>to to a grocery store >everything has one of these symbols

>>128528820
Buy it? Just means a rabbi checked it, made sure its good. You know what else is kosher? Every fruit and vegetable. But you better stay away from those, because ya know, da jooz!

>>128529067
/pol/ is becoming to educated on this shit.

>>128528820
Kosher tags are just jews trying to jew other jews.

>>128529067
And a tax added to it for it to be able to display that symbol.

It literally just means the food meets kosher standards.

>>128529701
Probably doesn't change the price at all seeing as the profits from adding the label out match the costs of adding it.

>>128529701
>And a tax added to it for it to be able to display that symbol.
uhh...no

There's a flat rate for inspection, just like every other certification, but no tax.

File: 1496526612938.jpg (28KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 500x281px

>>128528820
Kosher food is for goys trying to be multicultural. Do you think they really drink Dr. Brown (shit) or Kixx (play on Kike). NO OF COURSE NOT! Real kosher is in the discount food section, the kosher food at wegmans is cursed.

>>128529994
So the company just eats that cost and doesn't pass it on to the consumer? I don't believe that for 1 second.

>>128528820
https://streamable.com/te2b8
in case anyone is wondering why /pol/ suddenly got flooded with new threads asking vague questions, they are sliding this: https://streamable.com/te2b8

File: 1495341122143.jpg (369KB, 991x1465px) Image search: [Google]

369KB, 991x1465px

>>128530257
>vague questions that can stoke discussion don't belong anywhere near /pol/
Bruh, it ain't a slide thread. I haven't even seen the catalog since yesterday.

>>128530201
The consumers paying for it are the Jews that give a shit about kosher.

>>128530201
The fee can't be more than a few hundred dollars for a large plant, also taking into account the increased sales for kosher customers, you're looking at a price increase of...hmm.....1/100th of a penny?

What about the fees for
>organic
>gluten free
>free-range
>vegan
>vegetarian
>Rainforest alliance

>>128530587
have another. https://streamable.com/te2b8

>>128530798
>gluten free
>free-range
>vegan
>vegetarian
It costs exactly $0.00 for a company to be able to print those words on their packaging.

>>128530936
ok can you stop shilling your own upload now?

>>128528820
Eat more pork.

>>128530937
http://www.glutenfreecert.com/certification/certification-costs

wow, really made me think. It's almost as if saying something on the internet automatically makes it true.

>>128530937
Even something like saying your olive oil is "extra-virgin" requires a costly certification from the USDA

>>128531031
nah, enjoy it queer.
>shilling something
>that is free
>with no money invested
kek

have another
https://streamable.com/te2b8

>>128531253
Dude, do you honestly believe that a company needs permission to print the words "gluten free" on their packaging? The link you posted is for certification for using their logo.

>>128532291
I'm actually a Food Science major, the FDA and USDA are super strict about basically everything except supplements. Considering that wheat is one of the big 8 allergens, and gluten intolerance is becoming more prevalent, it's pretty obvious that the label has to be regulated.
>https://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/Allergens/ucm362880.htm
> Any food product bearing a gluten-free claim labeled on or after August 5, 2014 must meet the requirements of the agency’s gluten-free labeling rule. With this uniform definition, consumers with celiac disease can choose foods with greater confidence. Here, FDA experts answer key questions about the final rule for consumers, industry and other stakeholders.

>>128532600
>no proof that putting the words "gluten free" requires certification


And gluten intolerance isn't "more prevelant" now. It's just that people are jumping on the gluten free fad and claiming that they are intolerant.