When will 4chan.org support 360° photos? [EXIF data availa

>>3133207
When 360° photography is the newest meme that gearfags squabble over like currently over 4k and LOAH LEIGHT PURFORMENCE!

>>3133211
>my dslr shoots 720p video and is terrible above ISO 400
>everything better is a meme

>>3133213
See, this is the kind of dedication to shittery and cancer that I call the heart of /p/
If we can get this kind of passion to the field-of-view discussion, we can have 360° support on this board in no time

>>3133223
Come again? I'm not the one shit posting that advancing camera technology and features is equal to photography "memes". As if improved low light performance is not one of the most important advancements in photography since digital came about.

>>3133232
>The thing I'm being a shitty little baby about is VALID
Doesn't matter if it's valid or not. Only that you're being butthurt over people calling you a shitposter.

>>3133233
>newest meme
>gearfags
>LOAH LEIGHT PURFORMENCE

Your original post reeks of butthurt over the fact that you can't afford a nice camera. Chill out.

>"People on this board are a bit dense about stuff"
>"BUTTHUUUUUUUUURT LOOOOK AT MEEEEE, VALIDATE MY BRAND LOYALTYYYYY!"

Yeah, sure, you fellas seem like the level headed ones

stop talking about cameras and take pictures

nice house b

File: IMG_1841.jpg (575KB, 2048x1364px) Image search: [Google]

575KB, 2048x1364px

>>3133207
it good photo. mine make nice planet only moonlight used 10 minute exposures

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1364
Scene Capture Type	Standard