Institutional Racism is a form of environmental stress on the

>>127577748
Bumping rolling for quints

File: IMG_1644.jpg (28KB, 236x236px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 236x236px

>>127577777

>>127577748
In unstable or unpredictable environments, r-selection predominates due to the ability to reproduce quickly. There is little advantage in adaptations that permit successful competition with other organisms, because the environment is likely to change again. Among the traits that are thought to characterize r-selection are high fecundity, small body size, early maturity onset, short generation time, and the ability to disperse offspring widely.

Youre right, they should all go back to a place free of whites.

Please. Go

>>127577748
>>127578097

>implying living on a continent with plentiful food and megafauna for 100,000 years didn't do more to make Africans inherently r-selected than one generation of made-up social concepts

>>127578332
>implying those conditions weren't a necessary constant for all healthy populations at that time regardless of location

>>127578670

They weren't. There's a difference between food amounts barely meeting the carrying capacity of a population, and food amounts so large that they couldn't be plausibly exhausted by a population anything less than astronomically large in size.

The former is the sort you see in northern Eurasia and North America, while the latter is what you see in sub-Saharan Africa. There's a reason why civilizations developed in only one of these.

Society is a racial construct

>>127579421
So are they inherently r-selected ? If so then the idea of white genocide is pretty far fetched.

File: lucyreconstr.jpg (25KB, 202x430px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 202x430px

>>127579627
this
>>127578225
this

>>127577748
>>127579859
HBD faggots: you talk high school biology concepts but can't see the elephant in the room. kys or come back when you are more informed to start a thread

>>127579859

>If so then the idea of white genocide is pretty far fetched.

Not really. We live in a very r-selected society right now; look at all the programs that consist entirely of providing free resources to the populace, and further, the support they garner as if it were perfectly natural (cf. the "right" to welfare, health care, etc.).

The difference is that, while the plains of Africa can plausibly provide resources in a sustainable manner, our intricate system of redistributions, bureaucracies, etc. is not. It all requires immense resources to administer and ultimately either the labor inputs of large numbers of people (who themselves enjoy little of the spoils) or unsustainable debt issuance.

The long-term problem is the viability of this system and the people depending on it who have otherwise developed very few survival skills beyond manipulating the system and scavenging the civilization that supports it.

The short-term problem is that K-strategists are outmatched in an r-selected society. Just look at the reproduction rates of whites in the West; we've built a civilization where any of us could support dozens of children yet our birth rates are dropping. Instead we import savages who have spent thousands of years perfecting the art of quantity over quality and not only do they predictably thrive here we spend our own resources to support them.

There will come a time when the grocery stores run out of food, when the EBT cards stop working. When it happens you'd better hope you can translate those Call of Duty K/D ratios into real-world results because for every one of you there will be a dozen hungry savages who don't know anything except how to consume free resources.