The news doesn't lie to us. That would be unethical and

>>126969309
yes

>>126969309
A while back, WaPo ran a ridiculous story that the Russians had hacked the Vermont power grid. It was briefly picked up and given major coverage by MSM.

It was quickly proven to be false. Last time I checked, WaPo still had the article on their website with a tiny editor's note saying that the story was less than true. Google 'WaPo Russian Vermont Power Grid' or something similar to find it.

Sally my dick is 14 inches it's true because you can't prove me wrong

>>126969309
Better question, since they're the ones making the statements:

Can they provide times they've been PROVEN accurate (past anonymous unverifiable sources)?

or, you know, that whole MUH RUSSIA thing that they still don't have a single piece of evidence on

>>126969309
>be MSM
>talk about "Russian Spy" - an operative known to intelligence agencies - for months
>turns out it is actually the Russian Ambassador to the US performing his daily duties

Yep, they don't lie. They just intentionally mislead for political gain.

>>126969309
How about when he first announced his candidacy and the knee jerk articles all accused him of saying that "All Mexicans are Rapists" despite that being a wildly inaccurate misrepresentation of his speech?

File: 1469747614493.png (798KB, 996x868px) Image search: [Google]

798KB, 996x868px

>>126971373
>>126971463

>>126969309
They said he didn't pay taxes for 18 years, when he actually could have carried losses to offset against income for up to 18 years. They also said he asked Russia to hack Hillary's e-mails. He did not. IT was talked about for MONTHS how Hillary had "lost" 33,000 e-mails. And it was widely speculated that Russians had stolen them. So, he made a joke - if you want to know what is in the e-mails, ask the Russians. Quite obviously IMPLYING that the "lost" e-mails were stolen and in possession of the Russians. It is too easy to point out the lies, I could sit here and do it all night.