Are there any negatives from banning religion? I don't

Banning it won't stop people from thinking and believe in stupid shit.

File: jordan-smaller-1024x683[1].jpg (102KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 1024x683px

>Are there any negatives from banning religion?

The entire human race falling into suicidal nihilism or homicidal totalitarianism.

Also, clean your room.

>>126730861
the problem is there will always be a new religion, it's impossible to stop because "religious values" are universal, just different sets are used. the point is that religion is the distillation of human morality. and that's why religions need to be updated not banned

We should ban Islam in Europe.
Europe is a place for Christianity, There is no place for no Islam.
This is white people territory.

>>126730861
anon, do you think we should get rid of both religion and traditions?

people will just replace religion with something else even worse. like how they're doing with social sciences and their altruism in the west. everybody would be trying to prove how tolerant they are to the point they destroy everything around them. people want a sense of moral superiority over others even if it's all based on lies whether it's 74 genders and oppression olympics or piety to god

>>126730861
Albania banned all religion, now look where they are. Religicucks have to be able to practice their religions in order for society to function.

>>126731335
Traditions aren't harmful, well accidents happen, but it does relieve society, and possibly reduces crimes, or something.

>>126731128
Nihilism is positive though?
As long as you understand that you only live once, you can make the best out of your life... Though, most people might start to work part time instead of full time, but they can't because nobody will hire a part timer.

>>126731647
A shithole doing something, to then remain a shithole, doesn't really tell you much.

>>126731744
don't most traditions intertwine very heavily with religion?
another question, do you think people will have unity in sense of nationalism or such without these?

>>126730861
You will need to fill that void in society and the lives of stupid people, otherwise they'll come across something equally stupid like SJW culture. Religious people feel comfort in being led by others its unlikely they'd turn to science as an alternative.

>>126732071
What? No?

Majority are athesits, and we're doing fine.
There's a minority that are religious, who terrorizes the rest of the population. That minority should be removed, what they're doing is most of the time illegal.

Traditions have nothing to do with religion. It's possible some traditions were created by religion, but there's absolutely no connection to religion anymore, it's just days when you don't work/get better pay.

>>126732381
It's like 5% of the population... Or, well, maybe 10% now with all the mudslims.
Banning religion would not affect the vast majority of population, at all. The only thing they'd notice is a society that was more prosperous, with less hate and crime.

The religious people who remain religious can just be sent to mental hospitals, where they belong. It'll cost society some money, but it's probably less than it costs society right now to let them run free.

>if you ban religion then bad things wont happen
Mental capacity of a 9 year old

>>126730861
>Are there any negatives from banning religion?

yes, if your rights are god given they cannot be taken away

if your rights are not god given they can be taken away

>>126732912
In the civilized world, it's illegal for a political party to use religion as a motivator.

>>126732723
Crime is still going to exist, but a lot of it will lessen.

>>126733415
'we have long past taken care to discredit the gentile priesthood, and thereby to ruin their mission on earth which in these days might still be a great hindrance to us. day by day its influence on the peoples of the world is falling lower. freedom of conscience has been declared everywhere, so that now only years divide us from the moment of the complete wreckings of the that christian religion: as to other religions we shall have still les difficulty in dealing with them, but it would be premature to speak of this now. we shall act clericalism and clericals into such narrow frames as to make their influence move into retrogressive proportions to its former progress.'

i do indeed think most religion has grown dumb.

>>126731744

> As long as you understand that you only live once, you can make the best out of your life.

Yet you are here posting on a mongolian cave painting forum giving. And what is the best out of your life? Is there a objective standard that gives you a % of how good a life you live?

>>126732439
>Traditions have nothing to do with religion.

Looks at both of our flags. Uhm... No matter if you like it or not, Christianity has left a mark on us. Now most here in Norway are classified as atheists due that they do not care about religion, not that they reject religion on a concious level. To them, it doesnt register on the day to day schedule, it doesnt mean that they are hostile to it.

>>126732667
>The religious people who remain religious can just be sent to mental hospitals, where they belong.
own.

If you try to put me into a mental asylum because I believe that we cannot be products of mere random chance of molecular mishmashing and that a Creator is involved. Then we are going to have a huge fucking problem.

It's apparent that you mean Islam, but you're socially engineered to equate every religion as equal.

Poor brainwashed brother. We will free you soon from the clutches of cultural marxism.

you can never get rid of religion, people need it as a crutch because they are mentally weak and fucked up

>>126734326
By not banning christianity as well, one could argue that islam should just be given time, that they will comply better in a decade or two.

And yes, you do belong in a mental asylum if you've actually gone to school (did you skip it all?), and still don't believe in evolution.

>>126731261
That racisssst