>God Emperor Trump will make America great again /pol/ said

literally lmaoing @ at all stupid drumftards right now

they voted for some stupid meme spouting racist without realizing the real power will be given to a bunch of fossils who rather not have the world progress

>>118926617
Good.
Dumb ameritards.

>>118926619
Am one of the aforementioned Ameritards. What country do you recommend I flee to?

>Oh no they're doing what they've been doing even thought there's a regulation against them doing it

>>118926620
Mexico

>>118926622
Kek

>>118926617

listening to the cowards that are POL. jesus man.

i mean ok i want a whiter america, and less mudslimes.

but Trump is a fucking joke, and a puppet for the elite and the russians.

Every human with the right mind will not vote for that autistic orange blowfish... But burgerclap vote him...

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA!!!!!!

File: 6b36fdf3ae8687b043bb6d2e7fa390a359437df5083a263877ab8c4d8feb98c6.png (342KB, 618x685px) Image search: [Google]

342KB, 618x685px

trumpcucks have been in full cognitive dissonance even after constantly being fucked in the ass by cheeto benita

>>118926624
reminder that ignorant russophobic bigotry is not acceptable. it's 2017, not 1967.

Trump has nothing to do with this, other than that he is a republican president. People really need to stop complaining about trump specifically when their actual complaints are with a republican presidency generally.

>>118926617
bet same sort of people are whining about sharing "your" facebook and instagram photos online without your consent :^)

>>118926617
>this brainless hysteria again
the repealed regulations never even took effect in the first place
stop sucking on corporate-owned media cock

>>118926617
>/pol/ b& my country because they can't handle the banter

>>118926617
He is.


Nothing to hide? Nothing to fear.

>>118926630
>tell another anon stop sucking corporate dick.

While sucking trump orange and ISP cock.

KYS trumptard

File: 1486141677860.jpg (799KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

799KB, 1080x1080px

>>118926632
>Nothing to hide? Nothing to fear.

This meme again

File: Replyingtoshitposters.jpg (206KB, 494x842px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 494x842px

@59652140

File: Looted_Golden_Throne_by_Jaekyu.jpg (163KB, 853x797px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 853x797px

>>118926617
The LULZ always win.

>>118926617
This has nothing to do with gentoo
>>>/pol/

>>118926638
the internet is technology

>>118926617
What does this have to do with Trump? It was voted for by Republican senators. Trump had nothing to do with it, and can even veto the decision (not that he's going to). This hysterical viewpoint that everything the Republicans do is Trump's fault is asinine, and lets people like Paul Ryan, who's at least as slimy if not more so, completely off the hook.

>>118926639
No it isn't. You can have an internet without technology, with all the spyware intact. This topic is not technological.

>>118926617
At this point, why does it even bothers you so fucking much?

All your intel agencies have it, there's a ~95% chance all your data is "mined" by a tech giant.
Considering the fact that sooner or later tech giants won't make shit money from ads, i'm not even surprised.


Even then, if you would have wanted 100% privacy you would know that browsing the internet from home(or anyother place that requires your identification) is the most retarded shit ever, and it's not like these things are known since yesterday, they're known from at least the 90s.

I'd rather think that your problem isn't with the privacy itself, but the legal roundabouts of what you're browsing.

If it bothers you so fucking much move to another country, even the communist shithole that is the EU has better privacy laws than US for 10+ years.

File: 1479863647914.jpg (173KB, 513x703px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 513x703px

>posted from my android device

the hypocrisy is real

This isn't even that big of a deal. No different from how Facebook, Google, and pornhub track your browsing habits.

Think about this as if it wasn't technology. Imagine if you walked into Starbucks every day to order coffee. Starbucks decides to remember what drinks you buy every day so they more easily market to you with specials, coupons, etc. And keep you as a customer, or sell your drinking habits to the Starbucks franchise in the next town because they've seen you purchase drinks from there a few times

Now imagine that this was illegal because you have a right to privacy in Starbucks when drinking Starbucks drinks, and that privacy includes your habits of drinking Starbucks drinks

File: 084.png (74KB, 300x256px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 300x256px

>>118926626
>be a marxist
>be anti-semtic

>electing a literal meme

You sure showed those evil SJW's who conspire to commit white genocide.

At least America will stay 60% white for a few years more. Hail drumpf. Parise kek.

>all this shilling and young-boy pandering

lads tell me again how this is worse than killing sandniggers with flying robots

File: 1485856325579.jpg (74KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 640x640px

>>118926644
>can choose not to use Facebook
>have almost zero choice of ISP in America
>no different
are you retarded

Protip: they already were ;^)

>>118926617
>/pol/ said
You mean the normalfag influx from /r/the_donald which is owned my literal jew

>>118926617
>normies are now subsidizing my internet

Why is everyone getting so bent out of shape over this again?

Democrats fully endorsed the bill as well in comments. They only voted no because they're currently voting no on every single bill that comes their way in a sad attempt at obstructing government.

>>118926651
Pretty much this, /pol/ is now unusable because of the /r/the_donald trumpazee flood

god speed to the /pol/sters breaking these fuckers down.

File: kekkest of keks.jpg (105KB, 650x350px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 650x350px

>>118926617
>Trusting /pol/
The world is laughing at you and your incompetent orang-utang

Has nothing to do with Trump .. the rule hadn't gone into effect anyway .. no Constitutional authority for that. It should be left to the free market to handle.

File: Shame ATT.png (75KB, 665x671px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 665x671px

>representing the people

If you think about it logically, how much data can they really get, anyways. 99% of the data sent between you and a server is encrypted these days. Even if it wasn't encrypted, it'd still be illegal for the ISP to snoop on said transfers. About the only data they have legal access to is whatever info they have on you that you gave them when you signed up, and a log of what IP addresses you are communicating with.

So, I guess they'll know that a random 30 year old man, or possibly someone in his family, or possibly a friend, is watching netflix. Wow. Advertising companies are going to be dying for that kind of intel!

At least Google uses its massive botnet to keep tabs on everything their cattle does, from search terms to the links they click on affiliated websites, and link it all back to specific individuals social media accounts. Way more valuable.

>It's legislatives fault so I blame the executive too

>>118926658
>>118926660
>>118926661

So what percentage of those listed voted for the bill vs. against?

>>118926658
What, don't 10% of all Americans own AT&T shares?

>>118926620
Venezuela. Your rare pepes collection will finally be useful.

>>118926621
People murder other people despite there being a clear law against it. Yet, I don't see people railing against the current law.

Why is this "they'll do it anyways" argument always brought up when it comes to regulations?

>>118926658
>>118926660
>>118926661
Most senators are multimillionaires. If you have millions of dollars, you probably have it invested in diversified stocks. You should probably break it down by how many shares they hold, to see if they're actively investing in said company or just doing normal trading.

>>118926662
>implying Trump couldn't veto this
>implying Trump won't actually sign this

>>118926617
Recommend good VPN cheap privacy-respecting services please

Alternatively is it possible to set up one on EC2?

They were already selling your personal info. Now they can just do it openly instead of using puppet companies in other countries.

>>118926645
fucking /pol/tards unironically think that anyone who doesn't like their retarded populist liar is a Marxist

>>118926663
Republicans voted for, dems against. It was strictly down the party line because congress can't march out of step with their puppet masters.

File: pepe-cf-coo-pepes-epic-high-five-2726898.png (97KB, 500x466px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 500x466px

>>118926617
It's a grand meme far beyond your means of comprehensions. We're meming the whole world into eternal fire. What have you accomplished? I memed this and I'm not even 20 yet.

>>118926670
Seems to me they can give it to anyone including the government, political parties, and even local police.
AIPAC could target anyone that's visited a BDS site.

It's dangerous to free speech. The internet is communications and should have the same protections as a phone.

>>118926617
This is more of that "Thanks Obama" shit meme, only this time it is "Thanks Trump". I like Trump, but the dude isn't perfect. And this isn't his doing, but he sure as shit enabled it. Dick move.

>>118926675
And he's sure as shit going to sign off on it.

>>118926670

They were already selling your info because it was legal. This vote was to overturn an FCC regulation that was about to make it illegal. The FCC would have eventually overturned it anyway thanks to Pajeet Ayy's sterling leadership, but this kept it from going into effect at all.

>>118926617
Reminder that libtards where justifying obama for NSA and CIA niggers just like trumptards are doing it now

File: 1487709204612.png (7KB, 535x480px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 535x480px

>>118926617
>tfw stupid burgers are actually retarded enough to vote for an sticked to 18th century attitudes idiot just because of memes
Lmao
>>118926620
Come to Russia. Papa Putin svoich ne brosayet (do not give up our famalam).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qznPnKG9zko

>>118926620
>>118926622
Mexico no joke even on a McDonald's salary you will live like a king there and the crime rate is about the same as America's the difference is that in America a cop will shoot you and you just have to accept it because if you shoot at him you have the death penalty. In Mexico it's just a drug cartel member and you'll probably get a tax break for each you shoot

File: 1467866108012.gif (580KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

580KB, 480x360px

>>118926658
>>118926660
>>118926661


why are politicians allowed to have special interests like this?

>>59654734
inb4 a law is passed so that all political figures and some rich people can't be monitored through their internet history

>>118926654
Democrats were the ones that put it in place in the first place weren't they?

>>118926684
Didn't britbongs pass a law like this?
Why do anglos hate privacy?

>>118926617
If you're not a criminal, you have nothing to worry about.

>>118926617
Any european country
Here in Italy i torrent from public tracker, and never get warnings from isp
Also we have solid privacy regulation
And fucking pizza

>>118926655
>god speed to the /pol/sters breaking these fuckers down.
Need some sauce on this. I want to believe, anon.

>>118926655
What is /pol/ doing to keep redditors out?

File: l04he.jpg (27KB, 399x385px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 399x385px

> All these libtard commie SJW tears

Praise KEK! Truly the greatest timeline ever.

>>118926691
Are you attemping to make this post of yours an epic meme?

/pol/ made the mistake of trusting any politician

i miss libertarian /pol/, now it's full of alt-right redditors

>>118926693
/pol/ was always half nazi and half libertarian.

The amusing thing is /pol/'s projecting about cuck porn is probably going to end up getting them spammed with cuck porn.

>>118926694
the nazi half was mostly ironic edgelords and then there was stormfront

>>118926679
Am I being detained?

File: 1362960884713.png (28KB, 499x322px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 499x322px

>>118926674
>The internet is communications and should have the same protections as a phone.

They do. Your phone company knows exactly who you're calling and when and how long, but they don't know the contents of the call. Your ISP knows exactly what IP you're connecting to and when and how much data was transferred, but they don't know the contents of the communication.

I mean, do you even think about what you're posting, or are you just going with reactionary outrage based on a narrative that's been force fed to you?

/pol/ only memed Trump to presidency because it made leftists mad. No one cared if he did good or bad.

wut

>>118926617
>/pol/ said
Sup bitch heard you were talking shit like I wouldn't find out

>?

RARE FLAGS

aliens have landed
or the mods moved the thread

>cant blame trump for republucans
>blames everything on obama

>>118926617
>>118926618
Yeah fuck isps google and facebook are the only ones allowed to sell your data

Wtf I love cronyism now

>Illegal Alien flags thread

SENT THEM BACK GUYS, GET THOSE GUNS

>>118926649
So your problem is with governemt sponsors monopolies

>>118927536
People opt-in to those services though. The internet makes up a large part of the economy, unless you're somehow completely self-reliant you don't really have much of a choice.

Kind of stupid. It's already legal for them to sell your data, all the law did was abort a regulation that was going to go into effect next year.

Besides, it's redundant and incomplete compared to what Google is selling, and what little they have on you that Google doesn't is pretty much irrelevant for marketers.

Just use a VPN if you care. You should be using one already, anyways.

>>118927958
So what you don't like are government enforced monopolies

I agree

>>118927536
You don't pay for Google and Facebook and you can still use the interwebs leaving minimum footprint this is straight up theft

>>118926617
They didn't already do this?

>>118927958
You can opt out of ISP data collection even after this as per FCC regulations.

>>118926621

this

>>118928492
You shouldn't have to. If you applied this to real life you're basically paying a letter carrier to deliver your mail, they shouldn't be opening your mail and scanning the contents and then selling it for profit.

So what is the actual vote count? Show me proof that democrats unanimously denied the bill.

>>118928453
>They didn't already do this?

Only for the last 20 years
Obama basically just gave Google a monopoly
wonder why Google is so liberal?

>>118928393
How is this theaft? You'll sign it away in any user agreement don't kid yourself

>>118928453
They do google hates competition

>>118926617
>This guy really likes /pol/ YouTube videos on how to get better at dota and chubby Asian porn.
>Lemme see those chubby Asian Web address, for research.

I'll be fine.

the only thing this changed was removing Google's monopoly over that data

>>118928825
People opt-in to google they do not really opt-in to internet usage. Also google is free*** and supported by advertising, ISPs are supported by the subscriber's monthly payment to them.

>>118928453

This vote was to override an FCC regulation that was about to go into effect making it illegal.

>>118928800
They're not scanning the contents. It's illegal to inspect the content of a packet. Most packets are encrypted even if they tried.

All they know is what IP address you're connecting to. Your phone carrier knows who you're calling and your mail carrier keeps records of who shipped items to who.

>>118929077
That's slightly better at least but still not great. ISPs still shouldn't be allowed to sell that data, they're providing a service for a price already they shouldn't get to double dip.

>>118926617
>Implying that Illary wouldn't have done the same shit.

>>118929830
Wasn't it put in place by democrats to begin with?

File: Face of pol.jpg (105KB, 740x493px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 740x493px

>>118926628
>>118926630
>>118926632
>>118926637
>>118926654
>>118926670
>>118926685
All you NEETS are about to become perma-NEETs when your future potential employer looks up your internet history and sees how massive of faggots you all are.

This bill is awesome. I can screen for anonymous Nazis from my company by forking out a couple of bucks to comcast.

>>118929697
Look, I don't particularly care for the idea either, but the reality of the matter is that they're collecting that data no matter what, and it has a monetary value, so it's going to get sold one way or another whether there's FCC regulations or not. Realism takes precedence over idealism, and realism dictates that you should use a VPN if you're overly concerned.

>>118930292
>t. cuck
Yes goy, lets sell our rights away one bill at a time.

>>118929004
So you don't like government monopolies

That's the problem

>>118930726
I don't like monopolies in general. Government regulated monopolies are preferable to one without regulation.

>>118930478
You never had the "right" in the first place. The regulation preventing the sale of this information never went into effect, and it never will now that it's been repealed.

>commercial use
It's even worse, because this is enabling them to enhance their filth for money
If it was the government, they 'd have even more shit to look through than they already have, and it won't stop people from literally throwing false flags everywhere, making it EVEN HARDER to find potential threats, as a large number of people are ironically searching for "how 2 mk big bumb" on google or third party sites like, surprise surprise, this fucking place
Buy 12-pack value diapers and get a 4 month 4chan pass for free