red pill me on why net neutrality is bad. i see all these leftist

>>128753878
>if the left likes it, it can't be good
Congratulations, you've reached 100% indoctrination! Don't forget to vote against your own interests for the rest of your life!!

>>128754446
Names 3 things the left likes that can be considered good.

File: n3.jpg (298KB, 1113x688px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 1113x688px

>>128753878
Just google it.

Basically, every website has treated equally with net neutrality. is like having only one cable plan with access to every channel.

Without it, you will see pic related.

>>128754747
>pic

How is it that none of this scare picture happened before net neutrality was signed in?

>>128753878
it's an american problem, you have laws against mutiple providers in an area. Nobody else cares because we just move to whoever we want to.
The internet for the past 30 years has not had any net neutrality just capitalism.

>>128754572
this .... i dislike mostly everything about the left.
i just want to know why this could be considered bad. because i'm not seeing a reason.

>>128754572
Roads, not having pollution in their water, and freedom of the internet.

>>128754446
>>128754747

lefties fuck off i already know your reasoning. you faggots shove that shit down my throat every day.
>>128755533
bullshit

>>128753878
It's unneeded regulation.

Think about it this way, the internet hasn't had net neutrality since it's inception and it's been fine.

Telecoms will provide better services if they are allowed to manage their business the way they see fit. For such a huge country, US telecoms are very high quality.

Net Neutrality pins down the growth rate of telecoms, turning them into just another anemic socialist system.

>>128755533
>roads

"Democrats Sour on Trump Infrastructure Proposals"

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/democrats-sour-trump-infrastructure-proposals-n768446

>not having pollution

one of Al Gore's houses:

"the former vice president's 20-room home and pool house devoured nearly 221,000 kilowatt-hours in 2006, more than 20 times the national average of 10,656 kilowatt-hours."

>freedom to internet

But not irl, see Berkeley riots.

>>128755838
Haha WOW what a garbage response! You think people want dirt roads and disgusting water? Unbelievable.

File: IMG_9408.jpg (24KB, 350x200px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 350x200px

I wonder if she is for or against more government in our lives.

>>128753878
It isn't. 4chan was completely for net neutrality before all these newfags came in during the election cycle.
It's not a political thing, but there are so many people focused on hating liberals while riding Trump's dick that it has become one for us.

>>128756155
where are these dirt roads faggot?

>>128756469
Nowhere, because the government fucking maintains our actual roads. You know, with taxes?

What do you think is happening right now? Are you acting retarded to prove a point?

>>128756324
see i was thinking this.

>>128756151
>Democrats Sour on Trump Infrastructure Proposals
Well of course they don't want to let the Republican party be the one to get the credit for rebuilding the country. It was the same way when Obama wanted to pass an infrastructure bill to combat the recession. Both parties want better infrastructure--we need it--but it's politics.

>>128756632
exactly. so how did leftists do that when the were already there.

>>128756324
This.
Net neutrality is a bipartisan good until rich telco tycoons started lobbying it as a freeeeeeedommmm issue and rightycucks hated it coz muh lefties.

>>128756324
>/pol/ was socialist before trump meme
Away with you, faggot

File: 1492097501933.jpg (14KB, 325x255px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 325x255px

>>128756894
The government fucking maintains our actual roads. With tax money. That liberals typically vote FOR instead of AGAINST.

Jesus fuck dude...

>>128756989
Ha. Maybe National Socialist.
There were a lot of libertarians in the past (especially around 2012) but even most of them weren't against Net Neutrality.
Sorry that you're so new, anon, but 4chan has changed A LOT in the last couple years.

>>128757100
but the roads were fine b4 Obama...they certainly weren't dirt.

>>128755140
All data has to be treated the same as of right now. They can't limit the amount or speed based on type, so Comcast and CNN can't go all buddy buddy to slow Fox to a crawl.
It also puts a new strain on new companies. You can't compete with YouTube if YouTube signs an exclusive deal with Charter and 90% of the country can't even reach your website. It's going to severely slow, if not stop, the rapidly evolving internet landscape we have enjoyed forever.
It's fucking over progress for shekels. It's the most Jew of Jewish things. It's as Jewish as lying about gas chambers.

>>128754572
Worker's right and (((finance))) regulation.
Also most of us enjoy socialized healthcare as long as it is not clogged with non-whites.

>>128753878
There is no reason to be against net neutrality unless you have shares of Comcast.

File: 1485668408439.jpg (62KB, 623x713px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 623x713px

>>128757393
BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT WAS MAINTAINING THEM. Do you think that there were no taxes or civil services at all before Obama?

Congrats, you got a rise out of me, I feel dumber for having humored you.

>>128756855
>Using govt. projects to combat recession
Keynesian bullshit always fails in the long term.

>All these indoctrinated cunts

Why can't you fucking redditors understand that when /pol/ supports a candidate, it's because they believe he will serve their interests? You're not supposed to bend over for them just because you voted for them.

Think for yourself you fucking cunts, don't just hate something because leftist people like it. Some leftists also hate the Saudis, they also want to limit the power of the financial elite. That doesn't mean you have to become a Wahhabist and start sucking (((banker))) cock.

It's just like after Trump bombed Assad and all you fucking redditors immediately defended it. Pathetic.

>>128757688
no shit did i say i was anti taxes faggot?


thanks everyone else

>>128757720
>Keynesian fails in long run
>"Keynesian economics (/ˈkeJnziən/ KAYN-zee-ən; or Keynesianism) are the various theories about how in the short run, and especially during recessions, economic output is strongly influenced by aggregate demand (total spending in the economy)." is the first line of the wiki article.
...k?

>>128757975
I was asked what liberals like that are good idea. Liberals like civil services, which are funded by taxes, so liberals like taxes. Republicans do not like taxes. What is confusing here????

Consider when half the companies supporting it actually ever have the public's best interest at heart.

>>128755838
I'm no leftist. But net neutrality is important for free speech.

>>128755140
a lot of effort to set up and requires a lot of different companies to somewhat work together

honestly the logistical nightmare required to get something like this started is probably a good enough buffer to keep it from happening for a while yet

>>128754747
Aside from pic related there, net neutrality's destruction represents an existential threat to what we colloquially refer to as democracy or our free society. IMO anyone who actively participates in its destruction is promoting tyranny and is deserving of proportional backlash. There is no redpilling here. Net neutrality has to stay, forever. Period.

thanks anons i will continue to support it.