter. Even if he was discriminating on protected class grounds it would still require judges to make a buillshit decision. There is no suppression of anything. And it has nothing to do with protected classes anyway, that's bullshit

>>128769826
I don't even know what that says.

>>128772711
Even the 9th would throw it out

You think leftist politicians would like not being able to block shit? I wouldn't be surprised if this is actually some white knight abusing his (tiny) power in some shitty organization

File: 1309603.jpg (643KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

643KB, 1920x1200px

>>128768791
Twitter isn't ran by the government, it's a private entity. Therefore, they don't have to guarantee your first amendment rights. If twitter was ran by the government, I could see the issue.

>>128770920
Holy shit is that a mechanical calculator?

>>128773457
it's likely to do with citizen rights to access public presidential statements

>>128771111
>quads of truth

But this anonymous Mongolian anime forum really is for trap pr0n and anime shit posts

>>128773156
you're right
I covered that a bit in a previous post
>>128771448
tangible harm would be very hard to prove without some special circumstance that I can't even think of right now


for the most part I think this case is DOA but it makes for interesting academic debate

>>128768965
Fuck off Ahmed

>>128772702
They're talking about the power for a personal twitter account to block another user from viewing or commenting on their tweets. Milo and others were not blocked they were banned from the platform by Twitter itself.

>>128773098
Brazil at it again with pinpoint logic.

File: 1491925129875.jpg (188KB, 1152x2048px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 1152x2048px

>>128772702
Umm. . . no. Sorry sweetie, but that's hate speech, not free speech.

>>128770920
I don't even use a calculator on a regular basis but I kinda want one

I could watch that all day like a lava lamp

>>128773098
Show me where in the Constitution it states that a personal line of communication with the president of the United States is guaranteed.

File: facebookfaggot.png (343KB, 641x892px) Image search: [Google]

343KB, 641x892px

>>128768791

yet i get banned for posting a actual Egyptian painting/fresco

30 day ban, every other month for the past 2 years.

Also got banned once for talking negatively about transgenders remaking the last supper

>>128768791
That's his personal twitter account, not the POTUS account.

>>128773789
you don't need an account to see his tweets so it's a non issue

>>128768968
absolutely. @potus blocked mw for calling him a big-eared bitch.

>>128771914

The electric jew wants to kill Trump's twitter so badly

>>128774409

>$15.84 extra dollars on top of normal wage for carrying plates

Why are waitresses/waiters so ungrateful?

Lol this is fucking retarded.
Are they really gonna go against blocking ppl on Twitter?.

About if we start calling them cunts and they cant block us.

>>128768791
But that's a feature of Twitter, so they should be sending a letter to Twitter to remove the feature if they're so concerned about it

>>128775033
>on top of normal wage

that's not the case. waiters don't get paid very much by the hour since they're expected to make most of their cash in tips. but servers who bitch about their tips are just entitled losers, it was their choice to get a job where the amount of money you make is based solely on the kindness of your customers.

>>128774409
>Have to do the exact same amount of work no matter the cost of the meal
>Expect a million dollar tip if someone orders something that costs more than the chicken fingers that table 12 got

File: IMG_3581.png (409KB, 884x903px) Image search: [Google]

409KB, 884x903px

>>128768791
>did he prevent them from speaking at all?
No
>so he just didn't want to listen to?
Yes
>CASE DISMISSED
* bang *

The only people complaining about this are the people who are losing retweets on their epic spam trump tweets as a verified account. Losing that insightful DELET THIS at the top of every tweet from him

>>128775316
>This fucking meme again
You idiots are the worst.

Federal minimum wage is federal minimum wage, no exceptions. Some states have a minimum "waiter's wage" that gets paid to waiters and waitresses regardless of what they make in tips but if they make less in tips than federal minimum wage than the employer is required by law to pay you the difference.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tipped_wage_in_the_United_States

this is sword that cuts both ways no? So if bessie wessie gets her way she wouldnt be able to block anybody that said someting she didnt like right?

>>128775920

ok sure but that doesn't stop the fact that minimum wage is still garbage. if you willing work minimum wage in a job where you aren't tipped you might as well identify as a special needs person because you are on the same level as fucking walmart greeters.

>>128776106
Spotted the spoiled faggot of a child. There's nothing wrong with working a minimum wage job as a kid/young man going to school.

>>128768791
Oh really? Then twitter has violated my first amendment rights by deleting multiple accounts of mine. Fuck these faggots. Day of the rope when!?

oh man imagine if they win there won't be anyone blocked on twitter anymore

free fucking reign folks

>>128768791
>you must let me abuse and attack you. I have to abuse and attack you or I will go crazy and call my lawyer.
Thats what this is.

>>128769467
Silly.... everyone niggers don't get in the pool. They can't swim.

>>128770698
Fuck your fame and fuck your feelings

t.coastie

>>128771460
Yep. It looks like a total waste of time. It's not like the Washington Post is obliged to publish my shit.

>>128768791

Lol, no it's not.

Do they even teach logic anymore?

>>128768791
>suppressed speech in a public forum

Twitter is a public forum? I thought you had to be a member?
All anyone has to do is logout of their account in order to see his tweets. His tweets are public. Blocked people just can't reply or retweet or whatever.
This is so fucking stupid, it hurts.
Apply it to facebook then, too. No private groups. No friends lists. Sign in to facebook, blurt out whatever and everyone on the planet sees it.
1 billion people all talking at once.
Even if I was on twitter, I would have to follow the President in order to see on my timeline what he tweets.
Will the supreme court see this? Or is this just some dickbag college kids throwing their "elite" college name around?
So stupid.

>>128777491

>Will the supreme court see this?

I honestly hope they get their wish.

It will blow up in their face so fucking hard it will be glorious.

So blocking, banning and removing all comments to any forum is breaking the U.S. First Amendment rights? I hope that Trump loses in this case desu, then I should be able to write about the holocaust undeterred. Thanks The Knight First Amendment Institute!

Thats when the parameters of wat is acceptable speech will be decided. 1984 sty-rul

>I have rights!
>to your twitter account

Pfffft fucking children.

>>128772702
>implying anyone here gives a fuck about that kike
You should talk to reddit about that

>>128773098
No it is not. Those people can speak to anyone and everyone else.

Does Trump hav eto be notified that we are speaking now? About everything?

I agree that this might be a good way of reducing the posibility of abusive cults. Concidering you do not have to take action upon anything said, you will simply know and be aware of other potentials.

>>128777601

I don't know. I don't know how the court would decide on this. People and their internet its just ridiculous.
Trump should stop tweeting.
What he should do is start that text everyone at once thing that he can do. No replies, no bullshit. Just bam, Trump text. Stuck with it. No avoiding it. I can avoid twitter. I wouldn't be able to avoid a direct text from Trump telling me his power level.
That would be awesome. That would trigger the shit out of liberals.

>>128768791
If it was the POTUS account they are correct since that account is not owned by trump but by the government. If it was his personal account they are not.

>>128768791
TWITTER IS A PRIVATE COMPANY YOU DIPSHITS.

>>128769121
brett gelman and vic berger have blocked me on twitter. And I didn't even say any stupid racist shit either. Just asked them normal questions in response to some of their shit tweets and got banned. it's all about controlling the narrative for them because if they don't their ideas get stomped by facts and logic.

>>128768791
twitter isn't a public forum, it's a privately owned company

>>128774409
>Trans Type: Credit Card SALE

File: 1496768444197.gif (2MB, 375x211px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 375x211px

>>128768791

>they're so desperate for any news that's anti-Trump that they'll give clicks to stories that literally make up legal violations and attach Trump's name to them

>>128774767
Not to mention the media reports literally every one of his tweets.
This is akin to suing because the president didn't let you into the daily press briefing to hear the comments directly from spice instead of watching them on TV.

It's not goverment part so it doesn't apply to it in same way.

besides its fucking personal acc not POTUS

File: You left-leaning parasite.jpg (17KB, 220x165px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 220x165px

>>128768791
>The Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University in New York
Who? And would they defend an anon's right to wave a confederate flag, I wonder?

>>128768791
just log off and you can see them again.
so hard.

File: IMG_7900.png (2MB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x960px

they literally have no argument at all under 1st Amendment caselaw.

This is a Hail Mary pass by faggots.

>>128768791
>set the precedent that you don't have a legal right to block someone on Twitter if you are a public figure
Fucking do it.

File: 1496107739130.jpg (42KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 480x480px

>>128770920
>file name