Thread replies: 5
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
File: 19904563_1934204710136957_2058703937_n.jpg (40KB, 612x716px) Image search:
[Google]
40KB, 612x716px
Film is better for producing nicer looking images.
Digital is better for reliability, practicality and cost effectiveness.
Whichever suits your personal requirements is better for you, but only for you.
Can we all shut the fuck up and agree that neither form of camera is objectively better?
>>
>>3128902
You are a fucking idiot of you don't think film is better. Look at all the greatest photographers in the world and what they use. Film. Kys.
>>
>>3128903
If I was a poorfag that was looking to photograph high-paced sporting events, would a digital camera not be better for me?
There is no objective answer, dummy!
>>
>>3128905
Yes if you are poor go digital. You don't deserve to have beautiful pictures because photography is a rich persons hobby.
>>
>>3128907
>Yes if you are poor go digital. You don't deserve to have beautiful pictures because photography is a rich persons hobby.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS3 Macintosh Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2011:10:24 16:42:48 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 325 Image Height 400
Thread posts: 5
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3