>We can't react in fear, that's exactly what the

>>128531406
>Something about these arguments just come across as very WRONG to me. Can anyone explain why?

Its just your islamaphobic brain that searches for excuses. Glad you actually realize you are not being rational when thinking these arguments are wrong. There is hope for you yet

>>128531406
That's because dying in a car crash is a very unfortunate event while dying from getting killed by murder means your fellow human being decided to take your life away from you.

>>128531406
These arguments are wrong and as long as traitors keep making them our people will die horrible deaths. You know the only way for this to stop is for Muslims to be completely removed from western society.

>>128531791
There's no such thing as islamophobia, it's a buzzword made up by the left

>>128531406

When a couple people die in a car crash, it causes a few hundred people to experience traffic delays.

When a couple people die in a terrorist attack, it shuts down the entire city for hours/days, undermines the stability of the businesses and institutions operating in that area, and gives an entire nation PTSD.

>>128531406
>We can't react in fear, that's exactly what the terrorists want
Because people get confused and think anger is a type of fear. The problem is those people are AFRAID of having to actually face the horrors that plot to kill them. They'd prefer ignoring it and hoping it never happens again

>Statistically you are way more likely to die from a car accident or heart attack than a terrorist attack
The misconception is that car accidents and heart attacks are either entirely preventable or simply due to random chance. Nobody is actively planning to get into a car accident nor are they deciding "well next week is a great time to fuck up my heart and hope the ambulance comes in time". Terrorists on the other hand...

>>128531406
The "fact" that the terrorists want you to react in fear is a lie. All they care about is your submission to islam. Doesn't matter how much courage you have or lack.

>Whenever I hear these things, I just rage. SOMETHING about this comes across wrong. Why?

SOMETHING comes across wrong? Perhaps it's this idiotic concept that you must fight hate with love. You can't stop bombs and attacks with flowers and kisses. Islam is the single biggest problem the eu has faced since ww2 and they're afraid to address their enemy AS their enemy. They've invited their enemy into their land. Then, when things go wrong, they insist love will make it stop. How about a terrorist's love of murdering infidels? How do you stop that? With your love of denial? No. You simply must end the problem. Hate doesn't need to be a factor. Logic and common sense are more than enough.

File: 1447293358702.png (94KB, 306x243px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 306x243px

>Libtard damage control arguments boil down to logic as disgustingly oversimplified as "don't feed the trolls", when in reality people are fucking dying in first world countries in extravagantly gruesome fashions as though the middle east is physically swallowing western civilization whole
>and then they go ahead and welcome boat loads of rapefugees into their communities to chase some altruistic high that could've just as easily been sated by giving back to their own community, rather than inviting intolerant hotheads into their safe spaces for extra "tolerance" brownie points because they really are that unironically dissociated from the real world
>and then, the cherry on top: they tack on some statistical false equivalency comparing terrorism to car accidents, like somehow premeditated murder isn't something to be even remotely afraid of despite it's sharp rise in prominence since coconuts kill more people per year than sharks

File: IMG_0697.jpg (145KB, 957x674px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 957x674px

So you want to bring in more Muslims and increase the probability of a terrorist attack?

>>128531406
Because even though the arguments are true, they don't address the counter argument. Yes there are more immediate dangers to the individual than terrorism. That doesn't mean we shouldn't take steps to reduce it and treat it as it is.

File: 1490807212699.jpg (67KB, 910x342px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 910x342px

>>128531406
It's the idea that liberals don't even want us to take precautions against terrorism that bothers you so much.

We put tons of effort into designing cars and roads in an attempt to reduce the number of deaths involving cars. We take precaution against even rare causes of death like lightning strikes. We do these things because everyone everywhere agrees that dying is bad and we should try to prevent it.

Reminds me of pic related and continues to make me think liberals are brain damaged.

>>128531406
Because terrorism isn't supposed to happen here, and trying to normalize it in effort to validate islamic immigration is wrong.

>>128531406
They're right we can't react with fear, but we also can't react with total passivity and with just continuing on doing the same thing. We need to react with strength and start standing up for ourselves for once.

>Statistically you are way more likely to die from a car accident or heart attack than a terrorist attack
What an inane point. Yes, death from terrorism is unlikely, but thanks to open borders and "tolerance" its much more likely than it should be.

They're not wrong, though. You're allowing politicians to influence you through FUD and are no better than those overemotional liberals.

If you look at the issue objectively and logically, it makes no sense to waste a bunch of money and give up a bunch of freedoms fighting what is a relatively insignificant threat to society.

The same people who autisticly quote traffic accidents to dismiss Islamic terrorism think we should ban guns because a lone aspie shoots a few people. It's tactical nihilism.

Also, cars are a necessary part of modern society. Muslims are not.

>We can't react in fear, that's exactly what the terrorists want
they want to conquer us. this argument is retarded

>Statistically you are way more likely to die from a car accident or heart attack than a terrorist attack
that's no reason to increase your chances of dying to an islamic terror attack, which liberals want to do with mass muslim immigration

these are memes that shitlibs repeat uncritically. that's why they come across as wrong to you. they are wrong.

>>128531406

desu the immigration debate at it's core isn't really about terrorism, crime, unemployment, economics, welfare, rape, integration, or any of that. Those are all side issues. At it's core it's about demographics and nobody should be afraid to admit that. You're either on the side that thinks it's a good thing that whites will soon be ever-shrinking minorities in all of their own countries, or you're on the side that thinks it's a bad thing.

just relax and let more muslims immigrate to your country goy

>>128531406
The amount of people killed in car crashes is predictable. The amount of people killed in terrorist attacks is unpredictable. Terrorist attacks are much more variable. It only takes one successful one to kill thousands instead of a dew dozen.

>>128541413
that's a poor argument.

the point is one can have the risk easily mitigated by limiting the amount of people who are prone to committing it.

you can't stop people from driving.

>>128531406
They are actually true; you should not really worry about personal involvement in a terrorist attack, until the muslim % grows in your country.

The point is that Muslims commit way more violence than other groups in a country. Hence the optimal number of Muslims in a country is *zero*.

>>128531406
Regardless of what the terrorists want we should think of our own survival and fear is an excellent survival mechanism when you're being threatened. Not being afraid of a lion running towards you is stupid. How to channel that fear, that's a different question but fear is a valid answer in this case.

Also you're very unlikely to die electrocuted but that's no reason to tempt the devil and poke forks in power outlets. Muslim terrorism related deaths can be prevented and if you don't care about those people's lives just because they aren't many then you're heartless but also those deaths are few now about scale up, it starts with the London bridge and ends with a civil war like Syria, or great unrest and violence like Burma, Bamgaldesh and Pakistan. Just because a problem starts small doesn't mean it will stay small.