Should I get an a6500 or a6300? Is the IBIS and touchscreen worth

>>3140259

If you shoot video, ibis is worth it

if you shoot video, don't ever buy a fucking sony, go for the gh5

if you shoot stills, go for the a6300, or even a6000

>>3140270
>if you shoot video, don't ever buy a fucking sony, go for the gh5

unless you are planning to shoot a lot of low light video

>>3140314
What is rolling shutter for 500 please. Who cares about low light if you literally can't pan ever for video without your entire video turning into jello.

>>3140314
Yes, the a7IIs is totally worth it for the AMAZENG LOHW LITE if you don't care about ergonomics, weather sealing, decent stabilization, workable touchscreen
The Low-Light argument is really only valid if you shoot cinematic productions without any lighting, which barely anyone does but hardcore documentary filmmakers.
It's a bloody meme. Just like "so small and light body!" Because 95% of lenses are still gonna make the entire setup heavier and bigger than most smaller sensor Mirrorless cameras.

>>3140259
Yes, ibis is absolutely worth it. I bought the a6300 exactly one month before the 6500 was announced (they were announced 6 months apart) and got cucked hard. The 4k on the 6300 is jello without stabilization. I use the kit lens on it and have been very happy with it, especially since it's stabilized, but really wish I had the 6500. Just spend the extra 500, it will be worth it in the long run. Still love my little 6300 though