What are your favorite presets for making an image look

>>3114332
pic unrelated I suppose

Shooting actual film

>>3114332

Tri-X 320 and HC110 Dil. B

>>3114332
> making an image look more like film?
NEEDS MOAR GRAIN

>>3114332
just fuck up the white balance and it'll look like a typical hipster snapshit
>>3114339
luv ya sug

>>3114398
/Thread

>>3114332
Before pic looks better desu

File: P1160156 TWO.jpg (2MB, 1619x1000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1619x1000px

>>3114395
>grain
Shooting with Lumix

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Camera Model	DMC-G70
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.16
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	70 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2016:11:18 17:11:57
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	400
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	35.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1619
Image Height	1000
Exposure Mode	Auto
Image Quality	Unknown
White Balance	Auto
Focus Mode	Unknown
Spot Mode	Unknown
Image Stabilizer	Mode 1
Macro Mode	Normal
Shooting Mode	Aperture Priority
Audio	No
Flash Bias	-0.33 EV

>>3114332
VSCO

>>3114332
Portra 400

>>3114398

<3

>>3114332

Superia Premium 400

A little too grainy though. Gonna have to try some others.

>>3114432
What the shit, it's like 1000 grit sand paper.

File: AR-151109588.jpg&updated=201511040823&MaxW=800&maxH=800&noborder.jpg (46KB, 800x534px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 800x534px

>>3114332
>using presets in stead of creating the image fully by yourself

>>3114477
It was a VERY underexposed image and then I set the luminance curve to vertically go exactly through the difference in noise of that image. t's a cheap trick but you have to absolutely nail the point the curve goes through and it only works on one luminance area per photo

Rollei's digibase kit.

>>3114683
kekkity kek

>>3114686
can you elaborate?