>IBM scientists have captured 330TB of uncompressed data

>>3126342
by the time that tech is matured enough to be used in consumer camera there would be 200MP medium format digital PnS with 2TB built-in memory already )))))))))

>>3126342
How exactly does high density tape storage affect film vs digital photography?

>>3126342
>Thats it, were going back to physical storage. Physical media confirmed superior.
Uh, what? This tape is digital storage for digital data, like HDD or NAND.

It doesn't help jack shit with film photography before it's digitized by a camera or scanner.

... digital wins again, if anything.

Also, this almost certainly won't make it into even digital cameras. The best we can hope for is that at some point someone lets us use standard 2.5" SSD or M.2 type of storage, but even that isn't going to happen easily.

>>3126357
hoheoheoeh tech isn't asymptotic no such a thing as physical limitation nonoo saturation ist'n a thing like tapes and shit right its 2017

>>3126342
lol you're like those idiots who fell for the "THROW YOUR IPOD IN THE TRASH! THIS CASSETTE TAPE HOLDS 56435435436 SONGS!!!!" headlines

>Physical media confirmed superior
You do realise that all storage is physical...

>>3126342
Magnetic tape is digital, just like hard disk is digital. All data storage is physical. Are you retarded? Did you think cloud storage was literally in the clouds?

You don't even know the difference between analog and digital, I hope you were "just pretending to be retarded xDDD"

>>3126416
Having a m.2 slot in a camera like the fuji gfx would probably be amazing, or even sports cameras in general

>>3126502
What the fuck? It's NOT in the clouds?! Holy shit, you ruined my whole day! How about you use a god damned spoiler next time, asshole! This is a big part of why /p/ sucks these days: assholes like you!