Fox News has now shifted from "Trump did not collude wi

File: 1465957380190.jpg (37KB, 387x290px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 387x290px

>>127760800
Remember when Obama told us that the election couldn't be hacked and that one time when Hillary said to not accept the results of an election is an affront to democracy?

Really makes me think man.

>>127760800
That's because by now everyone knows Trump didn't collude with Russia

>>127761051
That was when Trump was being a crybaby and talking about resisting the election result just to cause trouble.

More importantly, that was before we realized just how much influence Russia had on the election.

>>127761386
You mean "that was before my side lost the election, now I get to complain about the very thing Trump was preemptively complaining about, which I was already complaining about in the first place."

>Elections can't be hacked
>Trump wins
>RUDDISHA HAGGED ELECDIONS!

>>127761386
>More importantly, that was before we realized just how much influence Russia had on the election.
Quantify it and describe the scope of the impact.

Additionally, provide proof:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLcMBnz9GWk

>>127761386
Fuck off. Quit moving the goalposts. At the end of the day, both of them complained over the same thing and Obama is a hypocritical douche.

>>127762142
No goalposts moved, son. That's the reality. This is America, our elections don't get fucked with, until we let them.

You fucking let them.

This is why every poll, even Fox polls, ended up being so dramatically wrong.

>>127761051
>Why do you keep complaining about how we won? We won, get over it!!!
Did you really think the public would buy this?

>>127762310
So what do you think? Russia hacked the voting booths?

>>127761386

He said he would respect the results "if I win."

Then he won.

I mean can you guys get any more BTFO than that?

>>127762310
>This is America, our elections don't get fucked with, until we let them.

Articulate what "letting our elections get fucked with" means.

>>127762464
Explain what someone means when they said "Russia hacked the election." I know what it means to normal people with more than half of a brian: someone/some group hacked the DNC emails and revealed just how scumbaggy they all are.

It's the equivalent of a girlfriend finding out that her boyfriend discovered her cheating by looking at her phone messages and getting mad and saying "YOU LOOKED IN MY TEXTS!"

>>127762724
Are you pretending you don't know how America's election got fucked with or are you generally this ignorant of what's going on?

I have yet to see a single shred of credible evidence supporting these outlandish claims.

It's like they're trying to repeat it so much people will start to believe it

>>127762866
Are you going to answer the question? Here, let's assume I was just thawed from a 6 month long cryosleep, I have no idea what happened.

Tell me what happened exactly. You can do it.

>>127762866
How did it get fucked with? Explain. You offer no explanation.

>>127762866
I'd also add that in the post you responded to I explained how the elections got quote "fucked with."

>>127762866
Explain, all I've heard is hearsay and rumors

>>127762724
Just stick to "Russia hacked the election", it's vague enough to be easily denied. Keep avoiding the word "collusion", saying that might hurt your case.

How do you think political infighting and normal, shitty political behavior is at all equivalent to conspiring with a foreign state to gain an upper hand in your election? Can you not see that one is reprehensible, and the other is fucking treason?

>>127763082
Explain to me what someone means when they say "Russia hacked the elections."

It's a simple question your pea sized brain should be able to handle.

>>127763203
>>127763050
>>127763066
>>127762967
>>127762986
Oh I see, a sudden influx of the "proof" meme. What a surprise on /pol/. A place that's seen the proof for months and still uses this tired meme.

Get out of my thread.

>>127760800
Still making these threads autismo? No dossier thread this time? Is everyone a russian shill/kike again?

>>127762866
Provide proof.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLcMBnz9GWk
No, really, provide proof. I have traveled from Rigel-5 and my only experience from this topic is seeing Earth Officials claim to have no evidence. Do you have evidence to the contrary?

American college is worse than I thought?

File: 7ab.png (8KB, 402x424px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 402x424px

>>127763232

File: 1479623454386.jpg (25KB, 346x346px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 346x346px

>>127761051
Because the election cant be hacked, but our mind can

>>127763263
>proof meme

>>127763232
Hello it is me the traveler from Rigel-5. I have seen an image of a bird in front of a tri-color flag say "where are the proofs" before, and I recall such an image upon reading this post.

>>127763232
And nice bait thread.

>>127760800
Man you still pushing russia? Get with the times before you lose harder.

>>127763379
Ah, so letting people know what the Democratic Party is full of corrupt traitors is somehow a treasonous act.

Makes complete sense.

>makes nonsensical claims
>why are you asking for proof
>just trust 100000% certified CNN
Talk about autism

>>127763232
You're weaseling out of a response because it's a flimsy tinfoil-tier conspiracy theory peddled by undemocratic losers

>>127763203
Here's every single thing I've seen about it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_interference_in_the_2016_United_States_elections go to the very bottom to "References" to see the actual articles. Did you think it would be hard for me to cite evidence?

>>127763412
You are so far gone. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, it is true even on Rigel-5. I understand the plague of postmodernism is endemic to your nation but you require some shred of evidence to substantiate yourself or else you write fantasy.

>>127760800
>collusion with Saudi Arabia and Israel isn't collusion
That logic worked for the Democrats. If you want to be ruled by lying sacks of fake shit, you gotta play the game.

File: IMG_0731.png (241KB, 732x633px) Image search: [Google]

241KB, 732x633px

>>127762947
Can I see some Russia collusion evidence please?

Evidence Russia hacked michigans paper ballots please?

Evidence Podesta didn't rape and eat a bunch of kids please?

Evidence of fucking anything please?

>>127763551
>Did you think it would be hard for me to cite evidence?

I don't want you to cite evidence from already proven untrustworthy and traitorous sources, I want you to articulate it to the best of your dwindling ability.

>>127763551
Literally laughing as I read this

Nothing about it is illegal if even true

>>127763551
>oy vey check out these sources
When nothing comes of this witch hunt I will laugh as the democratic party crumbles

I love how ever since trump took office there's been a scandal every week. I guess americans are just fine with their country being a laughing stock by now.

haha do you guys remember that time that orange reality tv show host ran as the republican candidate and WON the election and then didn't manage to do any of the things he promised except for a half finished monument at the US-Mexican border to the stupidity of the republican voters? and do you remember how he was investigated for colluding with a foreign power, and eventually became the 2nd US president to resign? do you remember that he claimed that it was due to "health issues" but everyone knew he had gotten a deal to avoid jailtime?

haha i mean can you imagine xD

>>127760800

Its almost as bad as the 200 left wing propaganda "news" outlets that spew stank garbage on an everyday basis.

shill thread

>>127763521
I know right? It's like they don't even use water filters and listen solely to what RT is saying. What a bunch of low male vitality cucks.

>>127763893
Nice fanfic

>>127762310
Wrong retard, the sampled d+20 to gas light Trump supporters into not coming to the polls

But we came out cause we aren't sad cunts m9

>>127763524
>>127763602
The proof meme is the dead giveaway, I don't fall for it anymore.

>>127763724
>no evidence you could ever provide is good enough for me because I've already made up my mind
Why didn't you say so in the first place, moron?

>>127763755
Guess we'll see, won't we?

>>127763772
Not a fan of witch hunts anymore? I thought you loved a good lynching. Flip-flop back into your ocean of piss, sweetie.

>>127760800
People who push Trump Russia collusion are flat earth tier stupid

>>127764072
Flat earth people have a higher IQ than the average Trump supporter. That's even a proven fact.

>>127764039
I said explain to me what someone means when they say Russia hacked the elections, and three posts later you have yet to do it.

Still won't even do it in your next reply either.

>>127764039
It doesn't work that way

I'm fine with no matter what happens but you're wasting your time, Trump is not resigning and your coup will fail hard

Fox News is considered "too liberal" for its own viewers now. This is a very strange timeline.

>>127764216
>proof meme

>>127763838
Because you snow nigger, the media is ran by the people that lost so everything he does (two scoops) is presented as a scandal

>>127763551
>Did you think it would be hard for me to cite evidence?
Yes - can you find an article that repudiates statements by James Clapper, Director of National Intelligence, claiming that to his knowledge no evidence exists showing collusion between Trump Camp and Russia?
What of the same statement by James Comey, Clapper, Rep. Maxine Waters? I would like to know, it seems a grave matter of national security if so as it means FBI/CIA/DIR are all ineffective in their jobs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLcMBnz9GWk

>>127764402
You're not very incognito. Besides, I didn't even ask for proof, I'm asking for what someone means when they say something.

>>127764480
You're fucking retarded. They gave Obama shit about everything from holding coffee while saluting to his suit color to propping his feet on the desk.

Fucking short-term memory faggot, wake up.

>>127764605
>proof meme

>>127764216
It is absolutely retarded that you're making me quote a wikipedia article:

>In June and July 2016, cybersecurity experts and firms, including CrowdStrike,[77] Fidelis, Mandiant, SecureWorks[78] and ThreatConnect, stated the DNC email leaks were part of a series of cyberattacks on the DNC committed by two Russian intelligence groups, called Fancy Bear and Cozy Bear,[10][79] also known respectively as APT28 and APT29.[77][80] ThreatConnect also noted possible links between the DC Leaks project and Russian intelligence operations because of a similarity with Fancy Bear attack patterns.[81] Symantec and FireEye examined the data themselves and "endorsed Crowdstrike's conclusion that two particular hacking groups were the culprits: 'Fancy Bear' and 'The Dukes'". The latter is also known as APT29.[82]
>In June, 2016, SecureWorks stated that the actor group was operating from Russia on behalf of the Russian government with "moderate" confidence level, defined as "credibly sourced and plausible but not of sufficient quality or corroborated sufficiently to warrant a higher level of confidence".[83] In December 2016, Ars Technica IT editor Sean Gallagher reviewed the publicly available evidence, and wrote that attribution of the DNC hacks to Russian intelligence was based on clues from attack methods and similarity to other cases, as the hacking was tracked in real time since May 2016 by CrowdStrike's monitoring tools.[84]

What do you have to gain by acting this way?

>>127764655
>bait thread

>>127764672
What does this have to do with Donald Trump, out of curiosity?

Additionally, do you know anything about the recent dead famous man from Panama?

>>127764030
>I don't fall for it anymore
Because you fail every time

>>127764672
You're the retard because I'm not asking for proof I'm asking what someone's means when they say Russia hacked the elections?

What does someone mean when they say Russia hacked the election?

What does it mean when they say Russia hacked the election?

What exactly does a person mean when they say Russia hacked the election?

>>127764672
Stop replying to proof meme faggots.

He's going to say ">wikipedia" or some stupid reply that dismisses everything you say and you'll spend an hour linking things to him to similar results.

These faggots KNOW what Trump did, they KNOW what Russia did. The proof meme is a way to dismiss any reasonable debate as fake news.

>>127764484
>"We did not include any evidence in our report -- when I say ‘our’, that's NSA, FBI and CIA with my office, the director of national intelligence, that had anything -- that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. There was no evidence of that included in our report.”

>“I understand that, but does it exist?”

>“Not to my knowledge."

Does that sound like a hard no to you? Or does it sound like someone covering their ass?

>>127760800
Well it's not, and I dont know what you mean by 'shifted'. People tend to talk about multiple things.

>>127764944
finally real proof

>>127764484
>https://twitter.com/MattGertz/status/869608909849464833
don't forget that the same statement was also made by Diane Feinstein (who sits on the senate intelligence committee)

>>127764944
Is it wrong for someone to hack a cheating girls cell phone and show the texts confirming it to the boyfriend?

>>127764200
Do you have a link to source of that proven fact?

>>127764875
Thanks for completely dismissing the proof, it really convinces me that you're a trolling faggot! I don't know about said dead man. As for Trump, guess I'll copy from the article again because you're incapable of clicking a button:

>As of March 2017, the FBI is investigating Russian involvement in the election, including alleged links between Trump's associates and the Russian government.[26] British and the Dutch intelligence have given information to United States intelligence about meetings in European cities between Russian officials, associates of Putin, and associates of then-President-elect Trump. American intelligence agencies also intercepted communications of Russian officials, some of them within the Kremlin, discussing contacts with Trump associates.[116] The New York Times reported that multiple Trump associates, including campaign chairman Paul Manafort and other members of his campaign, had repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence officials during 2016, although officials said that so far, they did not have evidence that Trump's campaign had co-operated with the Russians to influence the election.[207]

Guess what, the final paragraph in that section's intro mentions that Clapper didn't say anything, does that get you nice and hard?

File: 17191405_10212089776110555_7419458667536704370_n.jpg (60KB, 695x500px)

60KB, 695x500px

>>127760800

>>127765275
Yes? It's also illegal.

>>127764912
What exactly does it mean that you're an insufferable faggot?

>>127764922
I don't understand why anyone would act so retarded, though. Are they being paid?

>>127765327
>DNC refuse to allow FBI to inspect servers
>Gives server to 3rd party
>3rd party claims Russia
>Refuses FBI access to servers to confirm
Seems legit

>>127765420
But no mention of the cheating girlfriend? What did she do wrong? Because really the narrative is "You revealed our dirty and treasonous secrets, how dare you."

Funny how you won't even articulate HOW this affected the elections. What exactly did the American people not know before they were hacked, and what did they know after the emails were hacked?

>>127760800
Fucking Shariablue is cucking /pol/ hard, right now.

What do you guys honestly think you are achieving by doing this? Do you think you are actually changing /pol/ and like minded user's beliefs?

>>127765512
Remember whe- oh who am I kidding you're probably still in elementary school. You know how your fourth-grade teacher will tell you to write things in your own words?

Write things in your own words. Use the knowledge (you happen to be void of) you explain it to me without copy and pasting articles I've already read.

>>127765512
There's been a lot of Russian shitposts on this board over the months, posting from random flags.
But I think this thread is probably just a majority of shitheads.

The shitheads swallowed the meme so totally that they have to resist the truth or else face the reality that they got played. You can see /pol/ do this quite often, actually. And even when the facts of a situation are revealed, they claim false flag or some other bullshit and remain in their delusion.

File: Trump neck original.jpg (374KB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

374KB, 2000x1333px

>tfw all I want is a (you)
feelsbadman

Drumpfhie is a big doo doo head

File: 1491708221840.jpg (123KB, 500x542px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 500x542px

>>127765895

File: 06TkAeGQRPMYCig56PajRmFQrNxVDxWSk_0KIHE59Z4.png (253KB, 629x448px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 629x448px

>>127761051
>https://twitter.com/MattGertz/status/869608909849464833
Remember when Obama told Republicans to get over it and win an election if they wanted to be in charge?

>>127765819
So what are the facts in this situation?
Please list them with a link to a source for each one.

>>127764944
Your argument is that the no does not sound enough like a no?
It seems like evidence points towards Russian state actors supplying wikileaks with documents. Ok.
Clapper/Comey/Waters/Feinstein say no evidence of conclusion.

>>127765327
>alleged links
>given information
>did not have enough evidence
>has no knowledge of country's history of ruining elections
You know less of your country than a Spainyard. Die in the street like a dog.

>>127764672
>fbi not allowed to investigate a breach that is being described as an attack on the foundations of our country
MY ALMONDS......WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THEM.........................

>>127761386
>>127762464
>>127762866
>this is ShillForce1 we're gonna do a quick flyby of /pol/, over.

>>127766043
>proof meme persists

>>127765819
Oh fuck le russian hackers are hacking me on /pol/ right as we speak. damnnnnnnn

>>127766240
>Makes claim
>Gets asked to back up claim
>Cries proof meme
Laters shill

File: DBF_CCyVwAAe-kn.jpg (73KB, 1060x526px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 1060x526px

>>127761051

>>127760800

Fox is going to the left before it implodes, anyone who didn't pull all support from that retarded-ass backstabbing shitty network once the younger Murdochs took over is a fucking retard.

Fox hasn't been a conservative network in a few years, folks, and it never will be again. You're going to have to wait for the next new media empire to get your fix.

>>127761386
>$0.89 has been deposited to your Shareblue account, with an added troll bonus of $1.50

>>127766501
>Stages of Clintonism

1. Claim Russia hacked the elections
2. Don't explain what that entails
3. Don't ever comment on the content of DNC hacked emails
4. Don't EVER comment on the content of the DNC hacked emails

>>127766398
>points out facts
>shill pulls proof meme to waste everyone's time and ultimately disregard everything one way or another
>shill declares victory when person refuses to play

Sad.

>>127765645
Cunt I don't think russia had any effect on the election I am just saying that you cannot legally hack into a girls phone. You cannot use a hunch to claim some moral superiority, it's controlling behavior and pretty beta.

>>127763551
I hope you are joking. I sincerely do, because otherwise your brain has been tampered with in ways the CIA could only dream of.

Why don't you start with providing one simple evidence of this collusion you just think you linked to? Please.

>>127763712
>Evidence Podesta didn't rape and eat a bunch of kids please?

That's not how that works. Burden of proof is on you.

As for the rest, the investigation is going and now even FOX NEWS is panicking. Trump hired a criminal lawyer, and THAT GUY immediately got caught up as a member of the investigation.

http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-lawyer-michael-cohen-russia-fbi-senate-investigation-2017-5

This shit is gonna get better and better...Wooooo...

>>127766830
Archived:

https://archive.is/zkA5c <- businessinsider.com article

>>127766728
There is literally nothing wrong with hacking a cheating girl's phone (hacking a corrupt government party's email) and showing the boyfriend (American people.)

I didn't ask if it was legal or not, I know it is.

>>127761386
>>127762310
>>127762866
>>127763232
>>127764030

You do realize that the Russian/Trump conspiracy has nothing to do with voting manipulation, right?

Well you probably don't, based on how you're talking...

You should try actually being informed.

>>127766813
He's just trolling for yous, stop replying to him.

>>127764922
>faggots KNOW what Trump did
I actually don't. I've been in a coma for 18 months. Can someone catch me up on what's going on? This sounds serious.

>>127761051
>Remember when Obama told us that the election couldn't be hacked

And he was right. The actual election results were not hacked.

> Hillary said to not accept the results of an election is an affront to democracy?

No one is saying the election results aren't legit. The issue is that Trump Org/Trump Campaign/Trump Administration has committed Treason.

>>127764357

Actually it's considered to conspiratorial and sleazy. It's weird because usually that's saved for when Democrats are running things, not Republicans running all branches.

>>127760800
Fox News isn't pro Trump

>>127766980
>The actual election results were not hacked.

Then what's all this I'm hearing from CNN saying Russia hacked the elections?

>No one is saying the election results aren't legit.

Then what's this I'm hearing from democrats and their comrades saying the election wasn't legitimate?

>The issue is that Trump Org/Trump Campaign/Trump Administration has committed Treason.

Then what's this I hear about there being literally no evidence of said treason?

>>127767125
Why should they be? He attacks them too in the rare case they're honest.

>>127766887
*illegal

>>127762866
Evidence u fag

>>127766830
>Burden of proof is on you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLcMBnz9GWk
I agree it is silly to make unsubtantiated claims in the absence of sufficient evidence! It would be stupid to suggest there was collusion between Russia and Trump, it is the exact same as suggesting John Podesta rapes and eats children! I could not think of a more apt comparison!

>>127767229
>Fox News
>Honest

Lmao neo-/pol/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b89d1oip7WM

>>127766887
In what fantasy land does that analogy work? You stupid cunt.
There is nothing wrong with leaking government documents, whistleblowing etc but there is plenty wrong with the cheating gf analogy.

File: jail66.jpg (78KB, 720x507px)

78KB, 720x507px

>>127760800
>>127760800
start locking em up for leaving information off their security forms (5 years) and they'll start to sing

LCOK THEM UP!

>>127762866
>ARE YOU KIDDING ME?

>>127766664

Did you miss the election? Literally 3-4 happened all the way until the very end.

#1 isn't a claim, it's a fact supported by not only all the intelligence agencies of the country but foreign angencies as well.

Trump and FOX NEWS are taking it seriously and yet TrumpCucks still think it's nothing. Stupid.

#2 it entails collusion with the Trump Campaign and Russia to help sway the election in Trump's favor using the intelligence apparatus of Russia. Holy shit, are you guys living in a fucking cave?

There have been expanded hearings, a special consul, more Trump personnel being investigated daily, Trump hiring a lawyer and forming a "War Room" to organize a defense...

You have to do some of the work yourself, ignorance isn't an excuse.

>>127767474
>In what fantasy land does that analogy work? You stupid cunt.

It makes complete sense you fuck off retarded Australian fuck. The DNC emails revealed them to be corrupt and a bunch of traitors, now the narrative is that it was wrong to reveal what was in the emails because something something democracy, something something not allowed to know how corrupt your government officials are.

At this point it's a "you ratted on us!" argument, but no Democrat or liberal news agency will actually talk about the CONTENT of the emails.

>there are actual idiots on here who think there was collusion

I really don't understand. It's one of the dumbest conspiracy theories I've yet seen and it seems to be backed only by wishful thinking.

File: Sweden.jpg (309KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

309KB, 1280x853px

>>127767649
>>127762866
>>127762947
daily reminder that all these "sweden" posters are russian shills

Mention rape and 15 Sven's pop up whining about EU refugees

>>127767698
Wow he said cuck he's definitely one of us

>>127767781
>revealed them to be corrupt and a bunch of traitors
except this never happened sweetie

>>127764672
So two hacking groups in Russia MIGHT have been responsible for telling the American public the truth.

Now explain how that is hacking the election.

>>127767807
That sounds like something a Russian would say

>>127760800
Didn't some Harvard law professor say the same thing? That collusion wouldn't be a crime?

>>127766677
>Points out nothing
>Can't provide proof
>Declare proof a meme

I think we're finished here.

>>127766501
oh really name one instance where this occured

>>127760800
This sounds fake

>>127768174
Don't worry he'll explain how he was only pretending to be a redditor in a few minutes when he gets bored

>>127767945
Except it did, and if you ask for proof I'm just gonna go

WOW, YOU WANT PROOF?

>>127767945
The Wikileaks emails were shown to be real by metadata. The American public's decision was influenced by the fact that the DNC was full of corrupt criminals. The claim here is basically that because a leaking group leaked Emails that MAY have been hacked by Russian groups (not confirmed by a real source, decided upon by private firms hired by the DNC) that this is proof that the Russians controlled the elections.

1: There is no evidence of Collusion. Multiple Democrats have already admitted this.
2: There is no evidence of tampering in the election. Everyone has already admitted this.
3: This is a witch hunt to try and bring down public opinion, which is starting to fall apart as the public realizes it.

Your side lost bro. You're not going to be retaking any ground here.

>>127767436
>I could not think of a more apt comparison!

Sure, if you're a ridiculous conspiracy minded fucking moron. Russian Collusion story has an army of lawyers, journalists, politicians and intelligence agencies all over it.

You have a fucking YouTube video. Wew.

>>127760800
>Drumpf is finished says increasingly insane liberal on twitter for thousandth time this week

i don't care if he was born in russia, i don't care if he's on a kremlin payroll, hell it'd probably be good for us, russia takes care of their liberal problem desu

>>127767823

Nobody would ever want to be one of you.

Everybody knows about Dumb Fuck Trump Cucks.

>>127768078
>Now explain how that is hacking the election.

Who said anything about hacking the election?

>>127768601
I am unsure on all browsers but if you click embed by a youtube video link the video plays.

If you click it, you can watch FBI's James Comey, DIR's Clapper, Senate's Maxine Waters, Senate Security Committee's Diane Feinstein say there is no existing evidence of collusion between Trump and Russia.

However this video is old, but I cant find anything revising statements. What seems certain and provable is russia did hacks. What seems a more tenuous claim is Russia colluded with Trump. Your intelligence agencies do not have evidence to support that second claim. Do you?

>>127768335

This thread. All over it.

And the subject of this thread - "Fox News has no shifted..."

Wew. You motherfuckers are d-dumb.

>>127768370

There's is video of it on the link.

File: 1496068263152.png (114KB, 599x491px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 599x491px

>>127761873

>>127768534

If any of what you said was true, the investigation would be over, not expanding. Hmmmm.... you done fucked up.

File: 102571013.jpg (6KB, 250x223px)

6KB, 250x223px

NO EVIDENCE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKrlfqWzE4c

>>127769250

So, the investigation is over, or is it continuing? Because if what you say is true it should be over and in the bag.

It's not. So, you're either wrong or stupid.

>>127769551
Give proofs faggot

>>127769820
Oh, has the investigation found anything?

>>127760800
>Fox News
Who gives a shit?

>>127760800
Not Fox News, one fucking guy they had on the show. Please, some define what they think collusion is. This word gets thrown around constantly, and it's a buzzword. If they knew of a crime being committed, they would specifically name it. Since they have zero evidence of any crime, they throw around this buzzword. Russia story is FAKE NEWS that was dropped first by Robby Mook after Killary got demolished in the 2nd debate.

>>127763412
Provide proof of how it was "hacked" peasant

>>127766980
How have they committed treason? This is something you liberals don't understand too well.

>>127760800
>unironically posts tiny trumps
>EPIC lulz XD XD rekt hahha rekt trumps a baby and a child rekt XD XD XD omg rekt I'm so much more intelligent than trump XD XD rekt
Op I hope you die from an AIDS infested cock puncturing your esophagus

Because Alan Dershowitz literally said it wasn't a crime even if they did collude. Only uninformed Democrat niggers think this is admitting of collusion.

>>127768078
fuck I can't find it
>russia's_diabolical_plan_to_show_the_truth_about_the_democrats.png

>>127764672
Alright, let's break down your "evidence", shall we?

>private ITSec firms claims 2 groups responsible each, only 1 group match eachother
>Cozy Bear, Fancy Bear
>The Dukes, Fancy Bear

So which groups is it? They can't even agree on the second one. Which means they aren't entirely sure, but patterns suggests it's some of these groups. -Suggests-

Now onto the second part, also evaluated by private ITSec firms, to see if this was in coordination with Russian State.

>moderate confidence of this being ordered or coordinated by Russian Intelligence, but not, I repeat, not of sufficient quality to warrent a higher confidence level, described as plausible

Once again, this was based on previous patterns, and not enough evidence to deem it conclusive that it was ordered from the Russian State.

Alright, so we have 3 groups that are potentially the hackers, and it's plausible they were coordinating it with Russian Intelligence. All evaluated by private ITSec firms with no involvement whatsoever by any US intelligence, any steps of the way. Infact FBI was denied access to the servers by DNC.

This is your evidence.

And your evidence of Russia-Trump collusion is even weaker, you listed that there were meetings between campaign staffers and Russian Officials, many of which has been proven to be completely normal and nothing suspicious.

>>127760800
So how long until Trump is kicked out of office?

You know we're in a sad state of affairs when Mike fucking Pence being president would be a breath of fresh air

>>127768601
You called someone else a conspiracy retard and then continued to spout the Trump-Russia collusion one. What is wrong with your brain.

Trump-Russia IS a conspiracy theory you fucking retard. Not even a single shred of evidence to support it. Yet a lot of claims by people involved that there is NO collusion, by the very people involved.

What on earth man, get your shit together, how many layers of drugs are you on?

File: f bay i.jpg (41KB, 460x581px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 460x581px

>>127771849
Rusisians dropping like flies around trump..forgetting he ever even met them

>carter page
>manfort
>stone
>flynn

All these advisers forgot they talked to russia

Russia shilled reletentlessly for trump and against hillary

Whole lot of Russian smoke billowing around trump for a long time ivan... FBIs just going to look for where the fire started

>>127773102
>Russia shilled relentlessly for Trump and against Hillary
>Hillary wanted to go to war over Syria with Russia
>Trump wanted to cool down on the hate towards Russia

Gee I wonder why Russia would do that.

File: mccain.jpg (431KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

431KB, 1024x768px

>>127773752
>Hillary wanted to go to war is russia doesn't get its way
>part of the Russian narrative

Swede's might be okay with Russian's causing a shitshow in your elections. American's are not.

I just want to say that pretending you just woke up from a 2 year coma and need a basic gestalt on the russian hackers meme is a genius idea. It either forces the shill to bring forth any sort of flimsy evidence to bear, for us to shred apart with facts. Or just reveals them as shills or useful idiots (free shills). It has the rare opportunity to red pill them too if they actually go looking for stuff on their own.

We need to find ways to engage the shills in a way to make them stay, but lurk not post. We need them to come to their senses on their own.