How do you rate women, /pol/? I used to use the basic 0-10 system,

For looks (face), 1-8

+1 for personal relation to her
+1 for her figure

>>127668670
>fat
>face
>figure

same first name as my mum so 0/10, cant fap to that

>>127669088
this, from 0-10

Can't divide by zero, retard.

>>127668670

Holy shit this babe is sexy. Gonna look her up.

>>127668670

How do I rate woman? First I think of a man and then I subtract reason and accountability.

File: MV5BMTY3MzI5OTI1N15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwMjA3NjQ2NzE@._V1_.jpg (81KB, 500x564px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 500x564px

>>127668670
All women are disgusting ugly beasts. Little girls are the only attractive females.

>>127668670
Women generally can be rated on three factors:

1. How hot
2. How nice
3. How smart

Almost universally speaking, you can find a maximum of two of those qualities in a woman. I like to rate each quality on a 1-10 scale and generally assume if you can find a bitch that hits 21 when you add her three scores together, you've got a keeper.

>>127668670
Quit LARPing faggot. You wouldn't last 15 seconds if she showed you the time of day.

>>127669764
i also use your scale but i find going by 0-2 is easiest. 0 for not at all, 1 for sort of, and 2 for extremely.

>>127668670
For me, 10's are nonexistent. The 0-10 system is 90% looks. An average-looking girl is a 5, can earn up to 2 bonus points for a nice body/personality. A plain Jane with perky C cups is a comfy 7. Any type of overweight is an instant -2 to -4, she can be the coolest girl alive with huge tits and she's no better than a 3 if she's a size 12.

Personality usually works in favor of average/ugly girls and against hot girls. Lots of physical 9's get dropped a couple points for being whiny, entitled cunts.

>>127669764
Hot, smart, sane

Pick 2

0: No
1: Yes
2: Definitely Yes

>>127668670
As an esteemed babeologist, I use the 3 numbered, comprehensive system I developed in Highschool:

First number is face, second is boobs, third is body. So a completely average chick would be 555. A butterface would be 388 or something. This is the best system

I don't because I'm not retarded.

Good looking women often cheat to look good (they don't look as good naked), and sometimes have awful personalities or lack self confidence. Theres more to women than being blonde and having a nice butt.

File: Cigstache.jpg (50KB, 365x400px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 365x400px

>>127669764
>if you can find a bitch that hits 21 when you add her three scores together, you've got a keeper.

Meet Wanda.
She has the brains of Hawking (10)
the niceness of Mr. Rogers (10)
and, well....
It adds up to 21. Have fun!

>>127668670
Reported.

>>127670984
Generally, you've got a keeper. I actually had a buddy point out this exact problem the other day. Simple fix, minimum of 4/5 on hotness.

File: Schumer.jpg (482KB, 1280x1360px) Image search: [Google]

482KB, 1280x1360px

>>127671963
>minimum of 4/5 on hotness.

In America, about 57 percent of black women, 47 percent of Hispanic women, 38 percent of white women, and 12 percent of Asian women are obese. Rough total is 40% of women are obese. Add another 33% for women who are overweight but not yet obese.

A gal who is 5’ 4”, the average height for U.S. women, is only considered obese at a weight of 174 pounds or more, overweight starts at 145 pounds.

For reference, Natalie Portman is 5’3” and weighs 110 pounds, while Amy Schumer is 5’7” and weighs 160 pounds.