Alright so this is a studio image of a modelI did late last year,

>>3132265
shes blended with the background.

do you have more?

>>3132266
This is her MM, but it's limited. I'm not sure if she has a personal portfolio site.

http://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/3059402/viewall#/37360289

>>3132273
more of YOUR PHOTOS you mouthbreather.

File: IMG_2674.jpg (1MB, 2308x3463px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2308x3463px

>>3132276

I have a lot of photos of her. Are you looking for nudes? I don't have any. This isn't /s/. I'm here for professional critique.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 6D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2015:06:14 20:45:01
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/7.1
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	1000
Lens Aperture	f/7.1
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	75.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	2308
Image Height	3463
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3132278
She's a low tier striper/

>>3132278
You are processing way too hard. The images lose all realism. Kinda like greesy oil paintings. Post the unprocessed version so we can see what you are working from.

Your lighting and composition is good though.

>>3132278
>wants critique
>pretend someone asked you for nudes of your models when that was absolutely the furthest from what actually happened
>gets super defensive when your perv assumption was corrected and people ask for more of your photos to form an actual critique that isn't just based on a single photo

lol "professional" critique. who are you paying?

>>3132265

Too red and the blown out patches on her cheeks are distracting.

>>3133268
>You are processing way too hard.

this. Too much noise. Too much grain.

>>3132265

As opposed to other here, I somehow like your overprocessing. I think that your problem is composition, specifically how you place and cut off the model according to your frame and in essence, to her looks. You have to learn to be more sensitive to how a person is shaped: this model is on the 'heavy' side with large breasts and thicker upper arms with a stocky neck, and it makes it worse when you cut off her forehead like that, because the face is not the main focus here. This makes her heavy body, shorter neck and smaller face stand out even more in a bad way. You tried to place a person that will never look light and elegant awkwardly, in an attempt to create an elegant picture. Instead you created a disharmony.
Get her to do poses with more power and roundness, where her softer face can compliment and lessen the bulkiness of her upper frame.

>>3132265
>>3132278
dear lord talk about over-edited

Post the raw vs edited for real feedback. Youre doing way too much in post although its apparent you have a shred of talent.

whole grain part of a balanced processing?