What's /pol/'s problem with homosexuality in mainstream

Back then being gay was something to be laughed at. Nowadays when you see something like that on the street you go "oh I didn't realize we had Swedes living here"

Personally don't have a problem with homosexuals. I dont care who you fuck in the privacy of your own home. None of my business. But when you start trying to take my rights away we have a problem.

>>128535669
beastiality = homosexuality?

slippery slope, /pol/ right again

>>128535901
>start trying to take my rights away
What insane scenario have you concocted in which you think this is happening to you?

>>128535669
ends up its the beginning of a slippery slope of degeneracy.

also sage.

>>128535669
That was all played for laughs.

Having rocks literally statutory a boy in a gay rape situation to get at the mother is what people don't like because it's not played for laughs. Nor was the gay rape that was obtained through emotional abuse.

>>128535669
>Laughing at homosexuals = promoting degeneracy full force

Elmer Fudd kissing a rabbit was done as a joke. Today it'd be stunning and brave. That's the difference

>>128535901
I second this.

Conservative or non-SJW homosexuals do exist (I'm not talking about Milo).
Kind of wish they'd speak out against the mainstream crap that SJWs are pushing.

File: (((I wonder who))).gif (4KB, 452x523px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 452x523px

>>128536148

>>128536068
One day we'll see beastiality pride parades and liberals will be screaming about how we're bigots for thinking it's atrocious
And pol will laugh

File: bobby.gif (1MB, 280x210px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 280x210px

>>128535669
>we used to have gay jokes
>now we have "gay themes"

I'm not a fag, but I have a legitimate sexual attraction to Bugs Bunny. Several cartoon characters, actually.

I really just hate seeing irl homos in the media, or when homosexuality is pushed as being the new norm.

>>128535891
>tfw our government just passed a bill making it legal for the state to take away your child if you harbor anti LGBTQILMNOPQRSTUV views

i'm not kidding, we're as bad as swedes or worse at this point

>>128536277
No retard, what specifically are you talking about? What rights have the gays taken from you, a non gay?

File: polgb15.jpg (112KB, 957x1024px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 957x1024px

Join the OFFICIAL /polgb/ Discord:

https://discord dot gg/87tYn

>>128535669

All that was a joke and nobody would see it otherwise

>>128535901

t. faggot who goes to chemsex parties every weekend and has AIDS

>>128535669
>Parents
>Spacejam

How old are you, OP?

>>128535669
I don't care what you want to do with another man in the privacy of your own home, anon, but knock off with the faggotry in public.

>>128535669
It's called drag comedy. They joke is that it's two guys kissing when it should be a man and a woman. In other words, homosexuality is wrong.

>>128536364
No, /pol/ will say it's atrocious and liberals will laugh.

File: pol_boipucci.jpg (60KB, 1625x215px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 1625x215px

>>128535669
Most of /pol/ is deeply closeted. It explains the misogyny, worshipping power daddy figures like Trump, gun fetishes, shirtless/muscle pictures, obession with masculinity and cuckoldry, and of course the homophobia. Do yourselves a favor and just suck a dick already.

>>128536442
I have to make cakes for homosexual married couples if I own a bakery. I can't deny them service.

>>128535669
I have literally never heard of anyone complaining about fags in TV. In real life or through news/media.
What the fuck are they talking about?

>>128536824
I dunno about you, but I'm gonna be laughing my ass off when we've reached that level of social collapse and pol was right again

>>128536971
>you're probably gay just suck a dick already and find out

Truly the thinking of a mentally ill faggot.

>>128535669
acceptance by any means necessary is why the gay lobby is hated.

Your sexuality is deviant...and nothing can change that fact.

>>128536442
Freedom of association, for one
>Bake the fucking cake, bigot

>>128536429
Run south, don't look back.

File: 1496020504698.jpg (236KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

236KB, 1000x1000px

>>128535669
Dangers of Homosexuality:

https://pastebin.com/aiTLKLJc

>>128537131
/pol/ will be right, as always, but this is not a good thing.

File: 1494949823349.jpg (28KB, 720x453px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 720x453px

>>128536148
http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/bills/bills_detail.do?locale=en&BillID=4479

>They're not infringing on your rights! What are you talking about?! By not handing over your supple young children, you are actually violating their rights.

>>128536990
>>128537236
That's by far the gayest complaint I've ever heard. Is that really all you've got? That you can't NOT sell gays cake?

homosexuals need social acceptance because they feel icky about their sexuality.

>>128537303
>implying i haven't taken the black pill already

it's too late for us, wait for the collapse, form a strong community and don't let the state become what it has become here

>>128535669
when bugs kisses his adversary it is meant to mock and humiliate them. as though being a faggot was humiliating, even moreso than losing some physical contest vs another man

>>128535669
>Making fun of the idea of two men marrying/kissing is the same as glorifying homosexuality like its some beautiful thing
For the record, I don't care if you're gay, but that picture is retarded
>>128537489
Yes, I value people having the right to choose who they do business with. I wouldn't mind baking the cake, but forcing an openly Christian business into doing something that they see as immoral is wrong

>>128536148
Right to refuse service

BAKE THE FUCKING CAKE BIGOT

>>128536364
The day that happens, ill go full van of tolerance on them

>>128536971
>Most of /pol/ is deeply closeted.
wrong. I accept my inclination for feminine benis. I'm also all those other things you said. eat shit, faggot

>>128535669
Ugh, transphobic trash! Saged.

>>128535669
Remember when a man kissing another man was the butt of the joke?

>>128537473
You're citing some kind of adoption law and claiming that it gives gays the ability to steal your children? First of all, it's native children, so why do you care? Secondly, where are gays mentioned??

>>128537676
>but forcing an openly Christian business into doing something that they see as immoral is wrong
Oh that's right religion is perfect and special and deserves to win over every other possible worldview in the eyes of the law. My bad, I guess your desire to not want them to have a cake is literally more important than their desire to have a cake.

It's aberrant behavior and a mark of a mentally ill individual. When eugenics are finally accepted, it will be gone.

File: 0040.jpg (49KB, 502x460px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 502x460px

Quit trying to push it down everyone's throat. No pun intended

>>128537183
>can only know if you're truely gay if you've tried it and hated it
i bet you haven't even kissed boys, faggot

>>128537489
The point was that I should be able to deny anyone service no matter their sexual orientation, color, religion, etc.

What a shitty response btw. You didn't even refute. You just said "Psh, like seriously??? that's nothing! Get over it!1" How would you like it if I just took gay marriage rights away. Just get over it.

>>128535669
https://youtu.be/E7L4V-CbdoQ

>>128535891
This

>>128537934
>Oh that's right religion is perfect and special and deserves to win over every other possible worldview in the eyes of the law
No, retard. If you disagree with their worldview, you're free to hire one of the other bakeries out there. No one is asking for the government to promote Christianity, only to allow Christians to follow their moral code in matters like this.

>My bad, I guess your desire to not want them to have a cake is literally more important than their desire to have a cake.
You don't own their labor. You have the right to get a cake, but not to force specific people into making you a cake. What's so hard about this?

File: 1493610133367.jpg (76KB, 251x1024px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 251x1024px

>>128535901

>Oh that's right religion is perfect and special and deserves to win over every other possible worldview in the eyes of the law. My bad, I guess your desire to not want them to have a cake is literally more important than their desire to have a cake.

Having an absolute to judge ourselves and the state is essential. By denying the moral rightness of Christianity you are undermining our freedom and being a useful idiot to the state.

>>128538010
>I should be able to deny anyone service no matter their sexual orientation, color, religion, etc.
Any they should be able to deny your denial. It's like you purposefully misunderstand the meaning of freedom.

>How would you like it if I just took gay marriage rights away. Just get over it.
So your outrage is justified but theirs isn't?

>>128538349
>Any they should be able to deny your denial.
That's not how it works...You are just bait now.
Why do you get to say what I do with my business that I own?

>So your outrage is justified but theirs isn't?
I was showing you how ridiculous your argument was.

>>128538169
>but not to force specific people into making you a cake
And yet you have the right to force specific people to not buy the cake? That's the point, the entire ability to discriminate is lawfully outdated.

>>128535669
Bugs Bunny is the mischievous trickster archetype
Are homosexuals suggesting they too are tricksters?

>>128538349
>Sorry freedom exist to be used only in a certain way, if you try to do something the government consider wrong you are abusing freedom.

>>128538694
>And yet you have the right to force specific people to not buy the cake?
Yes, just like I have the right to tell people they can't enter my house.

>>128538587
>That's not how it works
Apparently, it is. They disagreed that they could be denied, they went to the court, and they won.

File: 1466110678459.jpg (7KB, 306x243px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 306x243px

>>128535669
>Less than 4% of the us population
>Apparently needs equal representation in mainstream culture

File: 1456969065612.jpg (132KB, 1862x816px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 1862x816px

>>128538255
Could you imagine if we threw a straight parade riding in giant vagina floats and shit?

>>128538169
>I don;t serve niggers and spics
that's whats' wrong with it fellow burger. same thing. you can deny people into your home, but you can't deny them into buisness

>>128536429
God leaf, Canada is becoming facist, and not in a good way. Come here, America still has some hope, very little but some at least

>>128538694
Everyone has right for it's own work, you can refuse to work to other and you can't forced other to work for you.

File: HILLBILLY HARE.png (642KB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

642KB, 720x540px

furry traps are not gay

>>128535669
The alt-right is definitely a new thing, and my parents are a lot more lax about faggotry than I am.

>>128535669
Because it's meant to be something hilarious because "lol he got kissed by a dude, that's disgusting", it's not glorifying a decadent lifestyle

>>128539064
traps r gay desu senpai

>>128539005
>you can chose who enter your property, it's not it's yours or something.

>>128538936
>Apparently, it is. They disagreed that they could be denied, they went to the court, and they won.
Yeah, and we are telling you why that's not ok and how they are taking our rights away. The question you asked at the very beginning of your bait.

File: 600 nitro express.jpg (35KB, 366x466px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 366x466px

>>128539154
delet

The 3rd world is not full of faggots and are having many babies. Faggots do not help this and the world IQ drops over time.

>>128538255
>some faggots in a pride parade are taking away my rights!

Jesus christ, you give the SJWs so much white fragility ammo with that shit.

>>128535669
doing it for a gag is one thing

telling me who you like to fuck and expecting me to care is another.

I got called a racist two days ago for responding to a faggot's "i'm gay and proud!" statement with "and I'm not gay but still proud!"

>>128539061
Everyone has the right to work, you can refuse to work for someone but can't force someone to work for you. This is true.

>>128539192
Besides this single grievance, which affects you and the vast majority of us only in theory and not personally, do you have anything else?

Also, how is this any different from ending segregation, or can you still refuse to serve someone based on the color of their skin?

>>128535891
This.

I'm actually surprised "progressives" don't find Looney Tunes offensive because the gay and crossdressing shit is played for laughs. Like you're supposed to think "God damn Bugs is one silly faggot." It's LOONEY Tunes.

>>128536149

Heterosexuals not being able to have monogamous relationships is the worst degeneracy society faces. The LGBT agenda doesn't help, but broken hetero homes and relationships are still the biggest problem by a long shot.

>>128537934
>My bad, I guess your desire to not want them to have a cake is literally more important than their desire to have a cake.

You know what forced labor is called? Slavery.

>>128538936
>Apparently, it is. They disagreed that they could be denied, they went to the court, and they won.
See one non elect public officer think like me, how I can be wrong?

>>128539416
>Everyone has the right to work, you can refuse to work for someone but can't force someone to work for you. This is true.
So explain me, why they should have the right to force that guy to bake a cake?

>>128536068

"Let gay people marry? Psh. We let that happen and then they'll be making us pay for them to turn themselves into women"

I support government removal from marriage but slippery slope is real.

File: qraz0_s-200x150.gif (718KB, 200x150px) Image search: [Google]

718KB, 200x150px

>>128536429
>mfw government is now deciding how its citizens must think

just wait til the EU struggle turns into the global government struggle. It will be much worse.

>If your kid thinks he's the opposite gender, you MUST help it transition
>moratorium on all religion other than science
>women must make more than men at all times
>pedophilia becomes accepted as just another sexuality
>all hate speech (anything that offends) punishable by imprisonment

the human race is so FUCKED at this point. Forget about any freedom at all.

>>128539416
>can you still refuse to serve someone based on the color of their skin?
I stated before that you should have the ability to deny anyone service no matter what.

I can't think of any other rights the US is denying straight people in favor of gays though.

>>128537730
I dunno about Canada, but here in America we banned sex based discrimination in 1964.

This is not a new phenomenon. Most of /pol/ wasn't even born with the right to refuse service based on sex so they lost jack shit.

>>128536244
Checkd and came to post something like this. Libtards are notorious for making shitty arguments.

>>128539593
Because working for someone and serving them have slightly different meanings. Does a business owner "work" for the customer or for himself?

>>128539394
>dumbass R*dditor detected

File: doubt.jpg (78KB, 550x550px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 550x550px

>>128535669
I can go over to /d/, and everyone over there will acknowledge that they are fucked up in the head and something is wrong with their brain. They don't expect societies support, they don't want their fetishes normalized, they don't pretend to be someone trapped in the wrong body, they act like normal human beings.

But you faggots, you think everyone has to conform to your wishes. You want people to high-five you for your degenerate behavior and portray what your doing as normal so you can do it in public.

Well it's not normal anon. Keep your weird fetishes in the closet like the rest of us and act like a normal person for once.

File: BackToLeddit.jpg (137KB, 717x880px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 717x880px

>>128539394
Go away Plebitfag

>>128539770
>Does a business owner "work" for the customer or for himself?
>Hey make me a cake
>No
>You can't say no, you have to do it or you will be in jail

>Hey, pick those cotton
>No
>You can't say no, you have to do it or you'll be in jail

>>128539677
You should have the right to refuse service without basis, otherwise it's forced work.


>>128539770
>Because working for someone and serving them have slightly different meanings.
So you can be forced to do only some works?

>Does a business owner "work" for the customer or for himself?
If he don't eat that cake, he work for others.

>>128539853
>like the rest of us
Fifty Shades has sold 125 million copies

Straights drag their deviant bullshit into the mainstream too.

>>128540157
>look he killed someone too, how can you call me a killer?

>>128540067
>You should have the right to refuse service without basis
You do, if you properly structure your business such that it is not a public accommodation. Sam's Club could turn away as many gays as they want.
>otherwise it's forced work.
You agree to follow civil rights laws when you open your business as a public accommodation. There's nothing forced about holding someone to something they've agreed to.

File: knock knock.png (646KB, 750x2500px) Image search: [Google]

646KB, 750x2500px

>>128540157
First off, that was almost entirely women.

2nd, that WAS us keeping in it in the closet. There wasn't a "50 Shades of Grey" pride parade, a bunch of people bought books which lead to someone making a movie. That was capitalism at work, not attention whoring.

File: wut.png (68KB, 507x202px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 507x202px

>>128536494
Is it a bot? Everytime there's a fag thread this post shows up.

File: FMJ.png (1MB, 707x1000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 707x1000px

>>128540336
So I can make my business a private accommodation and then sell to everyone but gays?

>>128539770
You're playing with semantics.
Someone who creates cakes is in the food service industry. He offers a service for monetary compensation. He is not a slave. He is not an indentured servant. He should be allowed to refuse a potential job at his discretion. He's only losing part of his own income. Forcing someone to do work for you is disgusting. Can you imagine forcing someone to do manual labor like shoveling dirt or mining coal on threat of imprisonment? No? So why is it okay to force someone to do anything else?

>>128540298
If there were 125 million murderers running around with nobody complaining but gays still weren't allowed to murder, we'd be living in a shitty post apocalypse scenario, but it'd still be a socially biased one.

Society does fuck all to suppressed heterosexual expression, fuck off about homosexuals being too expressive.

>>128540336
>if you properly structure your business such that it is not a public accommodation.
His shop wasn't build in public property.

>You agree to follow civil rights laws when you open your business as a public accommodation. There's nothing forced about holding someone to something they've agreed to.
You agree to work on the lord's land and give him 80% of you work when you chose to pledge loyalty him.

>>128535669

those pics aren't gay. They're actually making fun of homosexuality by making a same sex kiss something to laugh at.

Today all 4 of those pics would be considered extremely homophobic in any cartoon

>>128540623
Sado-maso is abuse by current laws, you know what they do? They live they private live and let everyone else do the same.

File: article-1381944-0BD4297200000578-164_634x465.jpg (70KB, 634x465px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 634x465px

>>128540402
>That was capitalism at work, not attention whoring.
I'm confused that you think any of this gay media you're bitching about has no roots in capitalism.

If you're specifically bitching about muh parades, this was one of the most televised events on earth.

>>128540551
So it's all just about the principle of the thing. Never mind that 'forcing him' is not any of those horrible sounding jobs, it's him doing his regular job for people whose lifestyle he doesn't agree with.

I'm sure you wouldn't be pissed at all if a gay company that made something you desired told you to fuck off.

>>128540623
>Society does fuck all to suppressed heterosexual expression, fuck off about homosexuals being too expressive.
Why should 4% of population has the same space in the culture as 96%, does every gay value 24 normal people?

>>128540526
I don't believe the term is private accommodation, but yes.

Walmart-can't discriminate
Sam's Club-can discriminate

They basically provide the exact same service and are even owned by the same organization. It's literally just about how you're structured.

Retards agree to follow anti-discrimination law and then bitch when the government calls them out for not doing so.

What the fuck
Have they watched that shit five seconds later?
They usually spit and look in disgust after being kissed like that.

File: tired.jpg (223KB, 526x877px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 526x877px

>>128540867
It's not the gay media, it's this shit right here >>128540623. It's this idea that homosexuals are somehow "suppressed" or some shit when they already get disproportionate representation in media. If you wanna be gay, fine, but I do not care and don't expect my "support" for your deviancy.

>>128540906
>I'm sure you wouldn't be pissed at all if a gay company that made something you desired told you to fuck off.
I'd be pissed, don't I get pissed when someone you like reject me?
yes
Will I force this people to accept have sex with me?
No

>>128540664
>His shop wasn't build in public property.
public accommodation is a legal term for a type of private business. It has fuck all to do with government ownership, the cake shop was a public accommodation.

It's like greenhouse, it's not actually green.

>You agree to work on the lord's land and give him 80% of you work when you chose to pledge loyalty him.
I'm confused, are you advocating for people to violate pledges of loyalty?

>>128535669

We all knew that was a joke. Now they got them sucking dicks on prime time nbc.

File: cowgirl.png (884KB, 625x1378px) Image search: [Google]

884KB, 625x1378px

>>128541076
Okay, so theoretically I could create a business almost identical to a normal business like Walmart that allows me to discriminate against gays, I might have to sign some paperwork differently but the place will be functionally the same.

>>128541198
How the fuck does making a cake translate into sex?

>>128541021
>Why should 4% of population has the same space in the culture as 96%, does every gay value 24 normal people?
Why should the amount of space in culture be regulated?

You sound like an ass-hat.

>>128535669
in the shows above, it was meant as a signal of dominance ie I am going to kiss the person trying to kill me because I am so smart and have evaded his attempts up until now, to the point where I am close enough to literally kiss him out of spite

it was within a social context of homosexuality being wrong by default

want to go back to those times, hmm?

btw enjoy some anti leftist memery: https://streamable.com/te2b8

>>128541167
>when they already get disproportionate representation in media.
1/33 people is LGBT. That sure as shit is not represented in media.

>>128535669
>Conveniently ignoring these were played for comedy

>>128541342
Yes, dipshit. Discrimination isn't illegal except for public accommodations. Nothing says you have to structure your business a public accommodation.

>>128539394
Bait.dxf

File: dark.jpg (401KB, 1194x824px) Image search: [Google]

401KB, 1194x824px

>>128541528
Why should the amount of space in culture be regulated?

You sound like an ass-hat.

>>128541076
>I'm confused, are you advocating for people to violate pledges of loyalty?
I'm saying that serf have agreed on work the a feudal lord, and as you say "There's nothing forced about holding someone to something they've agreed to.
"

>>128541402
>How the fuck does making a cake translate into sex?
Being pissed don't give you the right to force someone to do what you want.

>>128541402
>Why should the amount of space in culture be regulated?
Then why you are pissed with gay don't receiving enough space? Like you are here >>128541528

>>128540906
Those other jobs are just jobs like any other, you think they're worse because you associate manual labor with slavery. But because he has what you consider an easier job you think it's okay to force him to do it. It's not okay.

>I'm sure you wouldn't be pissed at all if a gay company that made something you desired told you to fuck off.
If I tried to place an order and they said they don't serve me I'd be irritated and go somewhere else. I wouldn't want them arrested for it or threaten to sue unless maybe they were being inordinately assholish.

Anyway I'd like to see a company that doesn't serve straight people survive, that'd be pretty funny.

File: nervous.jpg (104KB, 927x1200px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 927x1200px

>>128541633
So then why don't we hear more businesses doing it? It seems like it'd be pretty easy. Just make your bakery a private accommodation, sell to all the same customers you were selling to before (minus the gays), and you have no problems. It doesn't seem like it would take all that much work, why don't more people do it?

>>128535669
That's not gay it's bestiality. Libshit can't do anything right.

>>128541900
It's harder to open and private accommodation and most people don't know about this.

>>128535669
the joke was it's wrong to do so it's to be laughed at. just like repeatedly smashing someone with an anvil or many of the other violent deadly acts they portray on old cartoons.

/thread

>>128541764
>Then why you are pissed with gay don't receiving enough space?
I'm not pissed that gays don't receive enough space.

I'm pissed that that retard thought they receive too much space.

Economics will sort that shit out in the end. As long as they have the option to pursue space, it's fine.

>Being pissed don't give you the right to force someone to do what you want.
Right, them entering into a legal agreement to give you what you want gives you the right to force someone to do what you want.

>I'm saying that serf have agreed on work the a feudal lord
Ff one had and broke that agreement, I'd call them a traitor.

>>128541799
Why do you so badly need to feel like you're right? Your side lost that battle, get over it. Isn't that what y'all keep saying about the election?

>>128536373
this

>>128535901
amen.....just because they shove it down your throat doesnt mean you have to shove it down mine

>>128535891
fucking kek

File: redskull.gif (2MB, 659x609px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 659x609px

>>128542161
>Economics will sort that shit out in the end. As long as they have the option to pursue space, it's fine.
And that's fine. It's mostly the faggoty pride parades that I have a problem with. But, to be fair, you're not the only ones guilty of that, there's also stuff like "black pride parades" and shit that people do that's annoying.

>>128541900
>So then why don't we hear more businesses doing it?
Did you even realize that Sam's wasn't obligated to follow anti-discrimination laws with regards to their customers before I told you?

You don't hear more about it because discriminating against customers, what with the horrible press, is already a rare phenomenon relegated to the realm of retards. Of course said retards didn't look up how to do it legally because they didn't plan that far ahead. Most businesses don't consider who they're going to keep out when they're opening.

>>128535669
bugs was a fucking animal you dumb fuck. it was meant to be funny and gross jesus fuck
you laugh at the grotesque

>>128535901
They will end up raping your sons. Homosexuals are depraved pedophiles.

>>128542161
>Right, them entering into a legal agreement to give you what you want gives you the right to force someone to do what you want.
It gives the right to force them to bake a cake, apparently.

>>128542247
>Your side lost that battle, get over it. Isn't that what y'all keep saying about the election?
Now it's about us vs them, the good side who support gays and the evil side who support trump.

>>128539178
>you can just snort and deal all the cocain you want on your property, it's not like its a crime or anything
just fuck off,

File: crow.png (2MB, 725x3181px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 725x3181px

>>128542046
>harder to open a private accommodation
Well that's stupid. Why is it harder to open a PRIVATE accommodation over a PUBLIC one? In fact, why do I even need paperwork to open a private accommodation at all? Just the deed for the property should be enough.

>>128540664
>>128541267
hes equating having to follow regulations and treat people like human beings instead of disposable shitbags with serfdom.

>>128542597
>You don't hear more about it because discriminating against customers, what with the horrible press, is already a rare phenomenon relegated to the realm of retards. Of course said retards didn't look up how to do it legally because they didn't plan that far ahead. Most businesses don't consider who they're going to keep out when they're opening.
This here should be the end of the thread, by the way. But you will all keep fighting, I know it. Pointless.

>>128542667
>Now it's about us vs them, the good side who support gays and the evil side who support trump.
Yes, what I was saying was purposefully hypocritical, that's the point.

>>128542247
It's about right and wrong.
I never gave too much of a shit about it. Just said "well that's fucked" and got on with my life. But that's the topic of the thread so we're discussing it, faggot.

File: thief.jpg (308KB, 590x4010px) Image search: [Google]

308KB, 590x4010px

>>128542597
>Did you even realize that Sam's wasn't obligated to follow anti-discrimination laws with regards to their customers before I told you?
No, but I don't own Sam's. If I was opening a business and intended to keep out certain people I would sure as shit look up the laws regarding how to do that.

>>128535669
homosexuality isn't mainstream

>>128542794
>why do I even need paperwork to open a private accommodation at all?
So the government can take into account taxation, zoning, and public safety among other things with regards to your business.

But if you don't think where you eat should have safety inspectors, that's your prerogative.

>>128542597
basically this.

>>128535669
remember when little bitches took it in the ass instead of making memes? Yeah I remember

File: aesthetic.jpg (125KB, 1500x892px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 1500x892px

>>128542976
Okay, fair enough. It certainly shouldn't be harder though. I have no idea why on Earth it would be harder to open a private accommodation over a public one.

>>128542976
god damn thankyou for schooling these nerds better than my empty skull ever could based economic zoning anon.

>>128542858
>This here should be the end of the thread, by the way. But you will all keep fighting, I know it. Pointless.
Why you don't accept I'm right, it's useless to don't think like I do, shut up.

>Yes, what I was saying was purposefully hypocritical, that's the point.
You was hypocritical, you speak about discrimination and defines everyone how don't like certain thing a political supporter of some guy. How isn't this discrimination?

>>128543214
So discrimination is wrong? I'll openly admit it if you do. Here:

I was wrong to broadly judge people like that. It's likely that many people are painted unfairly when I make such judgement.

>>128543162
You are right it shouldn't, but government need taxes and only public accommodations need to pay.

Because it's gay and boring. They make up 2% of the population, but because they concentrate in cities and coil themselves around the cultural production industries, we have to witness them prancing around on screen all the goddamn time. It's sickening.

>>128543354
Discrimination is wrong, you can force someone to work just because you are from a special group.

File: vector.jpg (3MB, 5100x3800px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5100x3800px

>>128543376
It must be MUCH harder then, because if I could form a business where I wouldn't need to pay taxes then I sure as hell would put up with some extra paperwork to do so.

>>128543587
It's not only harder, but very limited on what you can do, you can't have a regular shop as a private accommodation, go will sued you for tax evasion.

>>128543505
But you can tell that special group to get fucked? Why are you still arguing after having read >>128542597

File: stosser.jpg (163KB, 752x1063px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 752x1063px

>>128543831
Oh, that's a shame (also contradicts what >>128541076 said earlier) but maybe things are different in the USA? I don't know, I know that Brazil is a hellhole of overregulation so maybe things are different over there.

>>128543832
>But you can tell that special group to get fucked?
Poor little gays, people are giving them all the special right they asked.

>Why are you still arguing after having read
Because I don't think gays are some kind of noble class who need special right, they are citizens and should be treated like anyone is.

>>128540157
>Fifty Shades has sold 125 million copies

Roasties being roasties.

>>128540402
That pic...?

>>128543992
Sans-club pays different taxes than Walmart pays, you can't use private accommodation to tax evade. If you open a private accommodation and run it like a public accommodation, gov. will close you.

>>128544045
Is this the part where you complain about all the glorious freedoms the gays have enjoyed in the past decade and completely ignore the inhumane treatment they'd been given for the literal rest of history?

I mean, jesus, we gave them the right to marry, why the fuck are they still complaining about how much we hate them?

File: Former_U.S._state_constitutional_amendments_banning_same-sex_unions.svg.png (135KB, 959x593px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 959x593px

>>128535669

>>128544396
>Is this the part where you complain about all the glorious freedoms the gays have enjoyed in the past decade and completely ignore the inhumane treatment they'd been given for the literal rest of history?
This is about freedom or about historical vengeance? I want all citizens to be equal in face of law, that's all.

>I mean, jesus, we gave them the right to marry, why the fuck are they still complaining about how much we hate them?
Because law can force people to like someone, and isn't right to compensate dislike with privilege.

>>128544703
You say they should be treated equally by allowing them to be treated unequally. Am I misinterpreting you?

File: image.jpg (41KB, 968x646px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 968x646px

>>128535669
It's not like we used to hang fags or anything

>>128535891
this

>>128545108
I'm saying that every citizens should have the same right in face of law, the possible exceptions being criminals and publican officer during duty (policemen and soldiers). But you can force people to like some group, that not possible.

>>128545383
But you can't force people to like some group, that not possible.

>>128545471
Is forcing person 1 to like person 2 the same as forcing person 1 to put aside their dislike of person 2?

>>128542655
Woah hey that's a sweeping generalization there friend.

>>128545634
Yes, you can't force people to think the way you think more convenient, isn't government duty do chose what people can think.

>>128535669
All of those are joke gags. Nowadays it's in the context of being "brave" and "proud." Theyre is no need for that in children's programming where the target audience hasn't even had a sexual thought about either sex yet.

t. Homosexual

>>128545810
>Yes, you can't force people to think the way you think more convenient, isn't government duty do chose what people can think.
It's called the law. It's called having social norms. We agree upon it, we follow it. What the fuck do you think a society is??

File: 1494472431928.jpg (35KB, 480x491px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 480x491px

>>128535669
You are filth who promotes more filth and should be disposed of like filth.

>>128545634
>It's called the law. It's called having social norms.
These are different thing, law is what regulated society, social norms is how people interact, USA have and discrimination laws since 1964 (law) and people still disliking gays(social norm)

>We agree upon it
No, gays make lobbies so this becomes law, people are angry because they don't agree.

>We follow it
When you can be arrest for not following isn't surprise people follow if even if they disagree.

>What the fuck do you think a society is??
Many thing, but not my playground to force people think like I want.

>>128535669
/pol/ is full of ruskies, and they legally traded sexual orientation for sexual depravity: two consenting men having sex became illegal and being a pedo became socially acceptable. Go check some vodka tv and you'll see various shows of the "preteen pussy got talent" genre.

>>128546362
That's why Russia is broken and USA is divided, you can't use public power to force morality, by pro or anti gay.

>>128546340
>people still disliking gays(social norm)
But they're not. The norm has changed. The stragglers are now the ones impeding progress. Plus, sexual orientation is not included in those laws until more recently.

>Many thing, but not my playground to force people think like I want.
What you want is a perfect world that doesn't exist.

>>128535669
> What's pols problem with homosexuality
It's against God and nature
/thread

>>128546340
I agree that change must be gradual, but in the meantime many gay lives would be lost. Can't keep teaching our kids that its okay to hurt or alienate people for what they wear or whom they kiss in public.

>>128546669
>But they're not.
Then stop complain about people hating gays like here >>128544396

>The stragglers are now the ones impeding progress.
If they are not hated any more what progress we can have?

>What you want is a perfect world that doesn't exist.
Sure, expect a world were gay lobbies don't use law to push special privileges is ask too much.

>>128547043
>I agree that change must be gradual
Then you got me wrong, I don't think we should use laws to push any change.

>Can't keep teaching our kids that...
You can't chose what we teach kids just because it makes you fell good.

>>128536364
>>128536068
It's spelt "bestiality".

You can think me later.

>>128535669
>homos being the butt of a joke is the same as accepting faggotry
Lol

File: loudhouse.jpg (119KB, 1000x562px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 1000x562px

>>128535669
Bugs was a cwazy wabbit. He did that all for the keks. Pic realted is something different

I'll sleep, by fags.

>>128537676
So it would be ok to deny a black person service because he is black?

It was more about making fun of the ridiculousness of male on male relations. Those generations couldn't see it as anything but a joke.

>>128535669
You leftists made it a problem.

No one cared until you tried to force your diversity into everyone's mouth.

>>128548255
It's ok to work if you don't want, if it's not ok, then you are forcing someone to work, and you what how it's called?

>>128548509
It's ok to don't work if you don't want, if it's not ok, then you are forcing someone to work, and you what how it's called?

File: 1471380079186.jpg (154KB, 350x350px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 350x350px

>>128535669
YOU MUST HAVE POOEY WILLY SEX WITH MEN!

CHECK OUT THIS GRINDR APP WE MADE FOR YOU!

ALL THE ALT RIGHTERS DO IT. LIKE MILO AND PJW!

NO ONE CAN BE STRAIGHT EVER,30 YEARS AGO WE SAID NO ONE COULD BE GAY EVER. TURNS OUT WE WERE NOT JUST WRONG, WE WERE DEAD WRONG.

WHAT YOU ARE GAY BUT YOU ARE NOT INTO SUPER BUG CHASING FISTING PARTIES WHERE PEOPLE HIGH ON METH DRINK MILK SMOOTHIES FOR 3 DAYS AND FUCK EACH OTHER SILLY

I SUPPOSE YOU WONT EVEN NEED OUR ISRAELI MADE HIV MEDI.. SHIT.

>>128548509
Its a simple yes/no question.

>>128535669

Better than being a Whiney liberal bitch who wants everyone's guns taken away and wants radical feminism to control video games and gaming journalism.

>>128548907
>You have to fall for my trap, reeeeeeeee

>>128548686
>tfw unironically enjoy orange is the new black even though it's completely leftist bullshit

>>128535669
>gay themes
giving another dude a smooch for comedic relief was not a gay theme.

i don't know about /pol/ but it's sad to see that gay characters are planted into stories where it doesn't add any value besides the inherent "value" of diversity. i avoid watching explicit gay shit because it bothers me like countless things that you avoid seeing or doing.

there's an audience that wants the gay stuff, and theres an audience that will just have a controversy over the gay stuff. tell me which one most producers aim for. we don't even have to dive into treating homosexuality as a normal behavior or something we should try to find the root cause of and prevent. the controversy never resolves anything and the quality of the media suffers. why aren't there that many good gay movies? brokeback mountain was fine for most people, it wasn't made just to bait anger.

>>128549034
Sooner or later baseless discrimination just can't keep being defended.
>the times they are a-changin

>>128549478
Can't i defend people's right to have an opinion and free-speech?

>>128549478
Depends on what you mean by ok, because it becomes arbitrary. It's ok by legal terms. It's not ok by moral terms, nor would it be ok financially because you lose people coming into your business. Does that answer your question?

>>128535669
The problem is that "gay" stops being a characteristic and becomes a character. It gives way for all the xe/xze type of people who let their sexual traits define them and it becomes another victim race to the top again. I don't personally care who you do in the bedroom but I think glorifying gay just lets stupid degenerate shit to emerge so I'd rather do without it. Also, slapstick =/= gay. Fag

>>128535891
Lol upper branch leaf post

>>128535669
you know there was a time before homosexuality was so rampant that many things were not assumed gay. men getting naked to swim in rivers (with other men). undressing completely in locker rooms.

these weren't, and aren't homosexual activites. but due to the increase of homosexual influence on our culture, straight men had begun avoided these things to not be called "homosexual".

>>128549768
So a person could do it but it would damage both his reputation and his bussiness unless its located in an racist town where most people agree with his discrimination. ¿Is this scenario common in the States today?

>>128539429
>I'm actually surprised "progressives" don't find Looney Tunes offensive because the gay and crossdressing shit is played for laughs
most of them weren't alive to watch it in the 90's even.

>>128550591
Correct. Any further questions?

>>128550775
Nope. USA truly is a fucked up place.
>You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink.

>>128551423
That's what freedom is, my friend. We don't have a specific set of morals that everyone has to follow and abide. Instead, we let the free market do its course and the morals will be guided by an invisible hand. In other words, if you hate that a company is discriminating against blacks, don't buy into that company. Or have a discussion with a racist and show him why he's ignorant. Forcing it down someone's throat will not work.

Lastly, the government should never be able to step into someone else's private ownership unless it is harming someone else's. The government should never be able to tell a business what rules it can and can't have. That's called freedom.

>>128535669

Remember when those scenes were intended to be comical and only used for jokes at the gays' expense?

>>128551805
>unless it is harming someone else's
But if you are a black person in our not-so-hypothetical town doesnt the policies of these not-so-hypothetical biggots would be harming you by negating you service in every fucking store? And lets try to imagine that this black person is too poor to move to another town.

>>128535669
>What's /pol/'s problem with homosexuality in mainstream culture?

1% of the population, 99% of the media.

File: ZD0M7444.gif (993KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

993KB, 250x250px

>>128535891
>oh I didn't realize we had Swedes living here

Rate of disease fags carry as a proportion of their population (also that they are evolutionary dead-ends, the antithesis of a traditionalist society valuing a stable family unit) will turn anybody into a "homophobe".

>>128552265
Yeah, if a town where every single store that sells food is racist and denies blacks service then and can't move because he is too poor (why not make him sick and homeless while we are at it), then yeah the law where a business can set its rules however it wants harms him. It still harms the business too for lack of money.
But if we are going to use that same hypothetical, except the stores do have to service him do you think the people in the town are still going to treat him respect? He still isn't welcomed there regardless.
All in all, it's a double edge sword. You may really despise blacks and deny them service, but that also means you lose costumers not all towards blacks, but people who aren't racist either. The market will adapt to that.

Like I said before though, the government still doesn't have a right to impede on someone else's company. You have to stop being concerned about the feels and more about the private ownership.

no. now tumblr would complain about homosexuality being used for comedy

>>128535891
Fpbp

File: 1488419004548.png (211KB, 2514x1354px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 2514x1354px

>>128535891

>"oh I didn't realize we had Swedes living here"

topzozzle

>>128542247
Society lost, you massive faggot.