this guy is a fucking joke lmao...tucker asked him to specifically

>>128146870
Respond to every criticism of Trump's reasons for leaving here: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/06/02/fact-checking-trump-speech-paris-climate-agreement/102399674/ and then maybe someone will reply to your retarded ass.

B um p

File: 1490512113366s.jpg (9KB, 220x250px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 220x250px

>>128147386
you mad shekelstein?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZcIG5Bf3__g

>>128147386
>https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/06/02/fact-checking-trump-speech-paris-climate-agreement/102399674
that article still doesnt explain why china should get a free pass untill 2030 dipshit...

>>128148558

The only way I've ever heard liberals/leftists rebut this is basically "w-well white countries already had and used their opportunity to pollute, so its only fair"

Seriously I'm not joking, these were real statements from professors in a conservation class I had to take for my "international perspectives" REQUIREMENT

>>128147386
how come nobody wants to support a USA Climate Accord and invest in other countries in the United States?

>>128149137
technology has advanced so much since the US industiral age, even when the US was at its worse in terms of pollution , it doesnt even come close to how bad things are in china now, not even close.

>>128148558
I mean it's not like the US moved any of their production to China, bring those jobs back. How much do you think shit would cost if you had to pay your employees $20k/year instead of a beating?

>>128149610

I know I'm not defending them by any means. This is just what I have seen as a response.

Always comes down to WELL WHITEY DID IT 2 SO DAT MAKES IT OKAY

It is cheaper to not give a fuck about the environment, but it makes no sense to even have china and india on board if they don't have to even regard the agreement in the slightest

hmmm... why could it be the western world is put in shackles, while the third world is allowed to do as they please and catch up? Who could this be serving the interests of? rly maeks u thik

>>128147386
>A list of fact checks and nitpicks
>Criticisms

The only thing there is the liabilities of leaving the accord. The accord has no teeth. No requirements. No obligations beyond submitting a report of what you are going to do. Not even a penalty if you fail to follow through. Everything is self reported. The US would be funneling money for the umpteenth time into africa and asia at the behest of the EU. For the umpteenth time the result will be "need more gibs plz"

>>128150376
I heard this exact argument 5 times already. Those idiots don't realize that solar panels and wind turbines didn't exist during the industrial revolution. They are criticizing the US for not using technology that didn't exist.

>>128149901
Id rather spend a little bit more for a quality product that would last a long time, that i also knew helped provide jobs for my countrymen, than buy a shitty BPA loaded plastic peice of shit that will break in one month that was built by a slave

K

>>128151463
>more money better = better quality

>build factory in the US, pay more for construction costs, pay more for labor costs, probably pay more taxes and more money for regulations

>build exact same factory in China, employ 105 IQ ubermenschen according to /pol/ standards, pay less, sell for less