Vote for Policies Thread!
It's a test that will ask you to vote for a set of policies each belonging to the latest manifesto of each political party. Parties are kept anonymous until you finish the test.
Just take the test here:
https://voteforpolicies.org.uk/
Then post results, rate, comment, and hate on each other.
The test can be a bit too long so remember to bump the thread while you are taking the test!
Oh, and if the test asks you for a postcode, just use this one: W1A 0AX
Let's see now what the true colors of /pol/ are.
Here are mine:
https://voteforpolicies.org.uk/survey/results/AQnZQD6ixDLZhQuEu#/personal-results
Conservatives: 42.9%
UKIP: 21.4%
Labour: 14.3%
Liberal Democrats: 14.3%
Green Party: 7.1%
Remember to bump if you are taking the test!
somebody else bump please!
https://voteforpolicies.org.uk/survey/results/LyOwyg6hVEqqTAu6u#/personal-results
Alrighty I did it
>>128335659
>75% UKIP
>25% Conservative
kek, classic /pol/
Not OP, but this seems like a nice thread. Bumping
>>128336663
What can I say, Nige is my guy
>>128339560
I like the guy, but some of his party's policies are a bit too much, like "withdrawal from the Paris Agreement", the ""withdrawal from the European Court of Human Rights, or "Non-urgent NHS care only for British citizens or foreign nationals who have paid UK taxes for at least 5 years".
bumping again
>>128340203
Why should people who didn't pay into the health system receive non-urgent care? If they have an issue that isn't urgent then they can get it treated back home. As I recall European Courts have a bit of a reputation for corruption, and I believe the idea behind that policy to keep those courts from crying bigot when the U.K. decides to take the terrorist threat seriously. Paris Agreement I'm neutral on, America wanted out and got out but Britain likely has less at stake so they're best off staying in.
>>128336663
i got the same