How did he manage to get 4 terms? Was he really that great

>>127167796
>Was he really that great of a President?
Short answer, no

There was no such term limit until the jewish communist power-grabbers abused our system of trust again.

>>127167796
kike

File: 1494978482197.jpg (62KB, 626x560px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 626x560px

>>127167796
>How did he manage to get 4 terms?

>>127167796
>>127167882
Long answer: Fuck no

Ameripoos at that time were in depths of The Depression (for all you mal-edjucated snowflakes)

For all the zombification of the citizenry, staying the course was the best bet

he was a pretty great president with classic values; going senile at the end. i don't blame him for not realizing where his internationalism would lead

>>127167796
the GOAT

>>127167796
term limits werent a thing and it was war time so changing the commander in chief would be stupid

>>127167796

Probably the worst president in american history, although LBJ gave him a run for his money. Easily one of the most harmful leftists to have ever existed.

>>127170888
Yes, tripple-8. And it was fantastic that Mr. Rosenfeld's wife wrote up the shizophreinic UN Declaration of Human Rights, where these universal rights only apply to you if you help the UN.

Jews, every time. We don't vote for the "first lady."

the people wanted gibs

Hell no. The recession in the early '20s was worse than the one that he stretched out for a decade with bullshit Keynesianism, but you never hear about it because we bounced back from that one with a hands off approach.
Fuck that guy.

Term limits are retarded. It encroaches on people's democratic rights to vote for whoever they want.

>>127171755
Not true. I found some relics in a local park from his make-work programs.

Can't say much more than that. More recent programs pretty much bulldozed them over for regentrification moneys.

>>127167796
>How did he manage to get 4 terms?

The people loved him. He did the stuff we want our presidents to do now: regulate the banks, protect workers, and give more of our taxes back in the form of social programs like social security. He is the proof that America has always been progressive as fuck.

>Was he really that great of a President?
He was great, but not perfect. He put the Japanese in concentration camps.

WW2 was one hell of a drug!

>>127171557
LBJ was way worse. FDR deliberately put in minimalist welfare. LBJ put everything on steroids and created a true welfare state.

Yes. He was a great president.

Anyone that disagrees is an obvious wehraboo mad that the nazis lost

File: 1331146904_president-lyndon-b.-johnson-signing-the-immigration-and-nationality-act-of-1965.png (481KB, 956x678px) Image search: [Google]

481KB, 956x678px

>>127172088
and let us not forget this

>>127167796
There was no actual term limit at the time and he used public sentiment toward the war effort to his advantage (i.e. shouldn't change things up in the middle of the biggest war in history especially when it's going well)

File: 1443636210724.jpg (81KB, 678x1000px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 678x1000px

>>127172088
LBJ couldn't have done what he did had FDR not done what he had.

There was always going to be an LBJ at SOME point after that. He was just the first that figured out you could explode welfare for free wins in a democracy.

Isn't this the guy that stole everyone's gold? How would that make it a great president when the essence of the Constitution is to protect people from the government?

File: not an argument.png (580KB, 691x603px) Image search: [Google]

580KB, 691x603px

>>127171918
>"Not true"
>Says nothing to refute the claims made
Fucking wew.

Disgusting man who was more focused on using the war to subjugate Europe than tackling Bolshevism, which many of his aids were enthusiastic about.