Why do people pretend that Panasonic and Olympus are stills cameras

Because they are cheap brands who make cheap cameras for cheap people.

Just because they do quite well in video doesnt mean they have to abandon making cameras for old people/dole scum

>>3143121
why is this board so obsessed with m4/3 that there is a dozen threads bashing it? also, Olympus video sucks, no one uses them for that and the company focus is on stills

>>3143163
Why are you so obsessed with what other people think? You aren't insecure about your micropenis camera sensor, are you?

>>3143193
>implying i shoot m4/3
>implying having multiple threads about the same shit is a good thing
kys

File: IMG_0992.png (488KB, 670x941px) Image search: [Google]

488KB, 670x941px

>>3143195
Complaining that posts aren't all organized into neat tidy general threads is a literal and unironic symptom of autism or obsessive compulsive disorder. Seek help, buddy.

>>3143121
The first olympus video camera is the newest one

>>3143193
Big sensor is to compensate for small dicks

>>3143539
>he doesn't shoot his dance school auditions on his olympus video ccamera
https://youtu.be/fOG-JGtdAGI?t=50s

>>3143544
So what, it's a cheap camera and it does well in taking stills