https://nikonrumors.com/2017/07/24/ nikon-executive-mentions

>>3120082
>kill canon
If it fails like the DL line Nikon is over.

>>3120082
Sadly they call it D850 instead of D820 because they know they will be bankrupt before reaching D890.

>>3120232
Good, that means nikkor glass will be cheaper.

I've got a D810. I'm set for camera bodies until that thing dies which should be a long damn time from now. I could give three shits less if Nikon goes out of business in the ensuing time.

too bad dslrs are on their way out

>>3120270

Among the hobbyist dabbler bracket, maybe. They have a stranglehold on the pro market and will for the foreseeable future.

>>3120284
pros don't give a fuck about brand loyalty, they can afford new gear. as soon as mirrorless offers more bang for your buck (i.e. soon) they'll jump ship

>>3120270
My favorite thing about this meme is that it continues to have life, year after year after year after year.

>>3120422
>soon™

I just want to scoop a cheap D810 from Craigslist once all the dads go out to upgrade

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epaRJ3eqKzk

>>312052
>>3120519
keep kidding yourselves, mirrorless offers superior lens design constraints and nikon is out of the sensor game to boot
you think nikon will finally introduce good sensor-based autofocus this time around? or good camera firmware? nah, this will be an 810 with more pickels and glowing buttons.

Why, oh why can't industry insiders post on /p/ and tell us secret information...

>>3120626
>good sensor-based autofocus
Have you seen this?
https://nikonrumors.com/2016/11/23/nikon-two-layers-sensor-patent.aspx/
Basically this design enables on-chip quad-pixel phase detection AF and each AF point would be cross-type. In addition to that, the two layers have complementary colours, so you'd get 100% of the luminence data and a ton of other benefits. Nikon isn't completely out of ideas yet.

>>3120692
>so you'd get 100% of the luminence data

How's that?

Who else here owns a D800 and has no desire to upgrade whatsoever?

I'll probably use it for another 10 years or so.

>>3120714
>>3120714
Not him, but the first layer would capture one color and let the remaining colors pass.
For example a red pixel will let green and blue pass.

The second layer would capture all remaining light.

>>3120714
>>3120721
The patent describes it the other way around but that's the principle. For example red and blue would first be absorbed into a magenta layer and green would continue to the second layer. Green and magenta combined equals white, so nothing would be wasted.

>>3120716
Have a D810 and love it to death. Wouldn't mind a second body but I'm not sure about dropping another $3,000+ on another camera.

>>3120732
>>3120721
but how can you get 100% of the colour information without sampling all three of the primary colours at each photosite?

or is there something I'm missing when they combine CMY and RGB colour arrays?

I have a d750 and I want this.

I know I shouldn't, but I do.

>>3120741
You don't get 100% of the colour information, only 100% of the luminance. Basically the CMY layer captures light that would otherwise be wasted. The colours should be a little more accurate but that's not the point of the design.

>>3120741
And if you're confused about how all of the light can be captured, cyan, magenta and yellow are complementary colours to red, green and blue. With a normal RGB sensor each pixel captures one of the three colours and the other two are wasted. C, M and Y are made up of those two missing colours, so by having them in the top layer means that they can be captured as well. And having the CMY layer first also means that each pixel can utilize twice as much light as a standard RGB pixel before any loss of information happens. The first layer is translucent but there will always be some loss of information, so before that loss happens, more is is captured.

Taking bets now as to what the issue with this camera will be-

1. Oil spots on sensor
2. Left/back focus issues
3. Shutter exploding/causing flare
4. Other

>>3120975
Since this has taken so long to develop, I think they must have come up with some completely new and revolutionary ways to piss off their customers.

File: snicker.gif (1MB, 498x280px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 498x280px

>>3120993

>>3120975
Oh fuck, I forgot about the D600 oil fiasco.

I will say, though, that Nikon handled it well for me. I bought a D600, had the oil spots, called them, they asked me to take a picture of a white wall and email to a customer service rep, and within about a day they sent me a brand new D610. No questions asked. No forms or anything fancy.

>>3120797
I have a d3300 and almost got a d750, but decided to hold out. Thank god I did!

>>3120993
>automatic, unstoppable card reformatting
>exposure compensation slowly drifts as day goes on
>lens mount not lightproof
>explosive batteries release blinding gasses while camera is held to eye
>all 51 AF points fire at all times
>once burst mode is engaged, it can't be stopped until card is full or battery is run dry

>>3121021
Yaa, I got the D600 back in the day. After about a months use it had the "spots" visible so I took it to the dealer, the young clerk dude was skeptical but took it in for a service. Less than week later I got a mail to pick up my camera, it was cleaned and modified to new spec at no charge. The old seller guy who handed me the camera was clearly quite pissed at nikon for this mess. The whole ordeal was dealt well in my opinion, and didn't really put me off. The spots never showed again either.

In any case, it's a well studied selling tactic to "have something small go wrong" and then deal with the "problem" quickly and professionally. This tactic actually leaves the average customer more satisfied with the company than if the product didn't have any problems in the first place. However this tactic only works in certain type of situations, like business deals.

File: Nikon-D850-DSLR-camera-leaked-picture.jpg (230KB, 1241x1078px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 1241x1078px

https://nikonrumors.com/2017/07/26/breaking-first-nikon-d850-press-photos-leaked.aspx/

IT'S HAPPENING

File: Nikon-D850-DSLR-camera-leaked-picture-2.jpg (93KB, 898x572px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 898x572px

HAPPENING

File: WHY.jpg (17KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x360px

>>3121044
>swivel screen

FOR FUCK'S SAKE, NIKON. THIS ISN'T A D3000. WE DON'T NEED THOSE SHITTY ENTRY LEVEL DSLR GIMMICKS.

D810 price drop when?

>>3121046
I, for one, welcome our new tilting and flipping overlords.
t. landscape shooter

>>3121046
That shit is pretty useful for macro

>>3121046
You might be retarded. Swivel screens are super fucking useful.

Evf hybrid hype !

>>3120716
d750 here and I want to cum on that body every night

File: l333t.jpg (36KB, 251x251px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 251x251px

>>3121045
>>3121044

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS3 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2010:03:31 15:37:30
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	251
Image Height	251

>>3121051
>>3121058
>>3121068

I also wonder if swivel screens are easier to repair/replace?

>>3121045
What's the point of a tilt screen when live view has utter shit focusing and no focus peaking?

>>3121083
Composing low angled landscape of astrophotography shots where you manually focus scrub.

Source: 6'4" landscape photographer with a D750 who uses the flip screen all the fucking time.

>>3121087
Manual focusing is crud without focus peaking though

>>3121081
They are.

>>3121092
I mean if you're trying to focus on Usain Bolt, sure but I specifically said Landscapes and Astro so Magnify, manual focus and you can;t go wrong.

*Bu... but muh focus peaking QQ*

>>3121046
go back to dpreview, uncle bob

>>3121096
More like Nikon needs to get their act together and add in features that make live view usable. Even Pentax added OSPDAF to their new APS-C DLSRs. Canon blows the rest of the DSLR market away with theirs. If Nikon doesn't want to add OSPDAF at least they should add focus peaking.

>>3121092
It's going to have focus peaking you dimwit. It's going to have an evf in it that can be switched on. Watch theo's video

>>3121111
>theo
literally who

>>3121081
Yup, they are. Personally, I've never broken one.

>>3121113
Angry photographer

>>3121185
/p/ is truly the most disgusting place on the internet...

>>3121111
he's wrong all the time though

>>3120082
>cheap D750:s everywhere
jew_rubbing_hands_together.gif

Seriosly tho, I'll probably get a nice used D750 just for fun when all the dadtogs are upgrading. Get 35/2 & 85/1.8 af-d with it and I'm set for life. Maybe some sigma bazooka and an uwa prime later.

File: 1422763576814.gif (614KB, 400x225px) Image search: [Google]

614KB, 400x225px

>>3121578
>>cheap D750:s everywhere
>jew_rubbing_hands_together.gif

Why didn't they make the D7500 good, so I could get a cheap D7200? No one except dad boners is going to "upgrade"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQPlPP6mWVA

It's settled. Nikon shooters are the coolest kids on the block.

>>3121597
Fucking Asians

>>3121111
>it's going to have it because some random dipshit with a sketchy record said so

Or we could, you know, wait until we have actual details for the actual camera from the company itself.

File: laughing office space.gif (2MB, 480x452px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 480x452px

>>3121594
>complaining about the price for entry-level dslrs

>>3121597
what is this and why does it exist

>>3121597
This is *almost* as good as the music video for the guy who shoots models all day in the sun with his nikon camera.

rumoured to have a Hybrid EVF/OVF pentaprism.

>>3121748
Baseless rumor from a literal retard

>>3121648
And why did they go through all that trouble yet hire such a shitty singer that made the auto-tune bed for mercy?

This will do 4k video as a dickslap to canon's latest competitor and as such Nikon will win enthusiasts' hearts but their money still goes to Sony due to their mirrorless magic cameras.

>>3121782
and if the retarded is right?

>>3121912

it would be pretty neato

>>3121912
pointless because nikon users hate EVF

>>3121829
5dm4 does 4k though. Standard DSLR crop crap though.

https://nikonrumors.com/2017/07/27/the-nikon-d850-will-be-capable-of-4k-uhd-video-in-fx-format-with-no-crop.aspx/

THIS KILLS THE CANON

https://nikonrumors.com/2017/07/28/nikon-d850-updates-no-evf-or-hybrid-viewfinder-even-faster-than-8-fps.aspx/

THIS KILLS THE ANGRY PHOTOGRAPHER

Will this camera beat Canon in every way?

>>3123495
im pretty sure nikon beats canon in every way already dude. Ever since they started using sony sensors it's been a landslide

>>3123542
>Ever since they started using sony sensors it's been a landslide

in the end it doesn't even matter

>>3123553
Yea, because you kill yourself because your friend did, leaving your wife and kids behind

>>3123542
Well cameras are more than just their sensors...

>>3120422
real pro photographers use OVF

File: 1448763911009.jpg (40KB, 500x476px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 500x476px

>>3123582
>your face when Chester B bought his family a 2.5 million dollar home before he offed himself

NR:
>10 fps (without battery pack)

The idea is sound. It's basically copying the A99ii IQ+speed concept.

But something will usually go wrong with the shutter mechanics.

>>3124748
NR said that the D850 is based on D5 rather than D810, so the shutter could be the same. At least I haven't heard of shutter problems with D5 or any Nikon after D600 for that matter.

>>3124754
>or any Nikon after D600
D750 had 3 recalls due to the same cheapass shutter they used.

>>3124755
I've missed that.

>>3120082
Wow. Even D810 is pretty expensive already (with the gigantic 36 MP full frame). This kills the Leicucks and Fujicucks.

How comes, that gear-fags can't stand, that I have the better peen? Thanks!

>>3120626
>>>/instagram/

>>3124812
Better what ?

>>3124817
Idk, I just like to throw in terms! Also let's just put all these endless discussions up front on /p/'s first page again!

>>3124815
he's right though

>>3124755
Where are the D600 and D750 shutters made?

I know my D800 shutter was made in Japan.

>>3123495
>Will this camera beat Canon in every way?

Nah, Canon will still have more saturated colors in the default profile.

And Canon fanboys will point this out constantly, even though you can easily load any Canon profile into the D850.

>>3124800
You make no goddamn sense at all, buddy

>>3124859
And you can also edit Nikon profiles.

>>3124863
You're just low IQ that's all

>>3124918
Says a man who can't form proper sentences. How ironic.

In any case, let's brake down your comment, just because I'm bored. D810 is currently priced at around $2500 which isn't that expensive for what it is, and D850 is rumoured to be +$1000, which again is right where it should be, pro camera with high mpx count and burst speed. These are not some kids toys.

And then, what has leica and fuji customers to do with any of this? Nothing. Leica caters to mostly wealthy people, who want something well made and luxurious and don't care about price. Most of them couldn't care less about what D850 is rumoured to be. Fuji customers on the other hand typically want a well made and well designed cohesive system that isn't too large, with a nice user experience and a large serving of nostalgia on the side. Again, completely different market.

>>3125057
>let's brake down
tell me more about what it's like to be a warking profesionnal

New information from NR:
>the D850 LCD will have twice the resolution of the D810
>slo-mo full HD 120fps video
>the SD slot will support UHS-II
>improved LiveView split-screen display
>improved silent shooting mode
>improved battery life
>lighter than the D810

>>3125518
>the SD slot will support UHS-II
This is stupid. With a ~50MP sensor they should at least offer a XQD version like the D5 does.

>>3125214
It's pretty nice, I have a masters degree and work in r&d in a small company. I have a bunch of friendly and smart colleagues and a fun boss, laid back work and decent pay. 8/10, would recommend.

Now, tell us what is it like being an illiterate NEET?

>>3125057
>Says a man who can't form proper sentences. How ironic.

I truly hope this is a joke. Your whole post is filled with spelling and grammar errors along with some messed up sentences

>>3125577
It will have one XQD and SD slot.

>>3125584
you forgot to include the part about your hawt 10/10 girlfriend who looks just like naruto