Should you be free to do whatever you want as long as it doesn't

In theory yes

No

Africa

File: Natural border.jpg (38KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 600x450px

You should be free to do whatever you want as long as it doesn't violate someone else's freedom to do whatever they want.
This freedom includes the ability to separate yourself from people who do what you do not want.

>>128394473
>Africa

Tribes have more freedoms? Is it because of the small population size?

>>128394648
Ask my HOA if I can build a wooden fence. They say no. I can look through five backyards. No one has privacy, all these yards are clean but bare, and all these houses are cookie cutter.

I can't build wall at home. :(

>>128394252
Underage children and animals still cannot consent.

>>128394686
its because the governments are poor as shit so whatever says goes. it ends up being survival of the strongest nig

>>128394901
That's just anarchy, not libertarianism.

African shitholes are a poor example because they violate one another's lives and freedoms on a regular basis.

>>128395230
libertarianism?

I just answered his questions

>>128394759
next time get a HOA who arent fucking libshit cucks and get to know your HOA decently before making a monumental decision like home ownership

>>128395230
Libertarianism is a shitty meme based on minarchist (negative) ideas

Classical liberalism is better

>>128395466
Do you like that you have to say that? To tell someone to just find a better HOA? It's just really gross that they exist.

If I want to opt out, build something on my own property, and not deal with pissed off people getting a city ordinance shoved in my face, that'll be cool. That'd be freedom.