I do not understand if the sources are fake. Then why does Trump want to arrest the leakers that don't even exist?
>>127956674
what are you testing talking points?
>>127956674
IM DONE
I CANT PRETEND ANYMORE
>>127956674
>Then why does Trump want to arrest the leakers that don't even exist?
his tweets are talking about anonymous sources that don't actually exist, not leakers
>>127956674
the british bombing intel was real and the leaker is going to prison
As a stupid Libtard I am always amazed at the wide knowledge base of the Trump base. You people are gods.
leaker says 4 things. 3 are true 1 is scandalous. NYT and WaPo run 4 claims. It is both a leak and fake. E.g.,
Trump shared intelligence about laptop threat to planes. It came from a foreign partner. He shared the specific city the threat came from, which endangered intelligence gathering in the region. some true, some false. All damaging.
>>127956853
So the anonymous sources that aren't leaking anything don't actually exist but the ones that are do?
Got it.
>>127958131
>So the anonymous sources that aren't leaking anything don't actually exist but the ones that are do?
We live in a universe where there can't be both people leaking and people making up anonymous sources?
Got it.
>>127957086
All he had to do was show his birth certificate and that would have ended. I think obama was treated unfairly by fat asses like rush, but that is it.