Thread replies: 10
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4
File: Overexposure.jpg (118KB, 492x209px) Image search:
[Google]
118KB, 492x209px
>send pics for printing
>we can't do it some parts are overexposed
>I 'fix' them
>the lights changes shape completely
(disregard the color)
Why can't they print the %100 white parts? I like how the lights turn out on my original edit. Rest of images is fine, only those 1-2 light sources are over.
If I bring it down to safe values you can see the shape changes completely.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Panasonic Camera Model DMC-GH4 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Photographer George Sardis Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.1 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 37 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 2048 Image Height 1365 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:08:03 19:39:07 Exposure Time 1/100 sec F-Number f/1.1 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/1.1 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 492 Image Height 209 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Soft Saturation Low Sharpness Soft
>>
>>3126404
> If I bring it down to safe values you can see the shape changes completely.
How is that surprising? Your light just looked like this.
Why don't you just edit the image accordingly?
>>
>>3126413
This is true. The light sources is how it is on the right. I like the experimental look of how it turns out if I go over and was wondering why the printers don't do whites over the 'safe' limits.
>>
>>3126426
just change the white point value to 254 or something in photoshop. highlights wouldn't be 100% white and you'd be good to go
>>
>>3126521
This could work on the pics I really want to keep this look. And use the histograms to check. Thanx doggo.
>>
Why wouldn't your printer be able to print values that are pure whites?
Post the whole image, maybe they had other reasons for trying to avoid printing your photos
>>
>>3126542
I will do it tomorrow. It is late.
>>
File: DAS_BACKLIT.jpg (173KB, 1137x768px) Image search:
[Google]
173KB, 1137x768px
>>3126542
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.1 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2017:06:14 17:53:31 Exposure Time 1/320 sec F-Number f/1.1 Lens Aperture f/1.1 Exposure Bias 0 EV Focal Length 19.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up
>>
File: MFW YOUR SPLITTONING.jpg (182KB, 2048x1152px) Image search:
[Google]
182KB, 2048x1152px
>>3126782
It's a shit picture anyway. Singer looks like a zombie, is too much in the dark, your preset is ugly.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-7M2 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.12 (Windows) Photographer David Mornet Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:08:04 14:54:07 Exposure Time 1/80 sec Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 1600 Brightness -1.3 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Tungsten Flash No Flash, Compulsory Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Hard Saturation Normal Sharpness Hard
>>
File: 1490811168512.png (44KB, 166x161px) Image search:
[Google]
44KB, 166x161px
Areas that are truly 100% white would have no ink applied to them. Why the printer thinks this matters at all is a mystery to me.
Thread posts: 10
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4