I don't get it. How can random people just mock their leader

Free speech.

File: australian supermodels.jpg (2MB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2000x1333px

She did nothing wrong. Personally I thought it was hilarious. But I'm also enjoying the schadenfreude of liberals eating their famous line "free speach doesn't mean freedom from consequences"

>>128024518
Then burgers have really big mouths. Watched some CNN and FOX and everybody just goes out of their way to mock. I don't remember euros doing the same.

File: 1419005457478.png (13KB, 676x615px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 676x615px

>>128024876

Smth smth democracy smth smth freedom

Well it's a class E felony to threaten the president, but I don't know anyone who actually did jail time for doing anything, besides the few people who threaten to kill Obama. They got a year in jail and a $3000 fine.

Commies have been among us for sometime now and their infestation is now starting to reveal itself

Real Americans are very goncerned

The First Amendment protects the right to free expression, which includes the right to shoot, burn, or in any way destroy an image of anyone including the president as long you're not posing a "credible threat." The standard here is whether there is genuine intent to commit or incite violence, and also whether that violence is likely to actually occur. If there's no "clear and present danger," there's no basis for censorship.

So people can do things like pretend-decapitate Trump, manufacture shooting targets of Obama's face, burn effigies of Bush, and other such acts.

>>128026009
Is this free speech - muh "You can say whatever you want" - encouraged from a young age in the US schools?

>>128026246
Could be interpreted in different ways..