/p/eople. I'm going on a trip in sept/oct. I need a photo

>>3132551
I daily a redbee 210, its bretty good. you can fit a sainsbury's chicken dinner in the top pocket

>4 or 5 prime lenses

At that point, just get a god damn zoom faggot

>>3133050
Ok, thanks. what bag do I carry my camera and 2 or 3 new zoom lens in?

I have a waterproof roll top that I keep smaller camera bags inside as inserts. Modular bags seem to be trending, and this was a budget friendly solution based off of things I already own. Using a normal bag also allows me to carry other things, which can be handy. I used this on a 4 day trip into NYC as my only bag, and everything I needed fit fine, just unpack the clothes and stuff at the hotel. Plus, it doesn't look like a camera bag, since it isn't.

To supplement I'll generally carry a small fanny pack, and keep my most used alternate lens, some cleaning supplies, and a battery inside. If I lived in a colder climate I'd probably just use a coat.

File: TahoeBP_150_Stuffed1_SQ.jpg (293KB, 1500x1500px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 1500x1500px

>>3132551
I can only speak from personal experiance, but I have a Lowepro Tahoe BP 150 that I'm pretty happy with. It fits my camera body, 3 lenses and a flash, as well as a charger, tablet, ect. If you're a gear fag that has to take everything with you it's probably not the best tho.

>>3132551
NatGeo Walkabout backpack
or Lowepro 400AW backpack

If camera gear is all you're carrying these specialized Lowe-pro-type bags are nifty, but I am usually carrying a bunch of other stuff, so just pack everything in its own quilted bag or pouch and drop 'em in a Jansport or equal.

>>3134023
Second the Lowerpro 400AW, I took most of my stuff to Scotland from France (3 lenses, canon 60D, grip, coin filters, flashes etc.) with room to spare in the front pocket.

A major advantage is the waterproof(-ish) cover. Plus the opening is at the back so no need to worry about your shit disappearing all of a sudden.

Vinta s-series modern sleek and practical.

File: images.jpg (7KB, 248x203px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 248x203px

>>3132551
>have big, wide back as I work out obsesively
>Into photog
>parents gift me a tiny lowepro (I mentioned I wanted a small bag to carry around all day)

I never put it on properly as I look like a tumblr alt girl

>>3135061
stats?

>>3132551
I use this $90 Manfrotto backpack which opens from the back. Carries a d810 and 3 lenses just fine, as well as not screaming "I AM A CAMERA BAG PLS STEAL ME"

same situation here, but I also want to take my 15Inch macbook + charger with me.
So the camerabackpack should have a protected area for the macbook.
Any suggestions?

>>3132551
If you're taking more than 3 lenses, you need to plan better. a 35, an 85 and a 24-105 is everything you need unless you're doing something specific that requires a 3-400mm and then you can leave the 85 and 24-70 at home.

>>3135453
Op here. It's a wide, normal and telephoto prime, then a couple cheapo toy lenses for some lomo docking around. So yea, it is 3 lenses, but then some toys.

>>3135190

5'8" 185# and my most recent Fran time was 9:12

>>3135784
I have no idea what a Fran is, that's a crossfit thing isn't it?

Was looking for a s/b/d desu

Tenba camera insert with any bag you already own. I love my Rains backpack that can take a beating and shit weather, or a Herschel that's comfortable, then I just throw the insert in.

Also, don't bring so many lenses, it's fucking stupid. Choose two and use your feet to frame the picture. Or get a zoom, don't be a faggot.

>>3135810
You win. 10 Internet to you, my friend. This option wins hands down.

Btw, 2 small primes are lighter and smaller than 1 zoom. And all my primes are "vintage" manual (read cheap).