Explain yourselves poltards https://twitter.com/wikileaks/s

File: 1482517484640.jpg (191KB, 653x477px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 653x477px

>>128697360

>>128697360

You must be the first person to use the word "poltard" and read a single leaked email from wikileaks. Now read a few more and lurk moar

>>128697360
old news faggot

We already knew this. We already know that IS is a mercenarial company that performs terrorism for a fee and began with middle eastern royal family investment, because most businesses turn a profit with leverage.

Now we simply know for sure.

Explain what?
That Trump went to Saudi Arabia, made a deal and got them to roll over on Qatar and now the two biggest confirmed state sponsors of ISIS/ISIL are fighting each other.

That's a massive fucking win for America.

So the u.s. is going to fight isis armed with weapons they gave them indirectly?

>>128697655
So who is paying for the terror attacks in Europe?

>>128697980
The company is paying its employees, that so difficuckt, leaflet?

File: gtr.jpg (55KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 1280x720px

>>128697980

This photo was taken off of a camera that was found at the scene of a recent major attack in London. It is believed that this man is bankrolling them single handedly.

>>128698597
dudes everywhere. uncanny.

>>128697980
The middle eastern royal families you dolt, this money isn't going through the government so any connection a western government uses is returned with shrugs.

I don't know which ones, for all I know it's a singular Qatari teen a decade ago who thought owning a Sunni private army was hilarious so he spent his entire savings.

>>128698485
This too. They already have investment and at this stage can raid oil fields/refineries and rely on lone wolf attackers radicalized by the internet or by migrants sent by their people funding operations, which basically leverage middle eastern royal family money with the life savings of middle and upper class young African men.

In the end we're being attacked by a feudal system supported, like most feudal systems, with theocracy.

>>128698597
He is truly pepe then. Master troll.

>>128699408
That is a point a lot od people need to understand:
> no, it is the ideiology outlined in that 'book'
> no, its the funding through letter agencies/sauds
are not contradictions, both true at the same time

>>128700424
The issue with the "book" argument is appealing to normal westerners, they think if Christianity can be cherry picked so can Islam. I guess it's my issue too, most radical Salafi Islamists quote the Bhukara hadiths, not the Quran.

This is the real problem, Arab conservatism, which of course the entirety of middle eastern upper class is which treats a mostly cultural document which is potentially partially fictional about their prophet as actual law, which by definition only has meaning if it's executed. It's Arab culture asserting itself through a religion and westerners are never going to like it. Arab religion asserting itself is another question.

For "winning" there's really two strategies, the first is understanding the left who are desperately trying to prevent Muslims claiming to be oppressed minorities in the future when a welfare state is no longer possible and thus appear to appease them for history books. They need to understand this isn't a fight against Islam, it's against cultures that aren't necessarily assimilating correctly in the west. They have no need for paedophilia tolerance or spread by the sword random bouts of passion or FGM. These are elements of conservatism in their own countries and if you fight western conservatives there is no reason not to fight Asian conservatives.

Disseminating this knowledge to the actual middle class left wing voters would solve a fair bit, for instance no one would even think "racist" if the Rotterham incident was properly resolved. It would have been anti-conservative Pakistani, but not racist since not all Pakistanis are conservative.

It's the subtle things that disagreeing with these things they're okay with and getting them okay with it, knowing the other side is okay with it, that's how things will change. That's when you have the majority of the people and then their consent.