You guys got some Information about the Sony a7 Mark III? Like

My dad works at Sony

And the a7iii will feature a 100mp sensor
Carpal tunnel inducing controls
Horrible banding issues
No AA (shit)
Poor two axis Ibis
5fps burst with shudder
No lenses thanks to nex
And it came record for 20 minutes before overheating, and improvement over the a7ii and a9

Buy a Fuji xt2

File: IMG_1242.jpg (11KB, 464x261px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 464x261px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	464
Image Height	261
Scene Capture Type	Standard

Why are digital photographers so impatient? Isn't the original A7 good enough?

>>3122969
im planing to do an initial invest and want to know if its worth waiting

>>3122974
Cameras are about as bad of an investment as video cards (And especially so with Sony) since your new camera will almost always be surpassed by a slightly better one in a year's time.

>>3122969
the d700 is good enough for everyone, gearfags exist.

>>3122969
>Why are digital photographers so impatient?
Only applies to Sony owners. They don't actually use their cameras they just need an update every few months to keep them from getting bored

>>3122952
Rumors say an announcement is coming late this Fall, and some of the features from the A9 will be in it, like the AF.

>>3122974
Its worth waiting if you can IMO.

>>3122952
it's called the a9

File: 1475463136301.jpg (15KB, 217x190px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 217x190px

>>3123213
>mfw my friend just bought himself an A7SII
>A7III possibly in the works now
Here's hoping I can get the thing once he kills himself.

>>3122952
Wait I was debating buying an a7rii. Should I wait?

>>3122969
No, the original A7 isn't enough.

>>3123078
But that is actually why buying a new camera *is* a good purchase. You are getting something better.

I don't see how this could be any better, the photos (maybe selling them, maybe just getting good ones for yourself) are the goal and not making profits from selling the camera, right?

>>3123232
bsi, stacked, 24megapickle, no low pass filter, no crop full pixel readout downsample to 4K with h265 10bit 150Mbps internal encoding, clean iso6400 video, improved ibis + ois + eis to make gimbal deprecated, bentax like pixel shift stills, slog, 2 card slots, anamorphic full 3:2 video, 120fps 1080p, full swivel 4" lcd.

a7s ii is definitely kill.

>>3123182
It only applies to sony users because sony are the only people innovating and bringing out new features in their products (rip bentax).

Op, a7iii improvements over ii
Sub 30mp maybe bsi stacked sensor,
Same focusing system as a9
Touchscreen
Single high speed xqd slot

A7s range are video cameras
A7r range are studio cameras
A7 range are all rounders

Different tools for different purposes

I Cant wair. My last Camera Fell into a river when i was hiking. Never seen again. I hope for that bsi Sensor in the new a7 money is not a problem. i get paid jobs on a regular base. Im not a pro though. I just hope its gonna be a good update and not just one more i on the III Name

>>3123342
i can wait'

File: .png (45KB, 771x356px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 771x356px

So even the 1st gen A7 had 117 PDAF points? Then why was the AF so terrible?

>>3123667
Probably software and just general Sony bullshit where 1st models of anything are like buying an early access game on Steam.

>>3123688
>early access game on Steam
So all the sonyfags and sonyshitters come from /v/.

>>3123691
Both the Sony fanboys and the dudes paranoid about Sony shills came from /v/. I have no idea why, but there's been a bit of a /v/ leakage for a while now.

>>3123693
I heard someone say that /v/ banned discussion on hardware. That's probably the case.

>>3123340
>the a7iii will feature a 100mp sensor
>Carpal tunnel inducing controls
>Horrible banding issues
>No AA (shit)
>Poor two axis Ibis
>5fps burst with shudder
>No lenses thanks to nex


I just want the A9's thumbstick, if the A7III has it I am day 1 sold as a dual A7II user.

>>3123667
Coming from A6000 I don't think A7 AF is that bad, maybe it's a meme, maybe they're are parroting some ancient review from some youtube nigger who tried the camera when it first came out with kit lenses. Kit lenses or the FE 50/f1.8 is somewhat slow but when I tried the Zeiss 55/f1.8 or Zeiss Batis 85mm it's quite fast.

>>3123892

Kit lens/a7 combo is atrocious.

Kit lens is slow on any body really. 24-70 f/4 Zeiss is the way to go.

It is better with proper primes, but the a7ii and a7rii are even faster.

>>3123947
The $200 50mm is god awful too.

>>3123950

It is no longer god-awful with the most recent firmware update, but it is still quite slow.