>when you realize your so-called fellow nationalists are individualist
>>128039139
Maybe you could explain why well structured individualism is wrong.
>>128040403
You better tell me what you mean by 'well structured' first?
>>128041161
I mean individualist liberal principles that don't lead to degeneracy.
>>128039139
I have no idea what or where pic is from but is the nig ok or did he get his head cracked open?
>>128040403
human being is a socialist animal, denying your very self is the begining of degenerency
>>128041949
It's from an overrated flick.
>>128041793
You're still vague. I'll say this: Why? Why would you have ANY kind of principles that revolve around seeking self-gratification?
>>128041949
Fairly well-known scene from the movie 'American History X'. Watch it on youtube, it's got crunch.
>>128042208
>human being is a socialist animal
Freudian slip there Louis? Did you mean to say social animal? Because being an individual and being sociable aren't incompatible.
If not, fuck outta here you goddamn frog.
>>128041949
No and Yes
movie is 'American History X'
>>128042234
disappinting.
Thx
>>128041949
From the film "American History X". He dies, but it's a fictional movie.
>>128041793
When the masses are given an inch they will take a yard, and they can always be depended on to fall into degeneracy. Its just natural when people are given rights.
>>128042525
>self-gratification
Because it's not about seeking self-gratification, it's about acting as a free-agent in your own rational self interests. You're thinking of hedonism.
>>128039139
They were Jews all along.
>>128042636
>He dies, but it's a fictional movie.
Insert Schindler's List joke here.
>>128039139
Wasn't this movie originally supposed to end with him shaving his head again?
>>128042656
Individualists seek the self as a goal. That is an empty pursuit. There is nothing wrong with acting as a 'free-agent', but you should find loftier goals.
>>128043071
Yes, Gerard Butler was also supposed to win in Law Abiding Citizen but that ending was canned too.
>>128042529
>being an individual and being sociable aren't incompatible
like how ? being individualist wouldn't lead us where we are actually, every scientists discoveries, knowledges or anything relevant human has ever done has been made because of social shares and interactions.
if you're individualist in 2017 it's just because you're a rich boy who want to do nuthin to decrease your situation, not enhance it, just keep what you've got thinkin it's enough.
it's the very begining of degenerency