>riddle me this Why is this considered funny, smart, woke

>>127966774
*these animals

>>127966774

> "normal" people, not connected to (((them)))

I'm going to stop you right there and tell you to rethink your post...I didn't get past that but it's important to get this right the first time, yeah?

>>127966902
look, I know them, they are way too basic to have any connections to the joos.

File: 1494279734614.gif (2MB, 383x576px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 383x576px

>>127966774
It's a good question, and most of them will admit it when confronted with it. Then they continue doing it. I'm not really too sure what it means either.

I've noticed Catholicism is become more socially acceptable as it has become more friendly toward communism. I also know Islam goes hand in hand with communism in a lot of countries, and is seen as a gateway for cultures to accept socialism. I think the answer to your question runs really deep, and it almost seems like a long game effort that has a larger plan than we know at this point.

I've learned over time to avoid people that are hostile towards Christianity though, it's usually an indication that they have serious behavior problems and can't be trusted.

If anything it's proof Christianity is the one true way though.

Another answer might be that muslims will get violent though, you notice south park actually backed the fuck down when they were threatened with death. They still continued to mock other religions though.

Communists were also mocked a lot all the way up until the early 2000s in the USA, almost as much as Trump is in the press now.

So maybe it's just a case of most people being pathetic cowards that can't move away from the crowd.

>>127966774
they've been mocking Christ for as long as I can remember. People slowly conditioned over the years, they probably don't even realize. They just go ah ha ha it's just Micky mouse on the cross.

To liberals the idea of religion itself is something that must be destroyed. They don't realize they're cannibalizing they're own culture the same way zombies don't understand they're eating their neighbors.

Christ is familiar, Mohammad is exotic.


Such cases

>>127966774
Part of reason is, that it used to be edgy to insult christianity and other of those things. And people are culturally stuck in their teen/young adult years.

>>127966774
but that picture is funny

mohammed fucking a goat is funny in an edgy way I suppose. it could be a bit more clever. but if your real question is "why can't I make representations of mohammed at all" there is no good reason. it's pure cuckoldry

>Christians should start blowing up liberals too maybe then....

>>127966774
no, you riddle me this
why do instantly assume whoever created this work of art is mocking christianity?
seems to me like they're just having fun with some dead rats and a crucifix

>>127968782
>why do instantly assume whoever created this work of art is mocking christianity?

:')))

>>127966774
because we're familiar with christianity and disney in the west. it's funny because we're so used to that imagery. insulting foreign people seems kind of mean spirited usually because it is.

If the people you are talking about are former Christians, you might as well call them Jews if they mock Christ.
How do you define being connected to the Jews? What are the minimal conditions to be connected to Jewry? They are probably educated by Jews, consumed Jewish media and learnt Jewish thought. I would say they are conntected to the Jews.