Are you photos A E S T H E T I C https://everypixel.com/aes

File: P1080147 TWO.jpg (1MB, 842x1120px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 842x1120px

SERIOUSLY?
This is with 71% my best.
Although I get a lot of 0.0% so I guess it isn't quite there yet

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Camera Model	DMC-G70
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.16
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2016:07:11 01:50:01
Exposure Time	1/800 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	-2 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	14.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	842
Image Height	1120
Exposure Mode	Auto
Image Quality	Unknown
White Balance	Auto
Focus Mode	Unknown
Spot Mode	Unknown
Image Stabilizer	Mode 1
Macro Mode	Normal
Shooting Mode	Aperture Priority
Audio	No
Flash Bias	0.00 EV

>>3129030
I'm guessing you are not quite there yet if this is your best.

File: lol1.jpg (315KB, 1308x856px) Image search: [Google]

315KB, 1308x856px

lol

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:07 21:29:10
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1308
Image Height	856

File: Rockwell.jpg (196KB, 1171x573px) Image search: [Google]

196KB, 1171x573px

Works great

File: IMG_3075.png (1MB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 750x1334px

Felt p gud

File: IMG_3076.png (1MB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 750x1334px

>>3129035
...until

File: DSC_5572-12020.jpg (188KB, 1000x1003px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 1000x1003px

>>3129034

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1200
Image Height	1535
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:06:23 22:42:57
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1000
Image Height	1003

>>3129037
It probably noticed that disgusting gap in the door

File: nice.jpg (163KB, 1281x581px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 1281x581px

>>3129014

File: Snek.png (230KB, 840x409px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 840x409px

>>3129014
Nice

File: Rex.png (261KB, 852x396px) Image search: [Google]

261KB, 852x396px

It is truly advanced.

>>3129034
Go to bed Ken

File: Ken.png (416KB, 836x492px) Image search: [Google]

416KB, 836x492px

>>3129034
It does

File: okcool.jpg (125KB, 1371x565px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 1371x565px

What the fuck

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer	luk
Image-Specific Properties:

File: Screenshot (3).png (744KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

744KB, 1920x1080px

wow it rates all my unposted photos better than my posted

kinda of tempted to get the results for each of my instagram photos and analyze against the number of likes i get

>>3129096

No change because Instagram is full of plebs.

why can't I upload anything reeeeeeeee

File: oh nice.jpg (170KB, 1831x764px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 1831x764px

>>3129014
oh nice

File: EveryPixelHipsterTrash.png (868KB, 1380x1740px) Image search: [Google]

868KB, 1380x1740px

Okay, did an experiment.
First and last image were some I still had around from ancient times, the lower one shot with BW-Setting on my Camera I dunno why it creates those waves like that. The middle image is the top one just desaturated.
Could it be the algorithm is just pulling high-rated images from the web?

>>3129106
Enable JS

>>3129064
Not until you donate to my growing family

>>3129136

It is reeeeeeee

>>3129180
>males, caucasian ethnicity
>0.0% chance that this image is awesome
this triggers the /pol/

File: e.png (577KB, 1280x605px) Image search: [Google]

577KB, 1280x605px

>a quick snapshot of my boss is the most atheistic shot of mine
huh?

>>3129049
the epitome of Male Beauty

File: 1Ag1Ykbq_400x400.jpg (18KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 400x400px

>>3129049
>caucasian ethnicity

File: Capture - Copy.jpg (84KB, 1478x567px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 1478x567px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: Capture1.jpg (99KB, 1407x475px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 1407x475px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: 1.jpg (1MB, 2418x1117px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2418x1117px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Width	2418
Image Height	1117

File: Capture.jpg (133KB, 2105x873px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 2105x873px

Whelp

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer	Morten
Image-Specific Properties:

File: Capture.JPG2.jpg (88KB, 1445x595px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 1445x595px

That's it /p/
This is the best photo that can be taken.

>tilted beach
>noisy as fuck
>random light painting
>everything blurry

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer	Morten
Image-Specific Properties:

File: muhfivepercent.png (859KB, 1481x934px) Image search: [Google]

859KB, 1481x934px

fuck this bullshit

File: 90percentacurracy.png (546KB, 1558x900px) Image search: [Google]

546KB, 1558x900px

Well I'll be damned

File: Kang.png (362KB, 971x765px) Image search: [Google]

362KB, 971x765px

>>3129201
How dat make you feel white boy?

File: IMG_3833.jpg (54KB, 640x1000px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 640x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Comment	Screenshot
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	640
Image Height	1000

>>3129030
Would look nicer if you under exposed the inside of the cave more and had something more interesting right outside the doorway

File: temp.jpg (223KB, 1361x625px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 1361x625px

>>3129131
I think what it does is that it compares it to what stock images sell the best.

Like not what image is the best image, just what one would make the most cash

File: temp.png (478KB, 1347x629px) Image search: [Google]

478KB, 1347x629px

>>3129332
>tfw I took a better photo than this faggot

>>3129336
>>3129332
wouldn't that indicate which photo will sell the best then?

File: 1.png (440KB, 1378x543px) Image search: [Google]

440KB, 1378x543px

wew lad

File: Screenshot_20170808-001307.png (1MB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1080x1920px

What's up cucks I am now your god

File: pure A S T H E T I C.jpg (246KB, 1279x705px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 1279x705px

Top this with an original photo. I dare you.

>>3129358
Saw the rest of the thread nvm

>>3129359 see >>3129358

>>3129249
astronauts btfo

man, you guys take beautiful photos. makes me want to shoot more

>>3129359
>>3129358
see
>>3129255

>>3129255
I actually unironically enjoy this photograph though.

File: Untitled.png (464KB, 1443x540px) Image search: [Google]

464KB, 1443x540px

An easy way to beat it seems to be to post a portrait of a single person. Rule of thirds might also be a factor in the score. My portraits consistently score around the high 90s. Everything else, landscape, architecture, street, more abstract stuff tends to get really low scores. I mean it kinda makes sense, it might be easier for an algorithm to detect if a human face is following the rule of thirds than try to make sense of what's going on in a busy street scene. Also, I'm going to guess that certain tags might increase or lower your score.

Fuck off this was a thread months ago this website is full of shit

>>3129478
Don't get mad cause all your photos are 0.0%

>>3129480
>Fuck off this was a thread months ago
Can you read?

File: 33.png (468KB, 1269x557px) Image search: [Google]

468KB, 1269x557px

>>3129474
this is weird

File: Bildschirmfoto 2017-08-09 um 15.49.21.jpg (717KB, 2619x1622px) Image search: [Google]

717KB, 2619x1622px

>>3129014
clearly works

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Photos 2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72
Vertical Resolution	72
Image Created	2017:08:09 15:49:21
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2619
Image Height	1622

File: Screenshot_20170809-103118.png (3MB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1440x2560px

I feel special now

File: Screenshot_20170809-171753.png (1MB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1080x1920px

>most scores hover around 10% or 99%

is this what they use for game reviews?

File: Hmm.jpg (97KB, 1480x606px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 1480x606px

nice

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer	Human
Image-Specific Properties:

>>3129323
it's a window in a tower.

File: Screenshot (239).png (729KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

729KB, 1920x1080px

Noice

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-10 at 21.55.40.png (88KB, 809x432px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 809x432px

ITT stupid /p/ fags who didn't even bother reading what sort of images the NN was trained on and what it idolises.

File: Screenshot_2.png (285KB, 1773x660px) Image search: [Google]

285KB, 1773x660px

>>3129014
I had higher hopes

File: Untitled.jpg (227KB, 1169x827px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 1169x827px

FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF

>>3129474
wowzers

>>3129014
It is a stock photo evaluating algorithm, doesn't mean shit

>>3130078
>England

File: neat.jpg (154KB, 998x546px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 998x546px

aw ya flatter me

File: Capture d'écran 2017-08-11 11.50.12.png (2MB, 2796x1330px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2796x1330px

not bad, not bad, i'm impressed

>>3129280
That bottom photo is fantastic, why do I never see interesting photos like that on /p, it's all just walls and empty views.

File: qt ai.jpg (140KB, 1339x600px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 1339x600px

Get on my level.