>a board of NEETs believes they're smarter than 97% of

nice redtext

((((scientists))))

>>128136354
the same amount of """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""experts""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" gave trump a winning chance of 1% and guess who's president of the usa today faggot

world:0
/pol/: every point ever to exist

>>128136354
>an american believes the media

really makes you thinks

>>128136354

>97% of world scientists

[citation required]

But I guess an agreement that allows China (who produces twice as much "carbon emission" as the US) and India (who produced half as much) not being required to curb their emissions at all while the US is required to curb theirs by more than 25%, while also promising billions of dollars from the US to China and India was going to save the planet.

File: Cook.gif (33KB, 560x219px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 560x219px

>>128136354
Anyone who believes the 97% meme is a fucking idiot.

>tfw to intelligent for 97% of scientists

>>128136354
Science is just a meme. Do you also believe the Earth is round? Stop being an ignorant sheeple.

>>128136354
So what if a pack of trillionaires decided to fund a project that could alter the climate manually?

File: holocaust fact check.jpg (80KB, 1023x731px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 1023x731px

97% of scientists think the Holocaust is real. I guess that makes it so.

>>128136354
how many genders do these scientists believe in?

File: 1493667186679.jpg (49KB, 736x730px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 736x730px

>>128136354
HOLY SHIT WE ARE ALL DOOMED!!!!
(((SCIENTIST))) SAY THE PLANET WILL GET 2 TENTHS OF A DEGREE WARMER BY 2100!!!
HOLY FUCK ITS HAPPENING!!!!

>>128136354
I've been reading Leviathan to my son. It's just okay.

We were drawn in by the excellent European map renderings. The story doesn't match their impressiveness.

Actually it's millions of cucks convinced that 97% is a real number but are too stupid to look it up themselves. True story.

File: 1334800320071.jpg (33KB, 400x267px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 400x267px

>>128136354
97% of climate scientists, not all scientists.

File: 97ofCartoonist.gif (14KB, 560x250px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 560x250px

>>128136630
also related
The most popular media promoted "consensus" was created by a cartoonist which was based on an earlier hack job.

File: pepe3765.png (126KB, 402x398px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 402x398px

>>128136646
>Mar 20, 2014

>>128136534
fuck off you revisionist asshole. no one here gave trump a chance. we wanted it more than anything but very few gave him a chance in hell. also equating accepted science with political polling is retarded

>>128136354
These are the same scientists who assert that race is a social construct.

File: IMG_3582.jpg (28KB, 397x360px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 397x360px

>>128136540
The 97% meme is, of course, a myth. It's more like 1/3 don't believe, 1/3 don't know, and 1/3 think humans actually will destroy the Earth due to climate change. But with the amount of scientists that have come out saying their data was wrongly manipulated to fit political/special interests really makes me think

>>128136354
>muh 97%
Get fucked

File: 1490314015234.gif (518KB, 319x220px) Image search: [Google]

518KB, 319x220px

>>128136354
Funny, because 97% of the world's scientists work for a plucky band of billionaires and oil companies.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (77KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 1280x720px

>>128137323
>no one here gave trump a chance
>accepted science
i'd point you to reddit, but i think i know where you came from already

>>128137476
>But with the amount of scientists that have come out saying their data was wrongly manipulated to fit political/special interests really makes me think
source?

>>128137555
great argument

>>128137323
>no one here gave trump a chance
>ignoring how /pol/ said Trump would win over Rust Belt whites the Democrats were alienating
Have your (You) and fuck off

>>128136354
Please link the list of 100% of the world's scientists.

>>128136354
>4 out of 5 dentistist recommend

I love how readily they treat a shitty hypothesis as religious doctrine based not on any real understanding of the natural systems involved or hard data, but instead on consensus and authority. Real children of the enlightenment they are.

>>128137323
But at Evergreen State University, where I went to school called the subject political science. Explain.

>>128136354
>97% of scientists included in the survey because of their outspoken climate change religious beliefs.
Fixed that for you.

>>128136354
Wasn't it 98% last time? Have 1% seen the light?

Heh just like Bill Nye is a (((scientist))) right?

>>128137742
>Who loves climate?
>I DO I DO
>Sugar-free climate?
>I DO I DO

>>128136354
That's absolutely untrue. 97% conceded that carbon has some effect on the atmosphere, to what extent or whether it's objectively negative is not agreed upon.

File: 1489595649656.jpg (134KB, 860x600px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 860x600px

>>128136354
>scream at Trump since the day he announced he was running for office
>slander him with every possible untruth
>be part of a demographic who votes 99.99999999% for Hillary
>break down into histrionics when he wins
>continue lying and screaming hysterically about everything he does or doesn't do
>expect him to ever listen to your opinion on policy

wew fucking lad

What the outrage mob refuses to accept is that yes, we should all be lowering our emissions to fight climate change, but the Paris Accord was still retarded as fuck and it's a good thing we left.

>>128137133

>got his information from leftist propaganda that has since been debunked

Huh.

>>128136354

first off this board is mostly law enforcement

second off /pol is always right

>>128137162
got a problem with that white boi?

>>128136459
>136459▶
>((((scientists))))

/thread

>>128136354
Wasn't it 34%? The vast majority refused to sign it.

>>128137925
You are almost there bro let me lead you the rest of the way take the ultimate red pill

https://www.quora.com/Is-there-physical-scientific-proof-that-Jews-were-gassed-to-death-in-Nazi-concentration-camps/answer/Damian-Graves

File: tmp_12441-1496324561693942274383.jpg (58KB, 622x626px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 622x626px

>>128137323
Absolute horseshit.

>>128137536
Yeah, they are essentially just trying to flip the industry and retain power.
They hate off-grid and want to jam everyone into cities.

Know the boner about bicycles?
That is NOT about the environment in itself but about the ability to jam more commuters into a smaller space... and sell them centralized energy for their homes/workspaces.

File: 729.gif (137KB, 340x340px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 340x340px

>>128137634
great buttmad about hillary losing

if the average scientist is like shill nye the (((science))) guy i can positvely say, yes i am smarter than that

File: IMG_0300.gif (80KB, 248x203px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 248x203px

>>128136947
Exactly, scientists are a bunch of nerdy faggots with agendas. The earth has been getting warm so they equate it to humans and think the solution is to stunt societies advancement.

The earth has been getting hot and cold for fucking ever. I'm sure when the ice age was ending the native Americans thought it was due to new corn shits

Fuck off "science"

File: 1495225068015.jpg (44KB, 410x410px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 410x410px

>>128136354
The climate IS changing, it always has and always will. We're on the verge of a new ice age too, but I think the main thing that people are disagreeing with is the notion that humans are the cause of it.

This subject has popped up because Trump pulled out of the Parice Climate agreement. People are claiming that it's because Trump doesn't believe climate change is real, even though the agreement itself was complete bullshit and that's why he really pulled America out of it.

https://youtu.be/8qhUTH8BLOs
>intellectuals

>>128137831
I have always heard 97 get thrown around. Can't remember ever hearing 98. I wouldn't be surprised if there were people saying 98 percent, but I think its just as likely your are mistaken.

>>128136354
>3% of climate scientists respond to a survey
>97% of them agree that global climate change is man-made
(((97% of scientists concur)))

>>128136354
When did Trump say he pulled out of the climate deal because he didn't believe in it? Jesus FUCKIONGSDJIHOFOISDKH CHRIST, I am getting tired of these brainless CUNTS. He promised he'd protect American jobs, this is doing just that, these taxes would kill American jobs. If Americans don't like this reality they should have considered voting for Hilary instead, the dumb CUNTS.

>>128138332
Funny you said that b/c yesterday our electric company sent out a guy to change our meter to a new digital one that is suppose to help them go green.

File: Screenshot_20170602-093445~2.png (172KB, 1018x461px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 1018x461px

>>128136354
Read it yourself. The countries contributing the most emissions will only agree to do so for financial compensation. I say we out sanctions on the countries or send in military instead.

Link to MIT study
https://globalchange.mit.edu/sites/default/files/newsletters/files/2015%20Energy%20%26%20Climate%20Outlook.pdf

>>128138728
>When did Trump say he pulled out of the climate deal because he didn't believe in it?
Pretty much every time he talked or tweeted about climate change he has said it wasn't real or it was a conspiracy.
Seriously, how the fuck do you just block out reality like that?

>>128138761
The energy used to extract resources, manufacture, ship, and install those meters would never be repaid before they break. It's a scam.

They want to use those as an excuse to charge people more money.

>>128136534

Imperial truth right there brother.

Death to the Jew (((experts)))

Death to their henchmen the nigger

File: determined.png (371KB, 439x582px) Image search: [Google]

371KB, 439x582px

On all fronts the Paris Accord is the most retarded thing penned by a Frenchmen.

First off, it's more a political spiel than a scientific document. Go read it, it goes on about LGBTQ+ rights and niggers in Nigeria.

Secondly, it gives Exemptions to China and India until 2040 - using a bogus "developing country" argument despite China being the second largest economy and THE largest producer of CO2 emissions.

Finally - let's say that Scientists haven't consistently exaggerated Climate Change since the "Global Cooling" nonsense in the 1970s.

Let's say that if we don't follow the Paris Accord we'll all die horrible horrible deaths and get chased by blizzards like in the Day After Tomorrow.

The document is ENTIRELY SYMBOLIC, meaning it doesn't actually do ANYTHING to begin with.

It's LITERALLY Virtue Signaling and a tax scam, and you don't have to be a pill mill scientist to realize that.

>>128136354
https://youtu.be/SSrjAXK5pGw

>>128138938
Yeah, when I was growing up the classic meter houses have lasted 30+ years.

>>128137935
I would go one step further and insert the word potential in front of climate change. Funny how if you are ok with making an effort to reduce our environmental impact, but don't believe that an apocalypse is around the corner you are considered a evil science denier.

>>128138973
>niggers in Nigeria
Is it racist to call a nigger a nigger in Niger?

>>128137133
What the fuck are you talking about.

>>128136354
>97%
What fields of study were these scientists picked from?
What were the questions given to them?
What level did they agree/disagree?
You can't just throw bullshit numbers into the air without a goddamn source and expect people to go along.

>>128136354
Science is either 100% or nothing.

File: 1492115681659.jpg (68KB, 699x485px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 699x485px

>all the butthurt in this thread

>>128137476
It's not even that much. The number was derived from the percentage that even responded to the question "is climate change anthropogenic?" The vast majority did not respond and if the fraction that did agree it was something to be countered, 97% said it was anthropogenic. Most of these weren't even climatologists. I'm looking up the proofs, I'll find it here in a minute. Consensus is not how science works anyway and that's the actual anti intellectual problem now. I know the meat doesn't spontaneously make flies because I can repeat the same experiments and get the same results, not because we all agree it doesn't.

I don't know man. For the US election we had Nobels, media, Hollywood, artists against us, essentially the top of the crop of communication and they lost.

CLIMATE SCIENTOLOGY IS THE EU STATE RELIGION
THE USA REJECTS YOUR FALSE RELIGIOUS CULT
KILL YOURSELF OP!!!

>>128136354
>be scientist who finds evidence against the narrative on climate change
>try to get grant

good luck w/ that. It's hard getting a grant to say nothing is happening. A lot easier to get money for telling ppl the sky's falling and world governance will help

>>128137476
>>128139328
Here's a normie level overview of why it's crap like "1 in 4 college women get raped".

http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexepstein/2015/01/06/97-of-climate-scientists-agree-is-100-wrong/

>>128139576
Please remember to archive. Thank you.

>http://forbes com/sites/alexepstein/2015/01/06/97-of-climate-scientists-agree-is-100-wrong
https://archive.is/6gupM

>>128139452
It's possible. Everywhere outside Western Europe and the Anglosphere.

>>128138761
>>128138938
This is the dumbest shit I have ever heard. You fucking retards have your heads so far up your asses. Digital meters don't save an appreciable amount of energy (but the analog Vs digital is more robust and efficient). It allows the company to transition to a smart grid that has the capability of matching output with demand.

Your levels of paranoia and retardation are exactly what I would expect from a Trump cock sucking climate change deniers.

>>128139618
I have far less first-hand experience there, but I imagine you're right. I always wondered how dark-ages happened--how humans could just all agree at the same time that they were going to ignore truth for the sake of dogma, and do it with a straight fact. Seeing the modern state of climate science, I don't wonder anymore.

>>128138923
Trump has also said he would like to see efforts made to clean the air and clean the water. He isn't 100% against initiatives that improve the environment. Its also just his style to say something "outrageous" like climate change is a conspiracy to get peoples attention. Especially if we are talking about tweets. Its unreasonable to expect him to provide a lot of policy details in 140 characters; however, he can easily get peoples attention with a 140 character shit post. Climate change agreements like the Paris one are a scam/conspiracy. I am ok with trying to reduce our environmental impact, but the Paris agreement is not the way to go about it.

>>128138973
Like anyone bitching about the US pulling out has actually read the Paris document. Like you outlined, China and India being exempt for over two decades is the biggest red-flag there is. If these people were truly concerned about carbon emissions and truly want to make a change, they should be calling for mass genocide instead. Anything less is merely posturing.

>>128139289
>can't throw numbers into the air without a source and expect people to go along.
It's been working well so far.

File: IMG_2234.jpg (76KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 640x640px

>>128136354
https://friendsofscience.org
Start reading.

>>128139601
What's wrong with Forbes, guy? They're pretty balanced and not clickbait. Why would I shill a two year old article?

>>128139942
Trump even threw the ball in the liberals' court by telling them he'd be willing to come to a new agreement that isn't unfair bullshit that just fucks over US industries.

Of course, they won't fucking do that, because the whole goddamn POINT of the paris agreement is to cripple first world industries while siphoning donation money and industry over to the 3rd world. But the point is that these people bitching about DRUMPF IS GOING TO KILL THE PLANET should try to come up with a real solution.

>>128138818
China wants billions of dollars to start reducing their emissions by 2030. They're considered a fucking developing country under the agreement, which allows them to get so many shekels. It's a scam.

>>128136354
Wasn't the "97%" of scientists only 79 people? I recall around 8000 - 9000 scientists were asked, over half didn't give any reply on the issue and around 3000 did (didn't say what the reply was). Then they took 79 out of the 3000, 77 which agreed about climate change caused by people, and 2 which disagreed. Then paraded the 97% meme which we see today.

I wish I saved the image.

>>128138173
It lost the popular vote?

>>128138297
That's a really good summary of all the pieces we already knew

File: legates.png (303KB, 601x455px) Image search: [Google]

303KB, 601x455px

>>128140345
yes, the 97% lie was discredited by the first researcher to look at the same dataset.

>>128139715
Uh, how is this even related? I thought all new electricity meters were digital. And they force you to replace meters (both electric and water) every few years anyway, at least here.
>>128139804
It really depends on the country. In some places you'd be shunned for genetic modification research, in others for disagreeing with the climate consensus. It's not like there's a country which is so open-minded that it permits everything, there's always some political agenda pushing on science.

>>128136354
>doesn't realize that half the scientists asked to respond declined

File: tmp_30362-1495108022653383113029.jpg (250KB, 1018x1024px) Image search: [Google]

250KB, 1018x1024px

>>128136354
New hire to shareblue? Welcome to pol. Have some redpills

These scientists are like stans dad in southpark
>climate change
>cue "oh i know what im talking about im a geologist

File: 98_percent_climate_scientists_graph.png (11KB, 495x460px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 495x460px

>>128140345
I got you senpai

>>128140345
Yes good goy get all your opinions from facebook infographs *rubs hands together*

>>128140508
>there's always some political agenda pushing on science.
This is what normies can't believe because they don't want to accept it. They think science is pure knowledge. HAH politics begin between lab partners and spreads from there. There is not a single step between science and you that isn't tainted by politics, except maybe some pure physics research and the like.

>>128140659
Yes good goy get all your opinions from the jewish media and talmudvision

>>128136354
Corporations and billionaires are overwhelmingly in favour of it though. Once again the lefts greatest enemy is the working class.

>>128140345
They shat out a bunch of surveys to "scientists" across the board. So there are two problems
1) The stat implies we're talking about CLIMATOLOGISTS when in reality, it just means literally any scientist, in any field, who may or may not know a single thing about the climate. It's like asking a physician what they think about astrophysics.
2) the design of the survey is flawed, because it relies on response bias. The people bothering to respond are going to be the ones who care the most, ie, the believers.
3) the survey used a rating scale that was basically saying "on a scale of 0-10, how much do you think humanity contributes to global warming?". Any answer besides 0 gets counted as "scientists agree in global warming". Even if you only score it a 1 and think it's a very slight impact.

>>128136354
it's like playing with legos, sure you might be capable of building something nice, but only if you have all the legos.

>>128136354
You mean 97% of 40% of scientists contacted that replied?

>>128136534
Do you guys actually know what a chance is?

>>128136354
>be a scientist
>need funding for studies/experiments
>government can fund you the money necessary (who has mining lobby paying for their wives second holiday home as a gift)
>or go with private organisation which usually has an agenda and if your data comes up against that, your findings never get published

>>128140345
I don't have the exact numbers on hand, but this is the general idea. Essentially, the vast majority of research on the subject is inconclusive, or at most concludes that while climate change exists, it is not necessarily anthrocentric. The (((media))) eliminates this from their statistics (removing well over 90% of the data points from the pool in the process) and cites only the pool of research that specifically affirms or denies anthrocentric climate change. From that heavily reduced pool, it is correct to say that the large majority of them affirm anthrocentric climate change.

QRD: 90% of 5% of scientists agree that humans are causing global warming.

>>128140659
>implying carbon taxes isn't the most jewish thing ever thought of

>>128139204
The "97% consensus" narrative is based on a keyword search of journal abstracts performed by this cartoonist. His work could not be replicated by a real scientist. It is based on similar fraudulent methodology by Oreskes who is a historian. Both built their notoriety off climate alarmism.

>>128140711
>pure physics research
By the way, does anybody have photos of those posters about lgbtbbq acceptance in CERN that were vandalized?

>>128140937
>mexican intellectuals

>>128136354
kill yourself shill rat

File: Mexico JUST.png (610KB, 662x654px) Image search: [Google]

610KB, 662x654px

>>128140937
P R O M I N E N T

M E X I C A N

I N T E L L E C T U A L S

>>128140930
Even less man, 75 out of 10,257
See:
>>128140599

97%'s should just go hang themselves in their mother's basements.

>>128141076
>>128141227
So do you know or not?

>>128136540
Goverment of China and India are going balls to the walls with renewables. Theyre literally ditching coal to make room solar.

>>128140920
Wow. You're excellent post relating this topic to a children's toy really convinces me. Thanks!

>>128141458
Asking the definition of a word as a rhetorical device is a bad-faith question. IOW, you know what he was saying, and your question doesn't change the point. Improve.

>>128141516
They're not either, they're actually on track to build hundreds of new HELE coal fired power plants. China and India only use renewables for meme points and prodding up toxic industries (since westerners buy solar panels from them)

>>128136354
And the shocking revelation is: The board of NEET's have been right about 99% of the things that the board of NEET's have said ever.

Period.

Really forces one to ponder.

>>128136354
>plucky

What a fucking faggot.

>>128136354
>97% of all scientists
>counting sociologists as scientists

>>128137323

Speak for yourself, shill. I won big money by betting on Trump for POTUS.

Wrong.

I'm smarter than 100%.

>>128136354
They have a list of every scientist in the world? Sauce?

>>128136534

>Polls are science

Literally kill yourself.

>>128141615
>arguing in good-faith on pol
l m f a o

>>128141991
Mathematical models are science.

Remember when 100% of scientists thought the Earth was the center of the solar system? Remember 100% of scientists thought the Earth was flat? Remember when they thought the ozone layer would be gone by now? Remember how almost everything they've ever known has proven to be bullshit?

Plot idea: Half the population concludes the proposed solutions to a problem are ineffective and doesn't want to waste time and money on them, meanwhile, the other half of the population continually accuses them of not believing the problem exists.

97% of the worlds 3rd world African Warlords give zero fucks about using the $100 Billion toward actual climate goals for their countries.

>>128141739
This

>>128142063
>being so new that you don't know how to wade through shit to get to quality

I want to say you're better than this, but you're probably not.

>>128138297
Holy shit. I always new the facts around WWII are biased, but Jesus, I didn't know how bad it was.

File: 12705-under-normal-circumstances-id-say-i-told-you-so-but-as.png (474KB, 612x612px) Image search: [Google]

474KB, 612x612px

>>128136354

> OP thinks Bill Nye is a real scientist, instead of an actor reading a script full of words he doesn't understand

>>128136354
How easy would it be to control the world through "scientists"?

>>128136354
What crisis?
>hurr a fucking planet is gettibg warmer overtime

This rock was once an ice ball.

>>128136354
We already were smarther than the 90+% of 'experts' predicting a Hillary win.

>>128142164
I used to come here for discussion
now I come here for the shitposts
I'm a level above you
soon you will see
that /pol/ discussions are fruitless
and a meaningless endeavour

>>128142117
Everyone should watch Styx.

>>128136354
>1514 AD
>99.9% of scientists believed the sun and planets revolved around the earth

>>128140937
Of course, Paco. Because unlike you, I speak English.

>>128136354


At no point in history have 97% of scientists believed in AGW

File: 1496240467236.gif (446KB, 300x186px) Image search: [Google]

446KB, 300x186px

>>128142093
desu

>>128136354
Consensus isn't science you fucking retard, it's politics, also this>>128141025
and this>>128140345
Fuck obongo leaf this entire thread has you BTFO
sage

>>128136354
/pol/ is not one person, anon.

File: germancucks.jpg (13KB, 600x552px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 600x552px

>>128142299
I used to come here for discussion
then I came here for the shitposts
now I am able to detect sincerity from trolling
I'm miles above you
it will take you a while to see-maybe you never will-that /pol/ discussions are a mix, and you must be able to judge quality
and only Germancucks can't find meaning in life anymore, so your suicide totally makes sense.

>>128136354
>muh NINETYSEVENNN

that number has been debunked a zillion times

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kotqWXZkZS0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSrjAXK5pGw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTTaXqVEGkU

>>128136630
So a stay at home dad that does jack shit but pads his online resume to cover for his gambling and cricket obsession.

File: 695.png (101KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 640x640px

>An ice age is a period of long-term reduction in the temperature of Earth's surface and atmosphere, resulting in the presence or expansion of continental and polar ice sheets and alpine glaciers.
>resulting in the presence or expansion of continental and polar ice sheets and alpine glaciers.
>resulting in the presence of continental and polar ice sheets

>We are literally on the tail end of an Ice Age
>An Ice Age is literally defined by polar ice caps
>The end of an Ice Age is literally signified by the polar caps melting
>People are somehow attributing the ending of the current ice age to humans, despite the fact that it began thawing when there was roughly 200,000 people in the world

I literally don't understand how the hysteria got so far in the face of the obvious reality. By every scientific reality we are in the final stages of the Holocene Ice Age. No shit the ice is melting, we're coming out of an Ice Age.

>>128136354
>a board of NEETs believes they're smarter than 97% of world scientists
Got anything besides an appeal to authority fallacy to offer?

File: qt muslim (1).jpg (74KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 640x640px

>>128142648
I have long since been
able to distinguish
sincerity from trolling
but the sincere posts
are trash as well
so really
is there any difference?

I believe in man-made climate change, but the paris agreement was garbage. Not to mention climate scientist don't know shit about politics/law/economics.

>>128136354
to be fare while OPs pic makes this out to be about money all eco friendly tech is about money

ethanol was about money and it wasnt even on paper a good idea. america using farmland for corn to make fuel that it will have to transport back and forth burning fuel the entire time. the only reason it works in brazil is they use sugar cane. we cant grow sugar cane in america

>>128141991
The 97% of scientists claim is from a poll.

>>128136354
Refute on of them that Paris Accord is shit, then:

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/environment/2015/dec/12/james-hansen-climate-change-paris-talks-fraud

>>128138748
Cnn is making the connection through a tweet from like 2014 where he says the "hoaxers are changing the term Global Warmimg to Climate Change." That is really all they have.

>>128136354
>he believes everything (((scientists))) tell him
They're leading you all straight to hell, m8

>>128137570
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4192182/World-leaders-duped-manipulated-global-warming-data.html

>>128136354
this is bait
but everything we know is not certain though

>>128136354
whats up with all those "97%"
read at least 4 times today "97% of x is y"

Oi goys, you better join our organization and pay shekels to keep the world from going destroyed, just look what schlomo a (((scientist))) who agrees with me. That giant hole on our ozone layer might be fix, but it could return anytime goy.

>>128142911
Ethanol is shittiest idea you can imagine.

This seems like a perfect time to use that Always Sunny clip about science.

File: download (10).jpg (14KB, 187x269px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 187x269px

>>128136354
This plot has already been done, see pic related. (((They))) killed him for it.

>>128144081
fancy way of saying "almost all"

>>128142761
You'd think assholes would understand this, and that we can prove it from geological record and petrified trees from the start of humanity to now, but bill nye says there won't be another ice age again so never have babies but make sure to use your sex junk oh oh oh!

>>128136354
Nobody cares, commie. It's freedom or extinction. Why the fuck do you think we have nukes?

>>128145124
>Mediasaurus
Love it!

>>128142813
Not if you're just another depressed German.

>>128142087
Mathematical models are math. Falsifiable experiments are science.

>>128141516
China is building a new GW range coal fired power plant once a week.

File: 1494523496896.jpg (34KB, 784x349px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 784x349px

>>128136354

>>128136534
You're so fucking dumb...
How can you not forget to breathe?

>>128136354

Not all scientists are climate scientists. The ones that are climate scientists get paid them climate bux and have a huge stake in this.

You have private companies/indivudals getting paid large sums of government money and if they come out with something that concludes it's not in our hands, the money stops. Period.

Weither it is true or not, you're not going to know from these people.

File: 1331050057517.jpg (39KB, 500x388px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 500x388px

>>128149503

>>128137323
>no one here gave trump a chance.
Explain why I won a ton of money on him becoming the President.

>>128139601
>I thought he was joking when he said he just took short naps between archiving

File: Sheep5.jpg (266KB, 1600x1043px) Image search: [Google]

266KB, 1600x1043px

>>128136354
Idiot liberal detected.
Go be a sheep somewhere else...

>>128141397
>it's even worse than I thought
>I now wonder how bad things really are
jfk_meme.png

Science!©™
t. Shill Nye and Black Science Mane

>>128136630
This is the most important post.
The entire 97% scientists lie was created by a cartoonist.

>>128136354
Did they or did they not fake the research for the last decade in order to exaggerate the apparent danger?

I go to the best state uni in my state... for what it's worth. I'm a geology major. Undergrad... no expert... generally though when climate change comes up my professor's treat man made climate change as a near total non entity given the Earth's volatile 4.5 billion years of history vs. 200 years of industrialization.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjmtSkl53h4

>THIS many scientists believe it!
Science isn't a democracy.

>>128136354
>predict global warming in the 70s
>continue to push estimates back as deadlines for natural disasters come and go
>ridicule anyone with conflicting data and never allow scientific debate
It's not that I think 98% of scientists have been paid off, it's more likely that 2% were paid off and 96% of scientists have no idea, go with the flow, and/or haven't tested anything outside of provided testing structures for measuring climate.
It's also highly likely that there are multiple variables not being accounted for when testing and compiling data.
>continental glaciers have been receding for 10000+ years
>we start to monitor this a little over 100 years ago
>they expect us to believe that it's 100% man's fault

>>128136540
it comes from a fraudulent peer reviewed study that estimated the consensus by the % of climate papers that held a certain opinion. To no suprise among us here most of the those papers listed were actually neautral to or even against catastrophic global warming.

basically its a meme whos source is a fraud study. Even though its been proven in actual court cases filed to be a fraud they still spam the 97% meme.

>>128136354
Plot idea, we keep polluting the environment more and more so that it actually does start changing the climate and everything on this god forsaken planet dies like it should.

>>128153036
>>128152952

This guy beat me to it.

>>128141516
China practically burns coal recreationally you retarded faggot

>>128152549
Savage, but you still have to go back.

File: 1437419864203.jpg (135KB, 733x741px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 733x741px

>>128136354

>rich banks and corperations have also been exposed before

>/pol/ doesn't learn form history, but think in terms of conspiracies

suprise suprise

>>128136354
The funny thing is if the science is so settled why do we keep paying these guys to confirm climate? change they already confirmed it. Where are all the doctors running around saying need fund more penicillin research

>>128153372
hey if 'its good info , ill save it.

>>128136354
ummm, where is the worldwide scientists registry?

File: download.jpg (9KB, 243x208px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 243x208px

I've been on /pol/ for three years, aint no scientist gonna tell me how much crap I can put into the air! Just like aint no doctor gonna tell me how many burgers I can stuff down my gullet!

It's a free country, asshole!

I have the internet, I'm smarter then 97% of those SCIENCEKEKS and Trump, Milo, AND Gavin McInnis all told me climate change 'aint even real, SO IT AINT.

End of story, SCIENCEKEKS BTFO!

>>128138492

Even though he stated in his address that he would like to renegotiate it. A strong leader knows how to say no. People are fucking stupid.

Trump should execute scientists in public.

File: L man.png (327KB, 750x600px) Image search: [Google]

327KB, 750x600px

I hate how everyone here is so fucking stupid and sticking with "NO NO NO, THIS IS THE % SMART PEOPLE ARE ON MY SIDE, LEL ITS TRUTH"

So let me don my brain and give you guys a good ole whoopin#

Pic related is me

We all agree the planet is getting more eratic climate. There are cycles of Ice Ages/ fluctuations of warmer/ cooler parts of centuries.

But science is claiming that the rate of change is astronomically different. The easiest explanation is that the rate of change is in parallel with the introduction of high scale industry/ carbon emissions.

Who gives a fuck about what % of scientists are on your side; these are the facts. The world's climate is changing at a rate that is alarming since it seems that knocking the balance this off course might not allow the natural cycle to bounce us back.

>>128146804
>>128154747
>>128152044
>>128139351


>this is what /pol/ actually believes

>>128137323
/pol/ had the highest concentration of people betting on trump, whether they liked him or not (this may or may not be true, but i'm saying it anyways)... (i just read a coupld of your (you)'s that said they betted on trump, so now i know i'm right)

>>128136354
The only thing pol believes in is being cynical and contrarian to literally everything.

>>128144081
97% is the new 6million

File: dogbless.webm (2MB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 300x300px

>>128154454
USA USA USA USA

File: 1481291746837.png (85KB, 480x377px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 480x377px

>>128136354
Don't be absurd, scientists are shills. You get whatever (((results))) you pay for.

File: IMG_0466.jpg (23KB, 290x326px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 290x326px

>mfw the "consensus"