Why are police allowed to use guns with bullets, as opposed to

sandbag guns, or guns that shoot sandbags. sorry should clarify.

>>128397451
99% of people shot by cops fully deserved to be shot by cops

File: 1436863342803.gif (334KB, 226x199px) Image search: [Google]

334KB, 226x199px

>>128397451
Why are police allowed to use guns with sandbags, as opposed to rockets? Ever been shot by a rocket? Shitll knock you on your ass, AND =
>Police shooting fatality rate -->100%
>Death by cop--> 100%

It's ought to be part of their sacrifice as public servants.

>>128397780
idk man.

sometimes... idk.

File: Annoyed Pepe.jpg (11KB, 251x242px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 251x242px

>>128397451

Why is OP allowed to be such a cock sucking faggot?

If criminals stop being criminals their chances of being shot by a police officer go down significantly.

So instead of investing in sandbags, just stop doing bad things.

Also I've been getting bridge captchas all day today

>>128397451
because they like all the perks of their jobs but don't like danger or dealing with people unbalanced by drugs, alcohol or mental disease... BLUE LIVES MATTER

>>128398550
God, it's people like you that remind me pol still has a retard problem.

>>128398946
>lol ur dumb

Not an argument

>>128398946
wow you sure showed him!!!1111

File: 1478881268012.jpg (50KB, 545x588px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 545x588px

>>128397451
There is no such thing as "non-lethal" ammunition. Only "less-lethal" ammunition.

Besides which, once an officer decides that his sidearm is necessary to deal with a given situation, there is no longer a priority of preserving the life of the perpetrator.

Maybe you need to stop being such a pussy, californianon.

>>128399162
>>128399031
but you guys sure did

>>128399031
The guys initial argue,net was just hurr durr stop doing bad things. You dummies are forgetting that cops aren't the best and brightest, and are prone to kill innocent people. Police are acting as judge, jury, and executioner when they carry the guns they do. How about you give me a real arguement next time buddy.

>>128397451
Because most ''refugees'' have built up a tolerance to sand.

>>128397451

They should use potato guns imho

File: Picture 59.png (620KB, 1048x340px) Image search: [Google]

620KB, 1048x340px

>>128398946
But the violent crime problem literally is a retard problem. 85 = retarded, from the perspective of a white person.

File: good dogo Depends on ethicals.jpg (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

>>128397451
Police killing unwanted folks is a feature not a bug.

>>128399252
Actually I'm a libertarian from the great nation of Texas, you fucking 14 yr old.

>>128399273
>Police are acting as judge, jury, and executioner
God, if only.

>>128397451
>Why are police allowed to use guns with bullets, as opposed to sandbags?
Criminals won't be using sandbags

>nigger

>>128398550
The AI that is data mining these captchas is getting more advanced

File: 1477963894836.gif (2MB, 512x321px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 512x321px

>>128399480
I'm sorry, you just sounded like a pussy. Forgive me for assuming that you were representative of your home state and not an abominable mockery of it.

>>128399512
Oh. My. Fucking. God.

>>>>public sacrifice
>>>>sandbags can/will btfo of anybody just fine, prolly without killings em too. Which is a GOOD thing.

>>128399716
>Which is a GOOD thing.
Prove it.

>>128399569
We know

Destiny the Thread.

>>128397451
Everyone's guns should be taken away and be replaced with bows and arrows

So this thread is just another case of OP pretending to be retarded, right?

>>128399639

That's rich coming from a (((leaf)))

>>128399843
Okay but I'll shoot you if you try to take my guns. Checkmate atheists.

File: happy.jpg (41KB, 480x640px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 480x640px

>>128399716
Public servants are more valuable than criminals.

Criminals have negative societal worth.

Sandbags are less effective than lethal force, whatever you may want to tell yourself.

Think about it a little bit.

Then I think you'll start to understand why we do the things we do.

>>128399908

Wrong. Back to plebbit with you.

>>128399843
I'd rather us have our guns taken away and being replaced with armor and melee weapons.

>>128397451

Sand bags have comparatively less stopping power

Also bodybags are cheaper than trials

>>128399716
>Another mouth to feed in prison
>Good

>>128397900
Dude Bolters are expensive works of art. The Adeptus Mechanus can't keep up accurate production for the Adeptus Arbites. And even if they could, officers do not have the strength to use the weapon my dude.

>>128399480
Texas isn't a nation. And if you're going to shoot somebody, shoot to kill. A Texan should know that.

File: 1479667561857.png (169KB, 946x514px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 946x514px

>>128399912
Even a hostile foreign agent is preferable to a traitor.

Also, if you want every officer to carry around a weapon that can fire beanbag rounds, you are essentially advocating for every officer to wander the streets carrying a 12-gauge shotgun as pistol-sized weapons are generally not capable of firing such rounds. Not if they are to be of any reasonable size and thus actual stopping power, anyway.

I'm totally cool with police carrying shotguns around, but maybe you ought to ask yourself if that's really what you want.

>>128399966
Listen dum-dum I'll break it down real easy for you. Police using real guns is just flat out unconstitutional. The police are only supposed to enforce the laws. There's not a single law that says it's cool to kill a guy. That is left to the judicial branch, a branch of which the police are not apart of. Therefore, by replacing guns with bullets, to guns with sandbag ammunition, the likelihood of a police caused fatality plummets immensely. This is good because there have been cases, not a whole lot but still more than one, where an innocent man has been put down, like a dog, by a police officer. This is unacceptable.

>>128397451

If you arent trolling please kill yourself

>>128400199
Damn. This may be the first actually good counter arguement actually. I need someone to verify this.

>>128400216

You're alive. Now what do we gotta do to change that?

>>128397451
the same reason police dont fire warning shots or shoot at the legs. guns destroy the central nervous system when fired at centre mass, causing the attacker to fold in half in their tracks. this is why people drop immediately when theyre shot, because you sever control of their legs when you hit them in the spine. hell, even if you dont hit them in the spine the temporary cavity inside the torso will disrupt signals through the spinal cord in most cases. riot control ammunition is only good at range because once the distance is closed you cant stop the attacker's momentum with stupid ass beanbag rounds. if youre running at a cop with a knife, no matter how much it would normally drop you, an ouchie from non-lethal ammunition isnt able to negate momentum. the only thing that can do that is a good old fashioned bullet.

Wow, OP is proving himself to be smarter than everyone else in the United States.

This is truly revolutionary... woah...

File: Policia Colombia.png (2MB, 887x841px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 887x841px

>>128400551
Lol, laws are just words on paper.

We live an act our culture, which can be guided by the law (when convenient).

Its like you actually believe 'rules' are real.

We are a far way from the constitution, and the founding fathers didn't have a problem with killing criminals.

I get the feeling you or someone you love is a criminal and just don't want to be killed.

>>128399792
Done. Please scroll done just a lil and read my post adrressed to the retards.

File: 1489897819596.jpg (44KB, 540x500px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 540x500px

>>128400199
Aren't bolters supposed to be a sort of rapid-fire gyrojet/RPG? I know it's way cooler for them to have tons of recoil, but should they really?

>>128398550
Realistically, if crime were to drop wouldn't most police officers lose their jobs? I wonder what sort of ramifications that would bring about

>>128401081
If crime were to drop, police officers lose their jobs, less police around to kill people.

OP gets what he wants, it all works out.

File: La Adelita de la revolution Mexicana.jpg (61KB, 500x710px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 500x710px

>>128401081
Naw, we would just make more laws to make more criminals.

>>128401195
>cops lose their job and resort to crime
Like pottery

>>128401195

This solution is only practical in LaLa land, you silly kike.

>>128401296
Damn, I guess we really shouldn't try to reduce crime rate then. We should increase it so we can have more cops!

>>128400923
They dont have a lot of recoil, its just space marine bolters are fucking huge.
But >>128400199 is wrong in that there are in fact bolter patterns made for use by humans. Commissars, Inquisitors, Imperial Officers etc.

>>128400837

This isn't a philosophy debate you fucking fag. Yes cops Have to abide by certain rules. Jesus Christ.

>>128397451
>Criminal death by cop
>Cop deaths go up
>Cop employment rates go down
>Innocent death by criminal goes up

File: 1466523656995.gif (2MB, 200x133px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 200x133px

>>128400837
>finger on the trigger

>>128397451
Black people use PCP, you pretty much have to be ready to put them in the dirt.

>>128397451
>Why are police allowed to use guns with bullets, as opposed to sandbags? Ever been shot by a sandbag?

Gun nut weighing in

1) A bean bag round can severely injure or kill in a wide variety of ways.

2) bean bag rounds are wildly inaccurate at distances greater than 20 feet. A suspect 20 yards away with a pistol will kill the officer.

3) They have less stopping power than a 9mm

4) Since it's viewed as "less than lethal" you are more likely to be shot by one. Increased shootings will occur. This phenomenon has also happened because of police body cams as officers now know they are justified in shootings.

5) The firearm that uses these are a shotgun. Black people are going to be chimping the fuck out if they have shotguns pointed at them.

Regardless of what I say here... Perhaps the officers in England should be given these. Better than nothing.

>>128400551

police are humans and all humans have the right to self defense up to and including lethal force

>>128400199
Arbites have their own even more fancy weapon.

File: Screen Shot 2017-06-04 at 5.55.24 PM.png (120KB, 836x432px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 836x432px

read for castle-doctrine keks

File: 1446281615925.webm (2MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x360px

>>128397451
>Why are police allowed to use guns with bullets, as opposed to sandbags?

That's a stupid question.....

If police don't use bullets then they would have to use there much more expensive cars to kill those fucking criminal niggers.

>>128398130
Way to lack in critical thinking skills.

>>128405269
that video

>stop resisting

File: 561b231b2981307e88faebf3c93fdbc2.jpg (66KB, 640x920px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 640x920px

>>128400551
Bitch, the right to bear arms is constitutional. I get what ur saying about sandbags n shit but stop being such a tard

>>128402142

File: 1445757545070.webm (2MB, 492x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 492x360px

>>128405383

Police here hate it when niggers resist arrest.