Perhaps the most painful red pill to swallow

FUCK your beliefs, Finnigger!!!

Fuck fuck fuck
nigger faggot butt
fuckk fuck fuck cuck
88 88 88 88 88

>>114962818
It's not just my belief. It's the truth and the sole reason why MGTOW exists.

Most men are delusional, however. And that is because of our mothers that loved/love us UNCONDITIONALLY.

So, children can't love their parents unconditionally?

>>114963416
>>114962339
MGTOW is race treason, and you are race traitors. It is not possible to be MGTOW and a Nationalist, and it is therefore not possible to be a MGTOW and a good person.

>>114963873
They can, but don't always do

>>114963873
Children honor their parents because they need them, hence attach to them.

But by the time they're adults, this attachment is not as strong as it was before, proving that it is not unconditional love, but conditional "love".

Women and men would die for their children, no doubt. Man would die for his wife in most cases. But would a woman die for her husbands? Hell no.

Losing your child is much more painful than losing your parent.

Losing a sexual partner is much more painful for men than for women, proven by the fact that men kill themselves much more often after divorce than women.

In this hierarchical sense, women are intermediate between men and children.

>>114964964
Please seek professional help

If I wish I could be blue pilled again desu. I miss that blissful ignorance.

Some things are better left untold. The nature is cruel, and the way it tricks us is cruel, in this case the love we receive from our mothers that we will not receive from any other woman, even though the nature led us to believe so.

>>114962339
This picture is so incredibly wrong in almost every way

>>114962339
No such thing as honor

I know /r9k/ doesn't want to hear this, but real, true romantic love does exist. Just not everyone finds it.

>>114965864
My mother passed again on January 8. Cancer. Really bad, 4 years fighting, but it was too strong. I'm 19 now. Studying shit I don't really like. Despite, my GF is a pretty darn good girl. I'm her first ever everything, from kiss to sex. With a strong father he is also rather traditional.
The problem: we live a bit far away now. So much so that things will start to decay.
Swallowing this pill is too much, but Finland is right. Knowing I won't be loved like that ever again hurts too much. The more I know women, however, the stronger it gets.
Sometimes I wish I stayed bluepilled. The more if I ake in to a count I was an only child and many times my mother said having me was the best and happiest moment in her life. I was everything to her. But now it's gone.

This may not be my blog, but bear in mind that pill. Let my experience teach you. You will regret not spending more time with her afterwards. Believe me. I'm tearing up while writing this. Stay safe bros.

>>114966335
Elaborate

>>114966455
By honor I mean the attachment that is derived from the capability of women when compared to children, and from the capability of men when compared to women.

Men don't need women to survive. Women don't need children to survive. Children need women and men to survive, women need men to survive. Loves makes this survival possible, and since men are at the high end, they wont receive unconditional love by anyone other than their mother because they don't need it.

I don't know how to put it more simple, so I hope you understand.

>>114964964
>But by the time they're adults, this attachment is not as strong as it was before, proving that it is not unconditional love, but conditional "love".
Were you raped as a child? Do you not love your parents you sick fuck?

File: jesus christ is light.jpg (61KB, 480x600px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 480x600px

>>114966867
God bless you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=s66DchGhhD0

>>114966601
Where have the Jews hidden it?

I think you're right.

This is something i've been wondering about myself.
But of course, it's only a generality.

SOME women can love their husband unconditionally, it's just unlikely to happen.

>>114962339
There is no honor since everything got a pricetag printed on it.That took the biggest toll.

>>114967426
It's true.

When you're an adult, losing your parent isn't as painful as it would've been as a child.

Respect your mother, and take care of her when she's old. She is, after all, the only woman that will ever unconditionally love you.

>>114962339
your kids can love you

>>114965631
What a stunning counterargument! You have changed my mind about not only this matter but my prejudices regarding Polish intelligence.

>>114968227
Pssh assuming parents love all their children especially unconditionally it's like you don't realise pol has fucked up families

>>114966601
>oxytocin addict

Yeah bro.

>>114968227
>>When you're an adult, losing your parent isn't as painful as it would've been as a child.
You never lost a child so you're just talking out of your ass. Even if I grant you this proposition, that doesn't mean you don't love your parents. There's something seriously wrong with you lad.

>>114962339
Screenshotting this now i have ammo for when people ask me why i dont gave a gf.

>>114968383
But the love is so different, which is why I call it attachment or "conditional love".

Love in its purest form is the love man gives to his wife and the love man/woman gives to his/her child. Honor in its purest form is the honor woman/child gives to husband/father.

File: image.jpg (161KB, 995x899px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 995x899px

>>114962339
Tl;dr gay love is best love

>>114962339
There's a female youtuber who's a 10/10 and is also rich from her youtube channel which has millions of subscribers yet she dates a fat ugly low-status guy and she's been with him for years - how do you explain her?

>>114968887
>you sure that's the real reason?

women and children don't honor shit

the concept of honor doesn't exist for them

>>114966601
It does not exist, It never have and never will.

>>114969021
So that would mean when kids grow up, get jobs, move out, etc and are no longer reliant on their parents that they intern stop loving their parents
You sound like a terrible, ungrateful little shit of a kid

>>114969393
The only thing one case can do is disprove a universal quantifier. OP never said "every single woman behaves in X manner". He was talking about the average behavior.

>>114969393
Anecdotes wont change the general rule, and the general rule is top men get most of the women (Pareto principle).

This proves that the love women feel towards men is conditional, hence not direct, unconditional or as pure as the love men feel towards women and children.

>>114962339
No-one should be loved unconditionally.

So when I fuck a girl I'm dating really good and she is insane/crazy about me, this is just her honoring me and not loving me? I usually find that girls get far more attached to me than the other way around.

>>114970043
Ofcourse. I'm just curious as to what OP believes her motive would be.

>>114969951
Again, the love is DIFFERENT.

In other words, it's not as pure as the love your parents feel towards you.

You will know this when you have children, or when you fall in love for the first time. You love your children more than you ever loved your parents, because it's in a different, purer form.

Don't get me wrong, ok.

>>114962339
The lack of correlation in this post makes me irrationally angry.

Paedophila and blah blah blah, wtf are you talking about?

>>114964122
show down, cowboy. MGTOW isn't "race treaon," it's basement-dwelling bedwetters

obviously women aren't required to love unconditionally. would you fuck an ugly whale for life, just because she loved you?

>>114962339
you need to get laid

>>114969951
Also, to demonstrate the difference of the intensity and pureness of love towards your parents and your children, I'll ask you this:

Would you die for your parents? You most likely wouldn't.

Would you die for your children? You most likely would.

You seem to make a lot of sense OP, but can you explain this? >>114970328
It seems to happen a lot. Is this not "true love" but rather attachment because of the pleasure (but couldn't this also count as love? maybe not because it's selfish?)

>>114966867
>he is also rather traditional
What is it with you Spaniards constantly fucking up he and she? Not judging, seriously curious.
>I'm her first ever everything, from kiss to sex.
Let a 27 y/o tell you: I might no know HOW traditional she is, but in these times nothing that happens at that age is forever.
Just don't get too attached.

>>114970103
>Pareto principle
That's the widest stretch I've ever heard from the original principle. Still appreciated, my dear perkele.

>>114970919
>>Would you die for your parents? You most likely wouldn't.
Gas yourself.

>>114970919
And as I said, the same rule applies to heterosexual couples. Men would most likely die for their wife they unconditionally love, but women wouldn't most likely die for their husband they conditionally "love".

After the parents of a man die, he will never be able to receive the direct and pure form of love. He will only be loved by his capability, and he lives in a delusion that he will be able to receive it because her mother gave it to him. This is how the nature fools the man, and makes him provide for the less capable.

>>114962339
>This is essentially why the top 20% of men (the high status males, best providers and protectors) "get" the vast majority (around 80%) of women.

There is probably not a single society on this planet where this is true. Man developed to live in a small groups, ~100-300 people big and even in the most archaic tribes you can observe that there is some sort of code/necessity to put man and women in pairs to mantain order and transparency of internal relations. This is desired by people and it will never change.

File: IMG_7357.jpg (140KB, 791x785px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 791x785px

>>114962339
>MGTOW
>Not Reproducing
>Redpilled

This is the future you deserve, Fuck off /r9k/

>>114972105
The 20/80 rule applies to everything in nature, including sexual selection.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_principle

File: IMG_7358.png (59KB, 600x413px)

59KB, 600x413px

>>114972839
>This is the retard who had a hissy fit over the procreation general

Why do Europeans favor white extinction so much?

>>114972973
I'm not against procreation. I'm just here because vast majority of men are ignorant and/or delusional. Understanding the principles of nature is important.

>>114972363
There are too many whites in the world already, its time for us to take over

>>114964964
>would a woman die for her husband? Hell no

That's a ridiculous statement to claim is true

>>114965631
He is right and you are naive.

>>114964964
>In this hierarchical sense, women are intermediate between men and children.

I knew it

>>114964122
>>114972363
You don't have to be MGTOW to realize the truth in finnbros OP.

women do not love men the same way as men love women. A wife's love for her husband comes with conditions. It is a contract.

A mother's love for her child comes with no such contract.

In the same sense, fathers do not love their children as much as mothers love their children. This is a fact of nature and can be observed in almost every mammalian species.

Don't attack based Finn for dropping uncomfortable truths. Own it, and realize that your destiny as a man is not to be loved and coddled, but to be honored and feared.

>>114966455
nigger detected

>>114966455
Even if you are an atheist, you still have honor. A person without any honor whatsoever is unable to function in society. This is a person that values no contract and abides by no law. Even the biggest cowards have some honor, though it is true we all have it to varying degrees, just as we all have sin to various degrees.

File: 1389957346662.png (97KB, 291x272px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 291x272px

>>114976142
Sounds like a Romulan

Women don't love children. They're the primary abusers of children and have no qualms about killing them if they're inconvenient (see: abortion, "Sudden Infant Death Syndrome", etc.).

Children are tools for them, after the hormonal biological imperative has been fulfilled. As with everything, they look at them from the point of view of "how is this useful to me".

>>114976515
You mean a Klingon?

>>114977376
Abortions happen when women are tricked into acting against their nature

>>114971300
Yeah, I know. Also phoneposter so that explains the lack of "s". I know we are young, but had wemet olderand would be total wife material. Pretty sad desu.

File: 12825952_1724940877727696_1886623516_n.jpg (63KB, 640x640px)

63KB, 640x640px

>>114977428
You dare question my honor?!

>>114977623
Also lack of spaces now. Pss.

>>114977376
Also by this logic love is an illusion since all love has a utilitarian origin

>>114977756
The prefect race would be a mix between the Klingons and Vulcans. Vulcan logic mixed with Klingon ambition and values would dominate

>>114977606

Here's a redpill for you: What you're seeing today is actual female nature, unrestrained.

>>114964964
> this attachment is not as strong as it was before
It has nothing to do with the love of the attachment. It has to do with coming to terms with the basic reality that your parents are as human as you. The faults in your parents become evident to your more cognitive mind, and in some cases you realize gross failings in their character and parenting.
Your graph is flubbed thoroughly in this regard. A child's "honor" for their parents is what shrinks as they mature, not their love for them. I love my mother to pieces, but I know for a fact that anyone who can have intercourse with more than 50 people in her life time, and then only marry and reproduce with the absolute worst candidates from that 50, is a severely damaged person with a sense of romantic love that's been twisted by the bad things that happened in her life. I pity that, but I don't respect or honor it, and I don't want to emulate it.

>>114978257
No. What we are seeing now is the product of social engineering in a toxic consumerist culture led by a global elite that wants to eliminate human ambition and turn us all into dependent peons.

File: Untitled.png (135KB, 854x696px)

135KB, 854x696px

fixed it

>>114962339
>20% of men get 80% of women
Ziph's law whoa.

>>114978901
That's homo

>>114978848
This.

Our lives are the products of weaponized pychology, perfected over decades of research and implementation world wide.

>>114978987
doesn't need to be gay

bros before hos my man

>>114962339
The Finngolian is correct. Anyone who disagrees just hasn't been hit with the truth yet. If you're young it'll happen eventually. If you're old maybe you're safe. Romantic love only exists if you're providing something for a woman that no one else can, or at least in quantities that no one else can. If she realizes she can get more from somewhere else you'll realize this Finngolian is right.

Oh no, women love their children more than their husbands lets all cry a fucking river about it.

If you're getting home cooked meals
If you're getting sex
If you're getting 100% commit
If you're getting a strong family bond

YOU ARE WINNING.
WHO CARES IF YOUR WIFE DOESN'T EXPERIENCE "LOVE" THE WAY YOU DO FOR HER?

>>114977623
I can assure you, there will be more wife material.
I fucked up some stuff later in life, ditched wife material for a quick fuck.
Shit happens, people are stupid. But there are so unbelievably many women, even in your vicinity.
Just don't overthink things

>>114978848

Read some history. This is invariably what has happened to civilizations that let female nature run rampant. They haven't changed in the last 5,000 years, there's no giant conspiracy to turn women into what they've become today.

This is what they are underneath the pretty (or not-so-pretty) exterior.

Feel free not to swallow this red pill and continue to deepen your denial, tho. Not my problem.

>> 20% of men (the high status males, best providers and protectors) "get" the vast majority (around 80%) of women

This is a nonsense.

> But I want 8, 9 and 10 level women

No wife wants to be your mother

Beggers can't be choosers

>>114979278
It's crazy. There have been poems and songs written about this since the beginning of written history. Think Sigfried and Brunnhilde. The old stories are always about the warrior proving himself and winning the maiden. The maiden never pursues the warrior. The story never ended because she like just felt like they weren't meant to be.

>>114979944
>No wife wants to be your mother

No, they'd rather be your daughter

>>114979828
I would love to see some historical documents which back up your claims.

If women have always been shitty it's because PEOPLE have always been shitty.

>>114980011
But that was back in the day when women were forced to be largely monagomous or at least forced to be secretive about cuckolding/adultery. Now they're being encouraged to be sluts by everyone.

>>114979828
Also I might add that not a single culture in human history has adopted equality between the sexes as a cultural norm like ours has, so it is impossible to test your hypothesis.

>>114965864
"Momma loves her baby, daddy loves him too, oooooh ooooh oh oh babe"

>>114980011
>The maiden never pursues the warrior.
There was a guy in the bible who was drugged and fucked by his own daughter.
> The story never ended because she like just felt like they weren't meant to be.
That's pretty much every story about Artemis. Her way of saying "no" just happened to be turning you into something.

>>114967426
I don't but that's probably just my autism. I don't feel remorse in any way shape or form towards others at all.

>>114979526
I don't. The reality is just sad know.

>>114979828
You're the one who has several redpills to swallow if you don't understand the full scale of social engineering that occurs in the West.

Your entire mindset is but another part of that engineering driving a divide between man and woman, to destroy the family unit, isolate individuals, and keep them dependent not on themselves and each other, but rather government.

MGTOW is another psyops campaign as well.

Go back to the CTR/ShareBlue/SourceAnon threads. Look at Tavistock.

>>114979073
Truth. OP is not wrong in discribing these trends, but his tone is almost intentionally absolving modern women of their lack of character. This only enables them, and discourages men. OP might talk a big redpill game, but he is as cucked as they come. He has given up on fixing society.

If the traditional family is to be saved, hollywood and all the propagandists need to be stripped of their power. They are to blame for women.

>>114973977
Virgin detected

>>114964964
There are untold legions of recorded situations in which women have given their lives for men they love.

You're a fucking fool and falling for jewish propaganda that drives you away from the white women of your homeland.

Stop being a fucking faggot who thinks about this shit, and then you will get laid with a qt and make her love you. If you're not a useless piece of shit, it's not that hard.

To those who are sceptical about this and trust those who they perceive intellectually superior to themselves more; it is not only my thought.

Arthur Schopenhauer and many other great philosophers knew this as well. Do your research.

>>114968227
Well, besides grandmothers.

>>114981032
Name seven kinos

>>114980429
I hate to go back to "muh jooz" because this thread has been largely free of that meme.

But Jewish culture seeping into the mainstream is a direct cause of this.

>>114981178
Google it tbqh

Im not here to educate you :^)

File: IMG_0969.jpg (184KB, 960x955px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 960x955px

>>114962339
Nigger this was like the first red pill

Most of us came here because some bitch fucked us over or destroyed our misty eyed idealized and childlike view of women and relationships

Down the rabbit hole you go and a few years later you are kek vulting off to Constantinople to raise the banner of Christendom once again

>Another proof for hierarchy of love is the fact there are much more male pedophiles than female pedophiles. 94% of all sexual abuses towards children are done by men in the US, and the number stays roughly the same all around the world.
Completely wrong.

The only way you could possibly get those numbers is if you look at the number of convictions. Because cases of child sexual abuse go unreported very often, it is important to look at victimization surveys rather than actual convictions. Another reason why you should go by victimization surveys is because women are treated more leniently in the justice system.

>>114981032
Again, anecdotes and saying that I don't get laid wont prove the general rule wrong.

Learn to argue.

File: 1488278675414.jpg (141KB, 1000x466px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 1000x466px

>>114980874
Society is close to the fall if you couldn't tell. How many kids do you have to further the white race right now autist?

>>114981549
This is an intelligent post.

>>114962339
that pill is not very intimidating

i have a many orders of magnitude beyond that "pill"

>>114979828
This exactly

Without massive social pressures to keep women in line this is what always happens

As a society gets rich and decedent those social pressures loosen allow for women and men to act on base urges instead of duty and the system begins to slowly degrade

So right as a society is hitting its peak, with the most wealth power and influence it's ever wielded the small social interactions and culture of the civilization are already rotting away

After several decades the edifice cannot hide the internal rot and the whole thing comes undone

>>114980799
Are you referring to Lot's daughters? That didn't end well for them.

Artemis was a virgin. I was referring to women who get into relationships and then want out because they just aren't feeling it, and then move on to the next helpless Chad or Jamal that comes along.

>>114966867
I'm sorry, Spainbro. Know that God's love is the greatest there is. You'll see her again someday if you keep that in mind.

>>114982204
Yeah don't you get the lesson ?

>>114966335
fat lesbians on 4chan

>>114979477
>I look at flag
Why am i not surprised?

>>114966867
start looking for other girls, she's already cheating on you.

File: IMG_0420.jpg (137KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 1500x1000px

>>114973825
>express confusion
>notice flag

File: 1475371937497.jpg (999KB, 1568x2146px)

999KB, 1568x2146px

>>114981730
Why the hell do you think that happened? Do you just conviently forgot the idea of the "deep state"? Of the (((oligarchy))) that controls us?

The same groups who utilized alphabet agencies to infiltrate and subvert any potential grass roots protest? Like say feminism?

For the purposes of divide and conquer?

Use some critical thinking skills. WHY are things like this? How did women come to themis point? (((Who))) led them there?

>>114962339
werd this hurt when i came to this realization

>>114969393
he actually acts masculine. that puts you above 80% of the "nice guys" that men are today.

>>114982310
I understand the moral of the biblical story of Lot's daughters, yes

>>114982204
>Are you referring to Lot's daughters? That didn't end well for them.
I think I am, but I don't remember what happened to them.
I thought they both fucked off to different parts of the desert, and God kinda winked at the whole thing because "fuck it, I need more of ya around."
>Artemis was a virgin.
Not for lack of men trying. She turned one guy who tried to rape her into a woman, another guy who she caught spying on her in the bath was turned into a deer and eaten by his own hounds.
Not sure what the fuck her priorities are, but that's definitely her saying "yeah, this shit isn't happening."

>>114982469
I assure you she isn't. When I say she was pure I meant it. I could see her as long term companion. The problem is the age. I'm too young for that shit.

>>114982809
There will always be outliers.

It's why there are black conservatives too

>>114980589

I keep forgetting burgers don't really learn history in school.

Look at Greece and Rome. Rome, specially, in the latter days had laws regarding divorce to favour the wife (and divorce was rampant), practiced abortion on the regular, and gave women more and more influence in the public sphere (yes, under the emperor).

Those who forget history have a tendency to repeat it. You don't need the extent of today's move for equality for female nature to show its true face. Men are the ones who love romantically (and, dare I say, naively). Women are opportunists.

>>114981302
I know. Before I realized who was to blame for this problem I always thought the whole "da joos" thing was a joke. Once I realized the fucking Jews ruined women as Hitler predicted they would I went full 1488.

Heil Hitler.

>>114983135
Apparently in many public schools history is now basically "everyone was an evil racist" then the 60's happened and the world fixed itself and stopped whitey

File: 1488279472684.jpg (2MB, 1662x4350px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1662x4350px

>>114982715
I already know who did this autist. I want to know how many white kids you have in order to prevent this. Or are we supposed to live by your hypocritical standards?

>>114983135
How many female senators were there?

File: IMG_3547.jpg (45KB, 631x499px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 631x499px

>>114962339
>Jew
>lecturing people on love
Are insects capable of love? Srs question

File: 1487982198026.jpg (375KB, 867x1000px)

375KB, 867x1000px

>>114983135

>>114962339
Do you have any proof of these claims? Anecdotal evidence doesn't count, since I can provide a dozen counterexamples and it doesn't change a thing. You've essentially written down your unsubstantiated theory and expect others to believe an anonymous poster on his word alone.

>>114983119
no, actually he is in the top 20% of men who actually act masculine.
he is in the top percentage.

>>114969877
This. Op is bullshit.

>>114964122
>race treason

Get back to breeding more apes you monkey.

>>114964964
I will always love my parents.

>>114983511
None, because I'm not white ;^)

>do have twins on the way however

>>114983746
It's not just my "unsubstantiated theory". You should learn about the nature of a women here: http://www.theabsolute.net/misogyny/

Especially the one from Schopenhauer

http://www.theabsolute.net/misogyny/onwomen.html

>>114983179
I think it's more than just the Jews, personally. They're about 40% of the problem.

The enemy does not follow the Jewish religion or worship Yahwey. These are satanists and Freemasons. Koch is as much of a problem as Soros. All the Jews in Roswell outside of Atlanta are conservative as fuck. And not Glenn Beck (((conservative))) either. The city of Atlanta has been trying to flood their communities with dindus for decades and they won't have it.

Thanks for the thread OP. I thought I was the only one who realised that

File: 1484411082604.png (17KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 900x900px

I guess this is how the white race dies, Converting people into Nihilist bullshitters who think having kids is bad for the world.

I like how procreation threads are always ignored, While pro-extinction threads like this are always filled with (You)s.

/r9k/ killed /pol/

>>114985092
Where did OP advocate for not having kids?

File: 1400893654618.jpg (156KB, 514x585px)

156KB, 514x585px

>>114985047
>>114981730
>>114977376
>>114973825
>>114975420


Yeah listen to OP goyim, Don't have white kids they won't love you. Let whites go extinct it's good for u...I mean to help the world.

>>114985512
Kids like me, it's the women that hate me for some reason

>>114985269
Nihilism and MGTOW are against having children or an offspring entirely. OP was the same autist who had a hissy fit in one of the procreation threads from last night.

Don't listen to this faggot.

>>114980874
Dumbass. Probably a bigger dumbass than op

File: pushers.jpg (308KB, 720x900px) Image search: [Google]

308KB, 720x900px

>>114985512

>>114981723
What general rule? Your only basis for thinking that children don't love their parents or that women don't love men is your own anecdotal experience of not loving your parents. You're trying to fit reality into this system of categorization and it doesn't seem to be working

>>114985661
How did OP specifically advocated for MGTOW?
>>114973697
>I'm not against procreation

File: 1488338604555.jpg (148KB, 494x736px)

148KB, 494x736px

>>114985512

>>114985269
This guy >>114985661 >>114985512 is schizophrenic and loses his mind every time a thread like this comes up. There's always someone like him, maybe it's a woman, i don't know. But for whatever reason they just go crazy

>>114985661
I don't advocate for nihilism or MGTOW.

I'm just saying how it is.

>OP was the same autist who had a hissy fit in one of the procreation threads from last night

I honestly have no idea what you're talking about.

>>114985512
No one is advocating for MGTOW

Show me exactly where I or anyone else said "don't have kids"

>>114986148
>He's a schizophrenic

I'm not asking you to find women surrogates exist, But however most of you do blindly hate children just like women do.

>>114986144
>>114985883

>haha check mate look at this funny meme I found that agrees with me

Not an argument

File: finnishautism.png (41KB, 936x238px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 936x238px

>>114986170
You sure this isn't you buddy?

>>114986556
>I'm not asking you to find women surrogates exist, But however most of you do blindly hate children

No, just fuck off

>>114986556
>not an argument
Not an argument

Men have a weird fantasy of a loving female figure that provides them with affection. It's an image they got in their childhood. But this fantasy can only remain intact through their separation from it. The figure doesn't exist, it was unreachable from the start.

This isn't a failing in women, this is a male delusion.

Love however, is very different from this. It's innately irrational, an act of faith, and therefore it has a chance of being truly universal. Ostensibly, both men and women can do it, but it has to be passionate and painful.

File: racemixinghorrors5.gif (6KB, 350x269px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 350x269px

>>114986702
Someone's upset he doesn't realize it's the two sides of the same coin.

>>114985092
I agree.

>>114986148
that would make sense

Probably fat too

>>114962339
Just wanted to say that this is correct in the general sense, but there's exceptions to every rule.
You just gotta find them.

>>114986678
Nope. I rarely come here anyway, I mostly spend time on /int/.

I just wanted to share some of my thoughts which I think are correct.

I don't think everyone should have children, though, since I strongly advocate for eugenics, but don't know an ethical non-fascist way to pursue it. I hope in the future everyone can have "quality" children thanks to embryo selection. I also believe that there should be much less humans, but the humans should be of certain type, and that type is most prevalent among European populations.

>>114987351
Or make them. OP is describing a dynamic. You're just as much a part of it as the woman.

EVERY SINGLE RETARD WHO IS UPSET BY THE OP IS A WORTHLESS CUNT WOMAN TRYING TO DISTRACT PUSSYWHIPPED MEN FROM THE DISMAL REALITY.

File: depopulation.png (650KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

650KB, 960x720px

>>114987570
Okay sorry for the misunderstanding

>>114987593

I think your asshole might've been whipped due to the caps lock.

>>114964122

ask a CIA officer

yeah ou fuck whores, or you are one

but getting married? having a relationship

impossible and dangerous

>>114987573
There's millions of years of evolution behind this.
I wouldn't bet my life on it, but I think that it'll probably be hard to "make" an exception to a biological rule unless you start the indoctrination process at a very young age.
Basically what you're looking for are "biological defects", not simply people with a different mindset. At least that's what I'm thinking coming from a biological/ethmological background.

Ask yourself this, if you were horrifically injured or if you lost your job and became poor or if you became a social pariah for posting on /pol/, would your girlfriend/wife still love you and be with you?

No, she'd leave as fast as possible. Or worse, she'd say she'd stay but just end up leaving anyway. Women can't love a man for himself. The majority of women can't love anything period. But the very few that can are precious and always taken and live happy lives.

File: 0e9.jpg (24KB, 499x499px)

24KB, 499x499px

>>114962339
So what you're saying is I should fuck my mom because she loves me and if I love her we'll be a perfect couple?

>>114988209
A mother's love is platonic in nature, but sure. If you somehow manage to turn it romantic then you're probably set.

>>114986843

this is why histrionics are so dangerous

WE SAW FROM HWNDU THAT /POL/ HAS A DELUGE OF WHORES WHO ONLY SEEK ATTENTION FROM SAD, LOSER MEN - UNCONTESTED AND ABSOLUTE.

http://www.salon.com/2017/02/26/theres-no-going-back-racial-ethnic-diversity-is-on-the-rise-in-american-communities_partner/

Ahh smells like the death of whites now doesn't it? Thank You Nihilism for saving the day

File: 1487965384238.png (373KB, 1100x900px) Image search: [Google]

373KB, 1100x900px

>>114981032
>There are untold legions of recorded situations in which women have given their lives for men they love.

Proofs?

>>114986843
This

It's a mark of someone who has never loved. They do not realize the sacrifice that goes into raising a family. These are the same children who think they're entitled to a qt aryan wife just because of muh superior genes.

>>114988670
The white non-hispanic birth rate is proof, Look how much it's declining. Pablo is having thirty something kids while you guys are having none. kek

>>114962339
wow you're a massive faggot

>>114989495

To those who actually will have kids, Check out my thread over here.

FUCK YOU SLOOTS. BREAK THE CHAINS OF WHOREDOM.

WOMEN WOULD STOOP TO ANY LOW, EVEN FEIGNING RACIAL LOYALTY AND AWARENESS TO DUPE WHITE MEN INTO BEING THEIR FODDER. SAD!

>>114986843
>Men have a weird fantasy of a loving female figure that provides them with affection. It's an image they got in their childhood. But this fantasy can only remain intact through their separation from it. The figure doesn't exist, it was unreachable from the start.
>This isn't a failing in women, this is a male delusion.

This is your projection

>>114988983
Wut

Nigger how does that have anything to do with the post you replied to?

Tits or GTFO
And then kys

>>114989695
>you're projecting
>no YOURE projecting
This is some liberal-tier debating right hurr

Top kek

>>114989662
Women show loyalty to strong and dominant men, doesn't matter what tribe, nation, group, race or anything they are. If they are more dominant than other men and stand higher, women surround them.

If white men become stronger and more dominant than men of other races (essentially means abandoning cuck policies), women will be loyal to them once again.

>>114989459
truly proved him wrong

>>114991090
It's falling on deaf ears tho. These faggots would rather be virginal victims than make the necessary lifestyle changes. This is literal nigger-tier thinking.

>you should stop being a beta chuck expecting women to love you without providing anything
waaaah MGTOW race traitor why do you want white genocide???!!!

File: women.png (252KB, 1280x544px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 1280x544px

This made me ponder