Should schools receiving federal funding be allowed to discriminate

>>128762471
The main problem with vouchers is they will be used by Muslims to send their children to Islamic schools, and you won't be able to stop it.

>>128762471
bump

>>128762471
education is a state thing anyway, you should be asking if the federal government should even be involved at all, and why schools costs so much anyway (tons of schools nowadays are pushing for 1 laptop/ipad for every kid and shit like that)

kids should be homeschooled anyway, to avoid jewish propaganda and revisionism

>>128762471

Schools can have a behavior code just like a dress code and it doesn't violate anyones rights. Children (minors) should not engage in any sexual activity while at school and homosexuality is an activity not a choice,lifestyle, gene or any of that shit.

>>128763518
Better than them colonizing human schools and then enforcing their bizarre social afflictions on real people.

File: data.jpg (64KB, 408x408px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 408x408px

>be me
>live in WA
>fucktards in olympia can't figure out how to make a budget
>have been hearing constantly about their bickering
JUST WRITE A FUCKING BUDGET AND PASS IT YOU FUCKS
STOP SQUABBLING OVER PARTISAN BULLSHIT
IT'S BEEN 4 FUCKING MONTHS OR SOMETHING

>>128762471
>Personally I think vouchers don't work because they amount to funding religious (Catholic) schools with federal money, but I am conflicted as to whether they should be allowed to discriminate against allowing gay kids

then you clreary don't understand the concept behind vouchers and free choice. The idea is that you let public schools compete with private schools. If they fail, you let them fail until they switch up the administration. While that is going on, the parents have the ability to go to private schools with the voucher, which doesn't hurt the children. Letting the public schools continue to be shitty is doing more harm than letting them fail.

>>128770286
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/23/upshot/dismal-results-from-vouchers-surprise-researchers-as-devos-era-begins.html?_r=1

>>128771006
Remember to archive

>https://nytimes com/2017/02/23/upshot/dismal-results-from-vouchers-surprise-researchers-as-devos-era-begins.html?_r=1
https://archive.is/G7uM6

>>128771032
LEAVE ME THE FUCK ALONE YOU FUCKING WEIRDO

>>128771006
archive.is/IQUJE

what you said is valid but read this whole article. There are benefits "Other studies have found that voucher programs boost college enrollment and completion rates, especially among minority and low-income students."

I think that it is going to take time for the system to balance out. No improvement from the free market has ever shown up after 1 year of experimenting with it. The theory still remains because students are flooding from public schools, indicating that they are simply unhappy with the system. Whether or not improvement will show, I think it will take at least 5-10 years to be definite on its results.

>>128773199
>>128771006

and to add onto this. You aren't automatically put on the voucher school choice program. Only middle and low income families can apply for it. Key word is that you apply for it, it isn't truly a free-market school system. A real experiment is having all middle class and low income students vouchers

>>128762471
>
1th amendement bitch.