"Your Question Assumes Facts Based On Anonymous Sources"

>>127767175
if you like that

youll love this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTUD003UyCQ

>>127767175
That (((reporter))) sounds like a turbofaggot.

>>127767175
And then I say "Well, what about the time Trump claimed his anonymous source gave him irrefutable proof that Obama wasn't born in the US.

And then you'll say, "Hah! You said that Trump's claim there is a lie, so the source he got it from must be faulty, so all anonymous sources must be faulty! Checkmate!"

And then I'll say, "So no anonymous source can ever be trusted again?"

And you'll agree.

And the next time an anonymous source says something that benefits your worldview in any way, you'll forget this conversation ever happened.

And then when an anonymous source says something that disagrees with your worldview, you'll start all over again!

>>127767175
Just because you don't agree with it doesn't make it fake news. They're being objective. The simple truth is that facts aren't in Drumpfkins' favor.

>>127767956
Haha. I bet someone gets fired for not cutting his mic.

File: 06L23Uyj.gif (75KB, 633x73px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 633x73px

>>127768493

>>127768326
Oh good, you've managed to craft a justification for what you were going to do anyway. So now we get back to our total domination of every level of government, and your opinion no longer mattering.

>>127768493
>They're being objective
They are not. And the facts absolutely are in Trump's favor, as the Democrats themselves admitted when they said they had no evidence.

File: 90125789123.jpg (22KB, 500x317px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 500x317px

>>127768326

take a chill pill my shill

>>127771291
>barry