Are we ever going to get a digital sensor that even scratches

>>3126088
>I don't understand digital postprocessing
oh, it shows

>>3126088
You could make the digital image look exactly like the film image if you desired to do it.

>>3126120
>>3126099
Go on then, do it.

>>3126121
you need to give us a file there, hun

>>3126088
Foveon although gave good results but is an absolute design disaster as it raped CPU performance and battery life. Until someone buys the rights to manufacture, it's a dead system.

>>3126088
okay, digi sensors are optimized for being able to capture the most amount of darks and lights for all kinds of reasons. YOU CAN STILL BUMP UP THE CONTRAST AND SATURATION (AND NOISE) IN TWO SECONDS THOUGH.

File: jjjj.jpg (5MB, 3297x2295px) Image search: [Google]

5MB, 3297x2295px

>>3126121
A couple minutes in photoshop. Not perfect by any means but it proves a point. When supplied with a raw you can get whatever kind of image you want.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:03 02:53:45
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3297
Image Height	2295

>>3126121
Give me the raw file.

>>3126127
>his eyes are red
>the gold sequins are orange
>his lips still look like wax
>his collar is blown the fuck out
>the absolute STATE of those shadows

Can someone put grandpa back in the basement?

Film is dead, accept it

>>3126127
Lmfao, no.

Just look at the original shots, the skin in the film version has reds, yellows, oranges, purples.

The skin in the digishit is a flat beigey orange.

File: 1501737919136.jpg (2MB, 3297x2295px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3297x2295px

i tried too

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON
Camera Model	LS9000 FH-869GR
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	7435
Image Height	6302
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3000 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3000 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2017:08:03 07:51:22
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	3297
Image Height	2295

File: 1501737919136-03.jpg (1MB, 1652x2275px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1652x2275px

>>3126088
The h3dii was a pretty shit camera DESU.

A d700 would have done a better job.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON
Camera Model	LS9000 FH-869GR
Camera Software	Snapseed 2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Horizontal Resolution	3000 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3000 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2017:08:03 09:04:40
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1652
Image Height	2275

>>3126127
flat piece of shit with no tonality and highlights blown to fuck (but thats a limitation of the memeblad, you only made it worse).
>>3126228
you tried and sucked. pasty flat shit with ridiculous homogeneous skin tone.
>>3126231
lel we split toning now.

are you digisluggers even going to try? me, filmbro and photoshop master could make it look exactly like the original film one, but, even if you had my skills theres a little problem with doing that: that youre doing it based on an example, by imitation, like those fucks that "draw" by tracing a pre existing photo, but cant draw from scratch. are you always going to previously take a film photo of something so you have a template for how to make it look good in a digital version?

File: 1476478505105.png (84KB, 245x316px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 245x316px

>>3126236
Holy shit

>>3126238
not an argument.

>>3126231
For a JPEG edited in Snapseed that's close enough.
>>3126236
Filmbro you need to pit your money where your mouth is.
The whole copying thing is a strawman, as the entire premise of your OP was that the one couldn't emulate the other.

>>3126088
what the hell are you talking about?
right is clearly better.

>>3126282
lmao @ ur eyes.

>>3126088
Why does Digi need to stand up to how great film was?

Why can't film be great in its own way, separate from film, are you actually autistic?

Do you even own a camera?...

>>3126288
>Why does Digi need to stand up to how great film was?
because it came as a replacement technology and simply cant cut it. i wouldnt hate on digitrash if it was decent, but it isnt, it forces me to buy overpriced expired film to get some good stuff, because digifags cant be arsed to develop a strong technology that deliver good results that dont look like some videogame rendering.

>>3126288
Film's history has come to define various ideals of digital postprocessing. Obviously there's still the clinically sterile digital Nikon look, if you want that.

On the downside, raised blacks and x-pro filters all over various otherwise decent shit. Remembering that episode of Mythbusters makes my eyes ache in recollection.

>>3126088
Are filmfag ever going to be smart enough to use postprocessing software to their fullest extent instead of just settling for how their film looks right out the cam?

File: check.gif (28KB, 220x222px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 220x222px

>>3126088
http://yedlin.net/DisplayPrepDemo/

Your move, OP.

>>3126088
If you want to get the film look, shoot film. If you don't care much for it like me, shoot digital.

I'm not going to bite into filmfags trying to bait people with this same premise that film is "superior" and then wax poetic about esoteric bullshit like feels or magic. Fuck off.

>>3126088
wow i can't even believe different cameras take different pictures. thank you for this valuable informatoin OP.

>>3126368
leave them be, why create more competition for us
color grading is just a meme guys, move along

>>3126099
>>3126120
>>3126125
>>3126127
>>3126146
>>3126151
>>3126198
>>3126228
>>3126231
>>3126238
>>3126368
pathetic

>>3126451
Serious question - have you ever actually shot film?

>>3126456
why the hell would i use that hipster bullshit?

File: le hasselblad face.png (22KB, 418x559px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 418x559px

>/pol/ tier bait

>25 posters in thread

>>3126490
It's not even fresh bait.
>>3126476
Good answer.

>>3126247
lol of course filmdouches use /pol/ memes

>>3126495
imagine that digicucks are literally cucks