What's the current state of US's nuclear defense and

fucking meme board. so quick to run their mouth about world events but as soon as you ask for specific information it becomes a wasteland.

>>127285098
We're doing the first ever test too shoot down an icbm some time next week, will be interesting to see the results

File: 1495603952739.png (181KB, 500x288px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 500x288px

>>127285098

AEGIS/THAAD destroyers in South China Sea and land based AEGIS in Romania and Poland render Russia/China determent BTFO.


tres dangerous.

File: 1489609092240.png (685KB, 565x800px) Image search: [Google]

685KB, 565x800px

This is why leafs are made fun of.

File: nuke.gif (1MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 320x240px

>>127286397

First ever test? Your tax dollars have already already seen AEGIS and THAAD become proven anti-ballistic missile platforms.

File: an we R woried about Iran.jpg (48KB, 450x316px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 450x316px

>>127285098
In the 80's the US had 35K / USSR had 45K operation warheads. Now the US 5k /USSR 7.5K warheads. The biggest difference is the old missles were pre-programmed not they are programmed at launch to a target packafge.

Do your own research, faget. No one ever helps me on my papers/tests.

File: do-it.jpg (58KB, 317x386px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 317x386px

>>127287139

wait. which wareheads do your AEGIS/THAAD have? kinetic kill? or did someone swap those out for nuclear? uh oh, now we have what everyone in the cold war feared: short-medium range FAST AS FUCK (no need for low earth orbit) nuclear ROCKETS

>>127286796
So does that mean that we could strike at them without retaliation?

>>127287139
How do we know they are telling the truth?

>>127287187
Im just asking for my own curiosity and some discussion on this topic. Do you burgers really need to have an academic incentive to learn new stuff?

File: patriot-missile.jpg (443KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

443KB, 2048x1536px

>>127287589
you obviously have not heard about this baby

U.S. nuclear is itty bitty. Russia's nuclear is tippy top. These were the words of the man holding the nuclear codes himself, Gronald Grumpf. Still think it was a good idea to elect him?

>>127285098
ground based midcourse defense is meh at best

we dont have much chance against ICBMs, although THAAD and SM-3 can take care of smaller missiles

unless obummer and blumpf have sekrit teknology under our noses like operational railguns and lasers

>>127285098
>floppy disk launch codes
not even joking

>>127288500
The silo's hardware are falling apart.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lN41KLI-5Is