Snopes is incredibly Left Wing
Context
>base Montana man body slams cuck journalist
>breaks his nu-male glasses
>cries to twat-ter
>phony outrage by libshit twitter cucks.
>snopes editor comes in
>supposedly a fact website
>uses her twitter and followers in an thinly veiled attempt to influence court of public opinion
>supposedly a (((fact check website))) acting like a (((journalist))) to insert her (((bias)))
>>126987104
Look at unhappy she looks with her life.
>>126987104
Political positions are facts.
War is peace.
Freedom is slavery.
>>126987104
Oh, did widdle OP get ums a widdle twiggered by some fact checking. Don't get your widdle swatika armband in a widdle wad.
>>126987104
The truth is incredibly left wing.
>>126987578
Is that a leftist midget?
>>126987104
>Facts go against my narrative
>It must be left wing
Drumpfkins everybody
If Snopes is literally just 2 Liberals with access to Google, where is the right wing Snopes???
>>126988707
>implying fact checking websites are neutral
Shitting on terrible Snopes aside, is he even denying it? Hell if the election wasn't tomorrow (right?) I'd be putting it in TV ads. Especially in fucking Montana.
>>126988707
it's how the facts are presented. They're trying to imply body slamming guardian journalists is a strange or bad thing.
>>126987578
That's what happens when you worship money and your 'truth' is paid for by people destroying the world.
>>126988815
This is the right-wing snopes
>>126987104
>true: in an alternate universe it could have conceivably happen
jesus christ I took one look at this user's twitter and all it consists of is inane leftist screeching
>>126987104
unaltered audio of the incident:
https://youtu.be/4-Ja4tjr-HE