>This is from my university's Psychology course it never

Fourth option >

○ the Satanic child-eating cult that is the DNC will murder anyone in her path

Answer was the second one, if anyone was curious

>>126850837
Well that seems right at least.

I mean both genes and environment play a role.

>>126850245
I guess this is what you can expect when you go to a community college or a shit tier noname 4 year school.

>>126850920
Yes. It is disgusting that they used her as an example though, and pretty fucking blatant propaganda. They never would have used Ivanka's child.

>>126850837
I would have responded 3

>>126850245
are they suggesting thay some genese are better than others?

>>126851623
Yes. Would be redpilled, but they make a point about how race is not a factor.

>>126850245
The kid has 0% Clinton genes.

File: Screen Shot 2017-05-23 at 11.47.43 PM.png (48KB, 963x293px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 963x293px

Also
>John Locke was an idiot goy! Forget the Constitution!

>>126851897

It's technically not a factor in individual cases. If you have smart parents you will probably be smart.

It is a factor in the aggregate, but they probably aren't allowed to mention that.