>>128053218
How does preventing the spreading of child pornography make it harder for young people to sexually experiment? Unless they considered the ability to watch child pornography a form of sexual experimentation...

>>128053218
because children arent competent to give concent.

it is not entirely different from having sex with someone who is mentally damaged and so is unaware of what you are doing.

and all of this for your own gratification.

is psychopathic aggressive and immoral.

and all of that without even explaining the personal degradation and disgust entailed with pedophilia.

because muh Christianity

i didnt know sending a dick pic to a girl was considered sexual experimentation

>>128053218
looks like its time to invest in Polaroid. never thought I was ever say that.

>>128053854
never thought I was ever going to say that.*

>>128053218

>defending anthony wiener

eat shit ACLU

>>128053636
>>128053482
the fuck are you talking about?

the 'sexual experimentation' theyre talking about is an underaged person sending tittie pics to another underaged person, which is punishable as "spreading child pornography"

>be 18
>have 15 year old gf
>prison for poorly lit tit pictures
hey how about teach your fucking kids to not be retards by the time they're 15.

>>128054878
every single 15 year old is a horny retard, retard

your kids will be to, i promise you

>>128054878
My tax money shouldn't be wasted on that

>>128055293
woah, this a board of peace
if your 15 year old daughter has a 18 year old she's actively fucking, prepare for imminent life disasters

>>128055293
Doesn't mean they need to produce pornography of themselves that will forever be in the possession of the NSA.

>>128056081
yeah here's what gets me about those stories- they end up on registries for the remainders of their lives. it's maddening.

If teens aren't responsible enough to be allowed to sext then they're not responsible enough to be prosecuted, especially with such a harsh punishment.

>>128053482
That's still spreading child porn. Even if you're the one who took the picture.

>>128057184
pff thats nothing. if you ever get caught pissing outside you have to register as a sex offender if they catch you.

>>128053218
Not a pedo but yeah filming yourself consensually isn't a problem. Age of consent is 16 most states.

If a minor is to film themselves and sell it then yeah.

>>128053218
the old men are providing caring,nurturing penis.
a kinder,gentler penis that is not in a hurry and will listen and be supportive.

>>128053218
To be fair kids getting labeled pedophiles for life for taking pictures of themselves is kinda fucked up

>>128054668
And those pics stay just between those two underage people?

ACLU might as well be more vocal against charging minors as adults.

>>128061405
Pedo is pedo. There is nothing wrong with serving justice.
>libshits will try to object this
>muh rights

>>128053636
>because children arent competent to give concent.
Careful, Mick. They'll excommunicate you for that kind of heresy.

>>128053218
Reminder that the ACLU was originally a communist front group and probably still is.

>>128059148
I've never really seen proof of this.

Could set a precedent, who is to counter someone who says they're just peeing when actually exposing themselves?

>>128062613
exposed penis is public exposure. Its real and they do it.

http://www.jonathanrooker.com/pc-314-indecent-exposure

last paragraph.

it's just harmless butt stuff

>>128053218
Kek, anything that causes the (((Gay Si El Jew))) to chimpout is fine with me.

I can't wait until it's legal to bang 15 year olds